The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 171 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Individuals frequently discount recommendations that contradict their prior judgment, even when those recommendations are objectively accurate (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Even when external advice is objectively accurate, decision makers frequently maintain their original judgment, especially when that advice contradicts their prior beliefs or professional intuition.”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“This finding differs from the expectation that experienced judges may be more resistant to advice because they can generate more internal arguments supporting their initial view (Yaniv 2004;Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Expertise may further amplify this discounting behavior.Individuals who perceive themselves as highly competent generally show stronger resistance to external advice (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Research indicates that convergent advice from multiple sources increases perceived validity and strengthens confidence in external recommendations (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006;Soll et al. 2022).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Disagreement among advisors reduces trust and decreases the weight assigned to external inputs (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006;Wanzel et al. 2017;Yaniv et al. 2009).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Unfortunately, humans tend to err in these estimates, often overestimating their chance of being correct, leading to an implicit, unwarranted preference for their own opinions, an ego bias [52][53][54][55][56][57] .”
From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
In the citing paper
“Trust was measured as CADx prediction utilization, defined as an endoscopist's willingness to follow the CADx prediction when the endoscopist initially disagreed with the CADx prediction 9,10”
From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Unsolicited advice can be received poorly and considered intrusive, whereas explicitly solicited advice can be considered cooperative and helpful.10”
From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,243
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · Cited by 6,903
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,840
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1986) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.12381759.38 · Cited by 4,544
Connolly, T., & Axelrod, R. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392957 · Cited by 3,947
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 171 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Cooper, R. S. (1991). Information processing in the judge–adviser system of group decision-making. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Dalal, R. S. (2001). The effect of expert advice and financial incentives on cooperation. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Gibbons, A. M. (2003). Alternative forms of advice in natural decision settings. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Griffeth, 1995, The employee turnover process, Vol. 13, 245
- Jungermann, H. (1999). Advice-giving and taking. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32). Maui, HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE). [CD-ROM]. www.gp.tu-berlin.de/Users/j/jungermann/Publications/Advice%20giving.html.
- Lualhati, J.C. (1992). Performance forecast accuracy and confidence in a judge–adviser decision system. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (11th ed.) (2003). [Electronic version]. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
- Mount, 1995, The Big Five Personality Dimensions: implications for research and practice in human resources management, Vol. 13, 153
- Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (Eds.) (2001). Shared cognition [Special Issue]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,003
The Persuasive Power of Algorithmic and Crowdsourced Advice
Gunaratne, J., Zalmanson, L., & Nov, O. (2018) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1523534 · Cited by 85
A meta-analysis of the weight of advice in decision-making
Bailey, P. E., Leon, T., Ebner, N. C., Moustafa, A. A., & Weidemann, G. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03573-2 · Cited by 82
A survey of human judgement and quantitative forecasting methods
Zellner, M., Abbas, A. E., Budescu, D. V., & Galstyan, A. (2021) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.201187 · Cited by 100
The network science of collective intelligence
Centola, D. M. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.08.009 · Cited by 92
Asking for Help: Survey and Experimental Evidence on Financial Advice and Behavior ChangePreprint
Hung, A., & Yoong, J. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1532993 · Cited by 79
A framework for explaining reliance on decision aids
van Dongen, K., & van Maanen, P.-P. (2012) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.10.018 · Cited by 82
Li, J., Barnes, C. M., Yam, K. C., Guarana, C. L. O., & Wang, L. (2019) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2370 · Cited by 76
Effects of distance between initial estimates and advice on advice utilization
Schultze, T., Rakotoarisoa, A.-F., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2015) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500003922 · Cited by 76
Kowalczyk, M., & Buxmann, P. (2015) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2015.08.010 · Cited by 86
Advice as a form of social influence: Informational motives and the consequences for accuracy
Rader, C. A., Larrick, R. P., & Soll, J. B. (2017) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12329 · Cited by 87
The role of decision confidence in advice-taking and trust formation.
Pescetelli, N., & Yeung, N. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000960 · Cited by 79
Exploring Explanation Effects on Consumers’ Trust in Online Recommender Agents
Zhang, J., & Curley, S. P. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1357904 · Cited by 77
Do Robo-Advisors Make Us Better Investors?
Back, C., Morana, S., & Spann, M. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2023.101984 · Cited by 101
Corrupted by Algorithms? How AI-generated and Human-written Advice Shape (Dis)honesty
Leib, M., Köbis, N., Rilke, R. M., Hagens, M., & Irlenbusch, B. (2023) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/uead056 · Cited by 80
Do ‘big losses’ in judgmental adjustments to statistical forecasts affect experts’ behaviour?
