Cited by 691Multisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and Adaptation

Coding of peripersonal space in inferior premotor cortex (area F4).

Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Luppino, G., Matelli, M., Rizzolatti, G.·1996·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

1. We studied the functional properties of neurons in the caudal part of inferior area 6 (area F4) in awake monkeys. In agreement with previous reports, we found that the large majority (87%) of neurons responded to sensory stimuli. The responsive neurons fell into three categories: somatosensory neurons (30%); visual neurons (14%); and bimodal, visual and somatosensory neurons (56%). Both somatosensory and bimodal neurons typically responded to light touch of the skin. Their RFs were located on the face, neck, trunk, and arms. Approaching objects were the most effective visual stimuli. Visual RFs were mostly located in the space near the monkey (peripersonal space). Typically they extended in the space adjacent to the tactile RFs. 2. The coordinate system in which visual RFs were coded was studied in 110 neurons. In 94 neurons the RF location was independent of eye position, remaining in the same position in the peripersonal space regardless of eye deviation. The RF location with respect to the monkey was not modified by changing monkey position in the recording room. In 10 neurons the RF's location followed the eye movements, remaining in the same retinal position (retinocentric RFs). For the remaining six neurons the RF organization was not clear. We will refer to F4 neurons with RF independent of eye position as somatocentered neurons. 3. In most somatocentered neurons (43 of 60 neurons) the background level of activity and the response to visual stimuli were not modified by changes in eye position, whereas they were modulated in the remaining 17. It is important to note that eye deviations were constantly accompanied by a synergic increase of the activity of the ipsilateral neck muscles. It is not clear, therefore, whether the modulation of neuron discharge depended on eye position or was a consequence of changes in neck muscle activity. 4. The effect of stimulus velocity (20-80 cm/s) on neuron response intensity and RF extent in depth was studied in 34 somatocentered neurons. The results showed that in most neurons the increase of stimulus velocity produced an expansion in depth of the RF. 5. We conclude that space is coded differently in areas that control somatic and eye movements. We suggest that space coding in different cortical areas depends on the computational necessity of the effectors they control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.1996.76.1.141

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is possible that bimodal and multimodal cells in premotor and posterior parietal areas could play important roles by mediating critical multisensory integration.

    “It is possible that bimodal and multimodal cells in premotor and posterior parietal areas could play important roles by mediating critical multisensory integration [7], [41], [42], [43], [47].”

    From If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping (2008) · cites this paper as [41]

  • These areas contain many neurons that integrate visual, tactile and proprioceptive information in head and body-part centred reference frames.

    “they contain many neurons that integrate visual, tactile and proprioceptive information in head and body-part centred reference frames [7], [41], [42], [43], [47].”

    From If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping (2008) · cites this paper as [41]

  • These areas are part of a system that controls actions.

    “These areas are part of a system that controls actions”

    From If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping (2008) · cites this paper as [41]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Luppino, G., Matelli, M., & Rizzolatti, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Universita di Parma, Italy.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
1996-07-01
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
141-157
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1785556983
Cited by
688
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 24
FWCI
29.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
peripersonal space, eye position, visual receptive fields, bimodal neurons, stimulus velocity, neck muscle activity, spatial coding, monkeys
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Cues, Depth Perception, Environment, Fixation, Ocular, Macaca nemestrina, Motion Perception, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Retina, Robotics, Somatosensory Cortex, Visual Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review