CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 105

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conceptual control across modalities: graded specialisation for pictures and words in inferior frontal and posterior temporal cortex

Krieger-Redwood, Katya, Teige, Catarina, Davey, James, Hymers, Mark, Jefferies, Elizabeth·2015·Neuropsychologia
DOI 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.030PMC PMC4582805
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.030

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Whole brain analysis contrasts of hard over easy for all three tasks (cluster correction, Z≥2.3, p<.05). L=left, R=right hemisphere. NS=non-semantic tasks (easy=rhyme judgement; hard=problem solving task involving segmentation). VS=verbal semantic. PS=picture semantic.
Fig. 1 Whole brain analysis contrasts of hard over easy for all three tasks (cluster correction, Z≥2.3, p<.05). L=left, R=right hemisphere. NS=non-semantic tasks (easy=rhyme judgement; hard=problem solving task involving segmentation). VS=verbal semantic. PS=picture semantic.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 ROI analyses of percentage signal change in left and right IFG (8 mm spheres centred around peaks in Brodmann area 44, 45 and 47 from Whitney et al. (2011a) and implicated in semantic control). Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. L=left hemisphere; R=right hemisphere. The charts show easy and hard judgements for non-semantic tasks (non-sem), verbal semantics (verbal sem) and picture semantics (picture sem). Significant effects are summarised next to each graph (see Table 6 for details).
Fig. 2 ROI analyses of percentage signal change in left and right IFG (8 mm spheres centred around peaks in Brodmann area 44, 45 and 47 from Whitney et al. (2011a) and implicated in semantic control). Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. L=left hemisphere; R=right hemisphere. The charts show easy and hard judgements for non-semantic tasks (non-sem), verbal semantics (verbal sem) and picture semantics (picture sem). Significant effects are summarised next to each graph (see Table 6 for details).CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 ROI analyses of percentage signal change in left temporoparietal cortex; pMTG=posterior middle temporal gyrus, dAG=dorsal angular gyrus, vAG=ventral angular gyrus; 8 mm spheres centred around peaks from Noonan et al. (2013b). Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. The charts show easy and hard judgements for non-semantic tasks (non-sem), verbal semantics (verbal sem) and picture semantics (picture sem). Significant effects are summarised next to each graph (see Table 6 for details).
Fig. 3 ROI analyses of percentage signal change in left temporoparietal cortex; pMTG=posterior middle temporal gyrus, dAG=dorsal angular gyrus, vAG=ventral angular gyrus; 8 mm spheres centred around peaks from Noonan et al. (2013b). Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. The charts show easy and hard judgements for non-semantic tasks (non-sem), verbal semantics (verbal sem) and picture semantics (picture sem). Significant effects are summarised next to each graph (see Table 6 for details).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. Adams, 2002, A comparison of neural circuits underlying auditory and visual object categorization, Neuroimage, 16, 361, 10.1006/nimg.2002.1088 · DOI
  2. Anwander, 2007, Connectivity-based parcellation of Broca’s area, Cereb. Cortex, 17, 816, 10.1093/cercor/bhk034 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Aron, 2004, Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex, Trend Cogn. Sci., 8, 170, 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Beckmann, 2003, General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI, Neuroimage, 20, 1052, 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00435-X · DOI
  5. Binder, 2009, Where Is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies, Cereb. Cortex, 19, 2767, 10.1093/cercor/bhp055 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Blumstein, 2005, The perception of voice onset time: an fMRI investigation of phonetic category structure, J. Cog. Neurosci., 17, 1353, 10.1162/0898929054985473 · DOI
  7. Bookheimer, 2002, Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 25, 151, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bozeat, 2000, Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia, Neuropsychologia, 38, 1207, 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00034-8 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bright, 2004, Unitary vs multiple semantics: PET studies of word and picture processing, Brain Lang., 89, 417, 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.01.010 · DOI
  10. Brownell, 1986, Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients, Brain Lang., 27, 310, 10.1016/0093-934X(86)90022-2 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Brownell, 1990, Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients, Neuropsychologia, 28, 375, 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90063-T · DOI
  12. Chao, 1999, Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects, Nat. Neurosci., 2, 913, 10.1038/13217 · DOI
  13. Chikazoe, 2007, Activation of right inferior frontal gyrus during response inhibition across response modalities, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 19, 69, 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.69 · DOI
