The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 171 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Individuals frequently discount recommendations that contradict their prior judgment, even when those recommendations are objectively accurate (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Even when external advice is objectively accurate, decision makers frequently maintain their original judgment, especially when that advice contradicts their prior beliefs or professional intuition.”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“This finding differs from the expectation that experienced judges may be more resistant to advice because they can generate more internal arguments supporting their initial view (Yaniv 2004;Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Expertise may further amplify this discounting behavior.Individuals who perceive themselves as highly competent generally show stronger resistance to external advice (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Research indicates that convergent advice from multiple sources increases perceived validity and strengthens confidence in external recommendations (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006;Soll et al. 2022).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Disagreement among advisors reduces trust and decreases the weight assigned to external inputs (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006;Wanzel et al. 2017;Yaniv et al. 2009).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Unfortunately, humans tend to err in these estimates, often overestimating their chance of being correct, leading to an implicit, unwarranted preference for their own opinions, an ego bias [52][53][54][55][56][57] .”
From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
In the citing paper
“Trust was measured as CADx prediction utilization, defined as an endoscopist's willingness to follow the CADx prediction when the endoscopist initially disagreed with the CADx prediction 9,10”
From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Unsolicited advice can be received poorly and considered intrusive, whereas explicitly solicited advice can be considered cooperative and helpful.10”
From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,243
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · Cited by 6,903
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,840
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1986) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.12381759.38 · Cited by 4,544
Connolly, T., & Axelrod, R. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392957 · Cited by 3,947
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 171 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Cooper, R. S. (1991). Information processing in the judge–adviser system of group decision-making. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Dalal, R. S. (2001). The effect of expert advice and financial incentives on cooperation. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Gibbons, A. M. (2003). Alternative forms of advice in natural decision settings. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Griffeth, 1995, The employee turnover process, Vol. 13, 245
- Jungermann, H. (1999). Advice-giving and taking. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32). Maui, HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE). [CD-ROM]. www.gp.tu-berlin.de/Users/j/jungermann/Publications/Advice%20giving.html.
- Lualhati, J.C. (1992). Performance forecast accuracy and confidence in a judge–adviser decision system. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (11th ed.) (2003). [Electronic version]. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
- Mount, 1995, The Big Five Personality Dimensions: implications for research and practice in human resources management, Vol. 13, 153
- Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (Eds.) (2001). Shared cognition [Special Issue]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,003
Using generative AI as decision-support tools: unraveling users’ trust and AI appreciation
Huynh, M.-T. (2024) · Journal of Decision System · doi:10.1080/12460125.2024.2428166 · Cited by 53
Alexiev, A. S., Volberda, H., Jansen, J. J. P., & van den Bosch, F. (2019) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840619830128 · Cited by 48
Sah, S., Loewenstein, G. F., & Cain, D. M. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218805991 · Cited by 40
Balakrishnan, M., Ferreira, K., & Tong, J. D. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03850 · Cited by 45
Who's Driving this Conversation? Systematic Biases in the Content of Online Consumer Discussions
Hamilton, R. W., Schlosser, A. E., & Chen, Y. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0012 · Cited by 39
Multi-objectivization and ensembles of shapings in reinforcement learning
Brys, T., Harutyunyan, A., Vrancx, P., Nowé, A., & Taylor, M. E. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.02.096 · Cited by 40
The computational basis of following advice in adolescents
Buritica, J. M. R., Heekeren, H. R., & van den Bos, W. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.019 · Cited by 38
Decision-Making Under Uncertainty in Research Synthesis
Kale, A. M., Kay, M., & Hullman, J. R. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300432 · Cited by 51
Strategies for integrating disparate social information
Molleman, L., Tump, A. N., Gradassi, A., Herzog, S. M., Jayles, B., Kurvers, R. H. J. M., & van den Bos, W. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.2413 · Cited by 35
Alexiev, A. S., Jansen, J. J. P., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D., & Volberda, H. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1083987 · Cited by 39
Preference for human or algorithmic forecasting advice does not predict if and how it is used
Himmelstein, M., & Budescu, D. V. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2285 · Cited by 48
Justice, trust, and moral judgements when personnel selection is supported by algorithms
Feldkamp, T., Langer, M., Wies, L., & König, C. J. (2023) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2023.2169140 · Cited by 48
Sturm, T., Pumplun, L., Gerlach, J. P., Kowalczyk, M., & Buxmann, P. (2023) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2023.101790 · Cited by 48
Cardiovascular reactivity and resistance to opposing viewpoints during intragroup conflict
de Wit, F., Scheepers, D. T., & Jehn, K. A. (2012) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01456.x · Cited by 41
Minson, J. A., Mueller, J., & Larrick, R. P. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2823 · Cited by 39
Consumers on the Job: Contextualization Crafting in Expert Services
Azzari, C. N., Anderson, L., Mende, M., Jefferies, J. G., Downey, H., Ostrom, A. L., & Spanjol, J. (2021) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705211012474 · Cited by 40
Ng, T. B., & Shankar, P. G. (2010) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1743 · Cited by 38
Hit or Miss: What Leads Experts to Take Advice for Long-Term Judgments?
