Cited by 66Williams Syndrome ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Affiliative behavior in Williams syndrome: social perception and real-life social behavior

Open access
Järvinen-Pasley, Anna, Adolphs, Ralph, Yam, Anna, Hill, Kiley J., Grichanik, Mark, Reilly, Judy, Mills, Debra, Reiss, Allan L. +2 more·2010·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

A frequently noted but largely anecdotal behavioral observation in Williams syndrome (WS) is an increased tendency to approach strangers, yet the basis for this behavior remains unknown. We examined the relationship between affect identification ability and affiliative behavior in participants with WS relative to a neurotypical comparison group. We quantified social behavior from self-judgments of approachability for faces, and from parent/other evaluations of real life. Relative to typical individuals, participants with WS were perceived as more sociable by others, exhibited perceptual deficits in affect identification, and judged faces of strangers as more approachable. In WS, high self-rated willingness to approach strangers was correlated with poor affect identification ability, suggesting that these two findings may be causally related. We suggest that the real-life hypersociability in WS may arise at least in part from abnormal perceptual processing of other people's faces, rather than from an overall bias at the level of behavior. While this did not achieve statistical significance, it provides preliminary evidence to suggest that impaired social-perceptual ability may play a role in increased approachability in WS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.032

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The speech of individuals with Williams syndrome is marked by high levels of socially engaging language compared to controls or individuals with other developmental disorders such as Down Syndrome.

    “In addition, the speech of individuals with WS is marked by high levels of socially engaging language as compared to controls or individuals with other developmental disorders such as Down Syndrome (Jarvinen-Pasley et al., 2010; Jarvinen et al., 2013).”

    From Oxytocin and vasopressin systems in genetic syndromes and neurodevelopmental disorders (2014) · cites this paper as Jarvinen-Pasley et al., 2010

  • The social phenotype of Williams syndrome includes hypersociability, preference for novel social over non-social stimuli, and increased eye contact.

    “The social phenotype associated with WS is striking due to the hypersociability of the affected individuals, as well as the preference for novel social over non-social stimuli (Jarvinen-Pasley et al., 2008; Jarvinen-Pasley et al., 2010) and increased eye contact (Mervis et al., 2003).”

    From Oxytocin and vasopressin systems in genetic syndromes and neurodevelopmental disorders (2014) · cites this paper as Jarvinen-Pasley et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Delehanty SG 1993 Thinking about feelings: Emotional development in the preschool years Unpublished PhD thesis University of California San Diego San Diego State University
  2. Ekman P Friesen WV 1978 Facial Action Coding System (FACS): A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Action Palo Alto, CA Consulting Psychologists' Press
  3. Wechsler D 1997 Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Third Edition (WAIS-III) San Antonio, TX Psychological Corporation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Järvinen-Pasley, A., Adolphs, R., Yam, A., Hill, K. J., Grichanik, M., Reilly, J., Mills, D., Reiss, A. L., Korenberg, J. R., & Bellugi, U.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
2110-2119
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019388783
Cited by
63
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
Williams syndrome, affiliative behavior, hypersociability, social perception, face perception, approachability, social behavior, parent ratings
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Emotions, Face, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Statistics as Topic, Williams Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review