  14. Coltheart, 1981, The MRC psycholinguistic database, Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A – Hum. Exp. Psychol., 33, 497, 10.1080/14640748108400805 · DOI
  15. Corbett, 2009, Different impairments of semantic cognition in semantic dementia and semantic aphasia: evidence from the non-verbal domain, Brain, 132, 2593, 10.1093/brain/awp146 · DOI
  16. Corbett, 2009, Exploring multimodal semantic control impairments in semantic aphasia: Evidence from naturalistic object use, Neuropsychologia, 47, 2721, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.020 · DOI
  17. Corbett, 2011, Deregulated semantic cognition follows prefrontal and temporo-parietal damage: evidence from the impact of task constraint on nonverbal object use, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 23, 1125, 10.1162/jocn.2010.21539 · DOI
  18. Correia, 2014, Brain-based translation: fMRI decoding of spoken words in bilinguals reveals language-independent semantic representations in anterior temporal lobe, J. Neurosci., 34, 332, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1302-13.2014 · DOI
  19. Coutanche, 2014, Creating concepts from converging features in human cortex, Cereb. Cortex
  20. Crutch, 2008, The Influence of refractoriness upon comprehension of non-verbal auditory stimuli, Neurocase, 14, 494, 10.1080/13554790802498955 · DOI
  21. Demb, 1995, Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity, J. Neurosci., 15, 5870, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-09-05870.1995 · DOI
  22. Devlin, 2003, Semantic processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a combined functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation study, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 15, 71, 10.1162/089892903321107837 · DOI
  23. Duncan, 2000, Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands, Trend Neurosci., 23, 475, 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01633-7 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Fedorenko, 2012, Language-selective and domain-general regions lie side by side within Broca’s area, Curr. Biol., 22, 2059, 10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.011 · DOI
  25. Friederici, 2009, Pathways to language: fiber tracts in the human brain, Trend Cogn. Sci., 13, 175, 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.001 · DOI
  26. Gabrieli, 1998, The role of the prefrontal cortex in language and memory, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 95, 906, 10.1073/pnas.95.3.906 · DOI
  27. Garavan, 1999, Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 96, 8301, 10.1073/pnas.96.14.8301 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Gardner, 2012, The differential contributions of pFC and temporo-parietal cortex to multimodal semantic control: exploring refractory effects in semantic aphasia, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 1
  29. Gennari, 2007, Context-dependent interpretation of words: evidence for interactive neural processes, Neuroimage, 35, 1278, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.015 · DOI
  30. Gobel, 2001, The mental number line and the human angular gyrus, Neuroimage, 14, 1278, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0927 · DOI
  31. Gold, 2006, Dissociation of automatic and strategic lexical-semantics: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for differing roles of multiple frontotemporal regions, J. Neurosci., 26, 6523, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0808-06.2006 · DOI
  32. Gold, 2002, Common prefrontal regions coactivate with dissociable posterior regions during controlled semantic and phonological tasks, Neuron, 35, 803, 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00800-0 · DOI
  33. Gough, 2005, Dissociating linguistic processes in the left inferior frontal cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation, J. Neurosci., 25, 8010, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2307-05.2005 · DOI
  34. Grinband, 2008, Detection of time-varying signals in event-related fMRI designs, NeuroImage, 43, 509, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.065 · DOI
  35. Hickok, 2000, Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception, Trend Cogn. Sci., 4, 131, 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01463-7 · DOI
  36. Hickok, 2004, Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language, Cognition, 92, 67, 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Hirnstein, 2011, TMS over the left angular gyrus impairs the ability to discriminate left from right, Neuropsychologia, 49, 29, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.028 · DOI
  38. Hoffman, 2012, Posterior middle temporal gyrus is involved in verbal and non-verbal semantic cognition: evidence from rTMS, Aphasiology, 26, 1119, 10.1080/02687038.2011.608838 · DOI
  39. Humphreys, 2014, Fusion and fission of cognitive functions in the human parietal cortex, Cereb. Cortex
  40. Humphreys, 2013, Motion and actions in language: semantic representations in occipito-temporal cortex, Brain Lang., 125, 94, 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.008 · DOI
  41. Jefferies, 2013, The neural basis of semantic cognition: Converging evidence from neuropsychology, neuroimaging and TMS, Cortex, 49, 611, 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Jefferies, 2007, Refractory effects in stroke aphasia: a consequence of poor semantic control, Neuropsychologia, 45, 1065, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.009 · DOI