Ecken, P., & Pibernik, R. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2219 · Cited by 37
Super-docility in organizations: an evolutionary model
Secchi, D., & Bardone, E. (2009) · International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior · doi:10.1108/ijotb-12-03-2009-b001 · Cited by 37
Strategic Information Disclosure to People with Multiple Alternatives
Azaria, A., Rabinovich, Z., Kraus, S., & Goldman, C. V. (2011) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v25i1.7878 · Cited by 36
Implementing a Delight Strategy in a Restaurant Setting
Barnes, D. C., Meyer, T., & Kinard, B. R. (2016) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1938965515626296 · Cited by 41
Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2015) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650215605154 · Cited by 42
Advise with Permission?: The Effects of Advice Solicitation on Advice Outcomes
Swol, L. M. V., MacGeorge, E. L., & Prahl, A. (2017) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2017.1363795 · Cited by 36
Digital messaging to improve college enrollment and success
Avery, C. N., Castleman, B., Hurwitz, M. D., Long, B. T., & Page, L. C. (2021) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102170 · Cited by 43
From whom do we learn group norms? Low-ranking group members are perceived as the best sources
Dannals, J. E., Reit, E. S., & Miller, D. T. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.08.002 · Cited by 36
Ceremonious politeness in consuming food in VFR tourism: scale development
Taheri, B., Jafari, A., & Okumuş, B. (2017) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2017.1369969 · Cited by 35
The importance of online reviews depends on when they are presented
Camilleri, A. R. (2020) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2020.113307 · Cited by 37
Follow My Lead: Assertive Cheap Talk and the Gender Gap
Manian, S., & Sheth, K. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3837 · Cited by 35
The errors of experts: When expertise hinders effective provision and seeking of advice and feedback
Zhang, T., Harrington, K. B., & Sherf, E. N. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.011 · Cited by 35
Can simple advice eliminate the gender gap in willingness to compete?
Kessel, D., Möllerström, J., & van Veldhuizen, R. (2021) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103777 · Cited by 35
AI literacy and trust: A multi-method study of Human-GAI team collaboration
Pan, Z., Moore, O. A., Papadimitriou, A., & Zhu, J. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100162 · Cited by 48
The benefits of argumentation are cross-culturally robust: The case of Japan
Mercier, H., Deguchi, M., der Henst, J. V., & Yama, H. (2015) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2014.1002534 · Cited by 35
Hoeken, H., Šorm, E., & Schellens, P. J. (2013) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.807303 · Cited by 34
Algorithm aversion? On the influence of advice accuracy on trust in algorithmic advice
Daschner, S., & Obermaier, R. (2022) · Journal of Decision System · doi:10.1080/12460125.2022.2070951 · Cited by 42
Forming post-COVID supply chains: does supply chain managers' social network affect resilience?
Nikookar, E., & Yanadori, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2021-0167 · Cited by 41
Effects of Anger, Disgust, and Sadness on Sharing with Others
Polman, E., & Kim, S. H. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213500998 · Cited by 40
When Self-Humanization Leads to Algorithm Aversion
Heßler, P. O., Pfeiffer, J., & Hafenbrädl, S. (2022) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-022-00754-y · Cited by 40
Effects of the Advisor and Environment on Requesting and Complying With Automated Advice
Sutherland, S. C., Harteveld, C., & Young, M. E. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/2905370 · Cited by 35
On the Inability to Ignore Useless Advice
Schultze, T., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2017) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000361 · Cited by 32
Masked smiles matter – employee verbal expertise and emotion display during COVID-19
Hofmann, V., Stokburger-Sauer, N. E., Wanisch, A. T., & Hebborn, H. (2021) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2021.1873296 · Cited by 34
Judgmental Adjustments of Previously Adjusted Forecasts*
Önkal, D., Gonul, M. S., & Lawrence, M. J. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00190.x · Cited by 32
Why Does Advice Discounting Occur? The Combined Roles of Confidence and Trust
Wang, X., & Du, X. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02381 · Cited by 31
Schilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Schultze, T., Mojzisch, A., & Vogeley, K. T. (2013) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2013.775967 · Cited by 31
A failure to communicate: an experimental investigation of the effects of advice on strategic play
Cooper, D. J., & Kagel, J. H. (2015) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.10.008 · Cited by 31
Meißner, P., Brands, C., & Wulf, T. (2016) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.08.002 · Cited by 31
“Us vs. them” or “us over them”? On the roles of similarity and status in M&As
Yildiz, H. E. (2015) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.05.002 · Cited by 36
I am Robot, Your Health Adviser for Older Adults: Do You Trust My Advice?