  43. Jefferies, 2006, Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison, Brain, 129, 2132, 10.1093/brain/awl153 · DOI
  44. Jefferies, 2008, Deficits of knowledge versus executive control in semantic cognition: Insights from cued naming, Neuropsychologia, 46, 649, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.007 · DOI
  45. Jenkinson, 2002, Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images, Neuroimage, 17, 825, 10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Jung-Beeman, 2005, Bilateral brain proceses for comprehending natural language, Trend Cogn. Sci., 2005, 512, 10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Kable, 2005, Conceptual representations of action in the lateral temporal cortex, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 17, 1855, 10.1162/089892905775008625 · DOI
  48. Kanwisher, 1997, The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception, J. Neurosci., 17, 4302, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04302.1997 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Kellenbach, 2003, Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 15, 30, 10.1162/089892903321107800 · DOI
  50. Kelley, 1998, Hemispheric specialization in human dorsal frontal cortex and medial temporal lobe for verbal and nonverbal memory encoding, Neuron, 20, 927, 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80474-2 · DOI
  51. Lambon Ralph, 2010, Coherent concepts are computed in the anterior temporal lobes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 107, 2717, 10.1073/pnas.0907307107 · DOI
  52. Lambon Ralph, 2008, Generalization and differentiation in semantic memory, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1124, 61, 10.1196/annals.1440.006 · DOI
  53. Lee, 2006, Metaphorical vs. literal word meanings: fMRI evidence against a selective role of the right hemisphere, NeuroImage, 29, 536, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.003 · DOI
  54. Lenartowicz, 2011, Inhibition-related activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus in the absence of inhibitory cues, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 23, 3388, 10.1162/jocn_a_00031 · DOI
  55. Martin, 2007, The representation of object concepts in the brain, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58, 25, 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143 · DOI
  56. Mion, 2010, What the left and right anterior fusiform gyri tell us about semantic memory, Brain, 133, 3256, 10.1093/brain/awq272 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Nagel, 2008, Functional MRI investigation of verbal selection mechanisms in lateral prefrontal cortex, Neuroimage, 43, 801, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.017 · DOI
  58. Nixon, 2004, The inferior frontal gyrus and phonological processing: An investigation using rTMS, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 16, 289, 10.1162/089892904322984571 · DOI
  59. Nobre, 2004, Orienting attention to locations in perceptual versus mental representations, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 16, 363, 10.1162/089892904322926700 · DOI
  60. Noonan, 2013, Demonstrating the qualitative differences between semantic aphasia and semantic dementia: a novel exploration of nonverbal semantic processing, Behav. Neurol., 26, 7, 10.1155/2013/941542 · DOI
  61. Noonan, 2010, Elucidating the nature of deregulated semantic cognition in semantic aphasia: evidence for the roles of prefrontal and temporo-parietal cortices, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 22, 1597, 10.1162/jocn.2009.21289 · DOI
  62. Noppeney, 2004, The neural areas that control the retrieval and selection of semantics, Neuropsychologia, 42, 1269, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.014 · DOI
  63. Ojemann, 1979, Human language cortex: localization of memory, syntax, and sequential motor-phoneme identification systems, Science, 205, 1401, 10.1126/science.472757 · DOI
  64. Peelen, 2012, Conceptual object representations in human anterior temporal cortex, J. Neurosci., 32, 15728, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1953-12.2012 · DOI
  65. Pobric, 2010, Amodal semantic representations depend on both left and right anterior temporal lobes: new rTMS evidence, Neuropsychologia, 48, 1336, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.036 · DOI
  66. Poldrack, 2001, Relations between the neural bases of dynamic auditory processing and phonological processing: Evidence from fMRI, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 13, 687, 10.1162/089892901750363235 · DOI
  67. Poldrack, 1999, Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex, NeuroImage, 10, 15, 10.1006/nimg.1999.0441 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Rodd, 2005, The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity, Cereb. Cortex, 15, 1261, 10.1093/cercor/bhi009 · DOI
  69. Rogers, 2004, The structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation, Psychol. Rev., 111, 205, 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.205 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Romero, 2006, The neural correlates of phonological short-term memory: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 18, 1147, 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1147 · DOI
  71. Saffran, 2000, The organization of semantic memory: in support of a distributed model, Brain Lang., 71, 204, 10.1006/brln.1999.2251 · DOI
  72. Saur, 2008, Ventral and dorsal pathways for language, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 105, 18035, 10.1073/pnas.0805234105 · DOI
  73. Seghier, 2010, Functional subdivisions in the left angular gyrus where the semantic system meets and diverges from the default network, J. Neurosci., 30, 16809, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3377-10.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Seghier, 2004, Variability of fMRI activation during a phonological and semantic language task in healthy subjects, Hum. Brain Mapp., 23, 140, 10.1002/hbm.20053 · DOI
  75. Sharp, 2010, The neural response to changing semantic and perceptual complexity during language processing, Hum. Brain Mapp., 31, 365, 10.1002/hbm.20871 · DOI
  76. Simanova, 2014, Modality-independent decoding of semantic information from the human brain, Cereb. Cortex, 24, 426, 10.1093/cercor/bhs324 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Snyder, 2007, Prefrontal cortical response to conflict during semantic and phonological tasks, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 19, 761, 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.761 · DOI
  78. Thompson-Schill, 1997, Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 14792, 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792 · DOI
  79. Turken, 2011, The neural architecture of the language comprehension network: converging evidence from lesion and connectivity analyses, Front. Syst. Neurosci., 5, 1, 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00001 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Vandenberghe, 1996, Functional anatomy of a common semantic system for words and pictures, Nature, 383, 254, 10.1038/383254a0 · DOI
  81. Vigneau, 2006, Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing, Neuroimage, 30, 1414, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Visser, 2012, Both the middle temporal gyrus and the ventral anterior temporal area are crucial for multimodal semantic processing: distortion-corrected fmri evidence for a double gradient of information convergence in the temporal lobes, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 24, 1766, 10.1162/jocn_a_00244 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Visser, 2009, Semantic processing in the anterior temporal lobes: a meta-analysis of the functional neuroimaging literature, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 22, 1083, 10.1162/jocn.2009.21309 · DOI
  84. Visser, 2011, Differential contributions of bilateral ventral anterior temporal lobe and left anterior superior temporal gyrus to semantic processes, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 23, 3121, 10.1162/jocn_a_00007 · DOI
  85. Wagner, 1997, Semantic repetition priming for verbal and pictorial knowledge: a functional MRI study of left inferior prefrontal cortex, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 9, 714, 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.714 · DOI
  86. Wagner, 2001, Recovering meaning: left prefrontal cortex guides controlled semantic retrieval, Neuron, 31, 329, 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00359-2 · DOI
  87. Warrington, 2004, A circumscribed refractory access disorder: a verbal semantic impairment sparing visual semantics, Cogn. Neuropsychol., 21, 299, 10.1080/02643290342000546 · DOI
  88. Whitney, 2009, The influence of multiple primes on bottom-up and top-down regulation during meaning retrieval: evidence for 2 distinct neural networks, Cereb. Cortex, 19, 2548, 10.1093/cercor/bhp007 · DOI
  89. Whitney, 2011, Heterogeneity of the left temporal lobe in semantic representation and control: priming multiple versus single meanings of ambiguous words, Cereb. Cortex, 21, 831, 10.1093/cercor/bhq148 · DOI
  90. Whitney, 2011, The neural organization of semantic control: tms evidence for a distributed network in left inferior frontal and posterior middle temporal gyrus, Cereb. Cortex, 21, 1066, 10.1093/cercor/bhq180 · DOI
  91. Whitney, 2012, Executive semantic processing is underpinned by a large-scale neural network: revealing the contribution of left prefrontal, posterior temporal, and parietal cortex to controlled retrieval and selection using TMS, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 24, 133, 10.1162/jocn_a_00123 · DOI
  92. Wilson, 1988, The MRC psycholinguistic databse: machine readable dictionary, version 2, Behav. Res. Methods, Instrum. Comput., 20, 6, 10.3758/BF03202594 · DOI
  93. Woolrich, 2004, Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference, Neuroimage, 21, 1732, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.023 · DOI
  94. Xiang, 2010, Topographical functional connectivity pattern in the perisylvian language networks, Cereb. Cortex, 20, 549, 10.1093/cercor/bhp119 · DOI
  95. Zempleni, 2007, Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI, Neuroimage, 34, 1270, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.048 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Metadata

Authors
Krieger-Redwood, K., Teige, C., Davey, J., Hymers, M., & Jefferies, E.
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
76
Pages
92-107
ISSN
0028-3932
DOI
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.030
PMC
PMC4582805
Cited by
105
References
16
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • BBSRC
  • ERC (283530-SEMBIND)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review