Giorgi, I., Minutolo, A., Tirotto, F. A., Hagen, O., Esposito, M., Gianni, M., Palomino, M. A., & Masala, G. L. (2023) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-023-01019-8 · Cited by 32
The Neuropeptide Oxytocin Enhances Information Sharing and Group Decision Making Quality
de Wilde, T. R. W., Velden, F. S. T., & Dreu, C. K. W. D. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep40622 · Cited by 32
Griffith, E. E., Kadous, K., & Proell, C. A. (2020) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2020.101153 · Cited by 30
Algorithms as partners in crime: A lesson in ethics by design
Krügel, S., Ostermaier, A., & Uhl, M. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107483 · Cited by 30
Cawley, A., Heanue, K., Hilliard, R., O’Donoghue, C., & Sheehan, M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15043226 · Cited by 37
Putting a human in the loop: Increasing uptake, but decreasing accuracy of automated decision-making
Sele, D., & Chugunova, M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298037 · Cited by 30
Trefalt, Š., Drnovšek, M., Nabergoj, A. S., & Adlešič, R. V. (2013) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2013.04.006 · Cited by 32
Influences of Distrust (and Trust) on Decision Making
Schul, Y., & Peri, N. (2015) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2015.33.5.414 · Cited by 32
Evaluating expert advice in forecasting: Users’ reactions to presumed vs. experienced credibility
Önkal, D., Gonul, M. S., Goodwin, P., Thomson, M. E., & Öz, E. (2016) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.12.009 · Cited by 32
Advice Utilization From Predictive Analytics Tools: The Trend is Your Friend
Fehrenbacher, D. D., Ghio, A., & Weisner, M. (2022) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2022.2138934 · Cited by 38
The Alumni Effect and Professional Skepticism: An Experimental Investigation
Favere‐Marchesi, M., & Emby, C. (2017) · Accounting Horizons · doi:10.2308/acch-51920 · Cited by 29
“Interfaces for explanations in human-AI interaction: proposing a design evaluation approach,”
Mucha, H., Robert, S., Breitschwerdt, R., & Fellmann, M. (2021) · Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411763.3451759 · Cited by 30
Tai, K., Keem, S., Lee, K., & Kim, E. S. (2022) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221121597 · Cited by 29
Task-specific algorithm advice acceptance: A review and directions for future research
Kaufmann, E., Chacon, A., Kausel, E. E., Herrera, N., & Reyes, T. H. (2023) · Data and Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.dim.2023.100040 · Cited by 35
Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy
Introzzi, L., Zonca, J., Cabitza, F., Cherubini, P., & Reverberi, C. (2024) · Digestive and Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.dld.2023.10.018 · Cited by 28
Advice from artificial intelligence: a review and practical implications
Baines, J. I., Dalal, R. S., Ponce, L. P., & Tsai, H.-C. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1390182 · Cited by 28
Self-citationKang, S., & Kim, J. W. (2021) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2019.0899 · Cited by 30
Meißner, P., & Wulf, T. (2014) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-014-0144-6 · Cited by 29
Biased Evidence Processing by Multidisciplinary Greenhouse Gas Assurance Teams
Kim, S., Green, W. J., & Johnstone, K. M. (2015) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-51368 · Cited by 31
Dunning, D. A. (2015) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0882-614520150000032006 · Cited by 27
van der Zander, Q. E. W., Roumans, R., Kusters, C. H. J., Dehghani, N., Masclee, A. A. M., de With, P. H. N., van der Sommen, F., Snijders, C. C. P., & Schoon, E. J. (2024) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.029 · Cited by 27
Competitors as advisors: Peer assistance among small business entrepreneurs
Galloway, T. L., Kuhn, K. M., & Collins-Williams, M. (2019) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2019.101929 · Cited by 27
Ache, F., Rader, C. A., & Hütter, M. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103979 · Cited by 29
The effects of recursive communication dynamics on belief updating
Pescetelli, N., & Yeung, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.0025 · Cited by 33
Toth, W., Vacik, H., Pülzl, H., & Carlsen, H. (2021) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-021-01009-7 · Cited by 27
A longitudinal approach for understanding algorithm use
Chacon, A., Kausel, E. E., & Reyes, T. H. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2275 · Cited by 32
Effects of psychological distance and social influence on tourists’ hotel booking preferences
Ma, J., & Li, F. S. (2022) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2022.2116628 · Cited by 27
The Decoy Effect and Recommendation Systems
Mousavi, N., Adamopoulos, P., & Bockstedt, J. C. (2023) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2022.1197 · Cited by 31
Belief Revision and Delusions: How Do Patients with Schizophrenia Take Advice?
Kaliuzhna, M., Chambon, V., Nicolas Franck, B., Testud, B., & der Henst, J. V. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034771 · Cited by 27
Young children heed advice selectively
Hannes Rakoczy, B., Ehrling, C., Harris, P. L., & Schultze, T. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.04.007 · Cited by 29
Ma, H. (., Huang, W. W., & Dennis, A. R. (2024) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2024.2376381 · Cited by 28
The effects of generative AI’s human-like competencies on clinical decision-making
Spatscheck, N., Schaschek, M., & Winkelmann, A. (2024) · Journal of Decision System · doi:10.1080/12460125.2024.2430731 · Cited by 28
Estep, C. (2017) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/tar-2017-0303 · Cited by 22
An agency theory scale for financial services
Tan, J. C. K., & Lee, R. (2015) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-02-2014-0039 · Cited by 28
The Effect of Intuitive Advice Justification on Advice Taking
Tzioti, S. C., Wierenga, B., & van Osselaer, S. M. J. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1790 · Cited by 28
Utilizing simple cues to informational dependency
Mercier, H., & Miton, H. (2019) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.01.001 · Cited by 26
Other-serving bias in advice-taking: When advisors receive more credit than blame
Palmeira, M. M., Spassova, G., & Keh, H. T. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.06.001 · Cited by 28
Is the Use of Averaging in Advice Taking Modulated by Culture?
Mercier, H., Kawasaki, Y., Yama, H., Adachi, K., & der Henst, J. V. (2012) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/156853712x633893 · Cited by 25
How do emerging adults respond to exercise advice from parents? A test of advice response theory
Guntzviller, L. M., Ratcliff, C. L., Dorsch, T. E., & Osai, K. V. (2016) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407516662920 · Cited by 25
Guntzviller, L. M., MacGeorge, E. L., & Brinker, D. L. (2017) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1352099 · Cited by 28
Knowing-it-all but still learning: Perceptions of one’s own knowledge and belief revision.
Hagá, S., & Olson, K. R. (2017) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/dev0000433 · Cited by 29
Promoting Energy-Efficient Behavior by Depicting Social Norms in a Recommender Interface
Starke, A. D., Willemsen, M. C., & Snijders, C. C. P. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3460005 · Cited by 27
Differences in Simulated Doctor and Patient Medical Decision Making: A Construal Level Perspective
Peng, J., He, F., Zhang, Y., Liu, Q., Miao, D., & Xiao, W. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079181 · Cited by 25
Self-Other Decision Making Difference: A Construal Level Perspective
Xu, J.-Z., & Xie, X. (2012) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2011.00011 · Cited by 25
Communicating the validity of structured job interviews with graphical visual aids
Zhang, D. C., Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12220 · Cited by 28
The newsvendor problem: The role of prospect theory and feedback
Surti, C., Celani, A., & Gajpal, Y. (2020) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.013 · Cited by 28
Yang, L., Bauer, K., Li, X., & Hinz, O. F. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03918 · Cited by 39
Evidence for arrogance: On the relative importance of expertise, outcome, and manner
Milyavsky, M., Kruglanski, A. W., Chernikova, M., & Schori‐Eyal, N. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180420 · Cited by 26
With a little help from my peers
Starke, A. D., Willemsen, M. C., & Snijders, C. C. P. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3377325.3377518 · Cited by 27
Triki, A., & Weisner, M. (2014) · Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting · doi:10.2308/jeta-51078 · Cited by 24
Strategic Information Disclosure to People with Multiple Alternatives
Azaria, A., Rabinovich, Z., Goldman, C. V., & Kraus, S. (2014) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/2558397 · Cited by 24
Simply the best: An exploration of advice that small business owners value
Kuhn, K. M., Galloway, T. L., & Collins-Williams, M. (2017) · Journal of Business Venturing Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.05.003 · Cited by 24
Group Effects on Individual Attitudes Toward Social Responsibility
Secchi, D., & Bui, H. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3106-x · Cited by 30
Stressed decision makers and use of decision aids: a literature review and conceptual model
Adya, M., & Phillips-Wren, G. E. (2019) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-04-2019-0194 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bonaccio, Silvia
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-151
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148237550
- Cited by
- 1,011
- References
- 171
- Citations by year
- 2026: 91 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- advice taking, advice-giving, decision-making, decision accuracy, confidence, organizational behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