Petropoulos, F., Fildes, R., & Goodwin, P. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.06.002 · Cited by 71
Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E., & Vaughn, A. (2011) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022111402343 · Cited by 78
de Wit, F., Scheepers, D. T., Ellemers, N., Sassenberg, K., & Scholl, A. (2017) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2171 · Cited by 76
Goodman, J. K., Broniarczyk, S. M., Griffin, J. G., & McAlister, L. M. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2012.06.003 · Cited by 72
Unpacking the Black Box of Family Business Advising: Insights From Psychology
Strike, V. M., Michel, A., & Kammerlander, N. H. (2017) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486517735169 · Cited by 80
O’Reilly, C. A., & Hall, N. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110280 · Cited by 83
Contextualizing leaders' interpretations of proactive followership
Benson, A. J., Hardy, J., & Eys, M. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2077 · Cited by 70
CEO Advice Seeking: An Integrative Framework and Future Research Agenda
Ma, S., Kor, Y. Y., & Seidl, D. N. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206319885430 · Cited by 72
Kulms, P., & Kopp, S. (2019) · Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019 · doi:10.1145/3340764.3340793 · Cited by 68
Yaniv, I., & Choshen‐Hillel, S. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.016 · Cited by 68
Evaluating advisors: A policy‐capturing study under conditions of complete and missing information
Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2009) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.649 · Cited by 76
Self-citationCarmeli, A., Zivan, I., Gomes, E., & Markman, G. D. (2017) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.002 · Cited by 71
Dynamic expressions of confidence within an evidence accumulation framework
Desender, K., Donner, T. H., & Verguts, T. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104522 · Cited by 70
The impact of lay beliefs about AI on adoption of algorithmic advice
von Walter, B., Kremmel, D., & Jäger, B. (2021) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-021-09589-1 · Cited by 70
Coaches and Clients in Action: A Sequential Analysis of Interpersonal Coach and Client Behavior
Ianiro-Dahm, P. M., Lehmann‐Willenbrock, N., & Kauffeld, S. (2014) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9374-5 · Cited by 78
Cultural differences in decision making in project teams
Müller, R., Spang, K., & Ozcan, S. (2009) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/17538370910930527 · Cited by 73
Strategic advice provision in repeated human-agent interactions
Azaria, A., Gal, K., Kraus, S., & Goldman, C. V. (2015) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-015-9284-6 · Cited by 68
Advice: Expanding the Communication Paradigm
MacGeorge, E. L., Feng, B., & Guntzviller, L. M. (2016) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2015.11735261 · Cited by 66
Policy experts' propensity to change their opinion along Delphi rounds
Makkonen, M., Hujala, T., & Uusivuori, J. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.020 · Cited by 71
The Effect of Customer Empowerment on Adherence to Expert Advice
Camacho, N., de Jong, M., & Stremersch, S. (2014) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.03.004 · Cited by 76
Bolger, F., Stranieri, A., Wright, G., & Yearwood, J. L. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.06.002 · Cited by 65
Looney, C. A., & Hardin, A. M. (2009) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1052 · Cited by 60
Advice Giving: A Subtle Pathway to Power
Schaerer, M., Tost, L. P., Huang, L., Gino, F., & Larrick, R. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167217746341 · Cited by 66
Seeker beware: The interpersonal costs of ignoring advice
Blunden, H., Logg, J. M., Brooks, A. W., John, L. K., & Gino, F. (2018) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.002 · Cited by 63
The Impact of Advice on Women's and Men's Selection into Competition
Brandts, J., Groenert, V., & Rott, C. (2014) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1877 · Cited by 62
Maintaining Beliefs in the Face of Negative News: The Moderating Role of Experience
Staats, B. R., Diwas Singh, K. C., & Francesca Gino, B. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2640 · Cited by 65
Furlan, A., Galeazzo, A., & Paggiaro, A. (2019) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2018.1274 · Cited by 64
Reliance, trust and heuristics in judgmental forecasting
Alvarado, J., & Barrero, L. H. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.047 · Cited by 66
COP21 climate negotiators’ responses to climate model forecasts
Bosetti, V., Weber, E. U., Berger, L., Budescu, D. V., Liu, N., & Tavoni, M. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3208 · Cited by 62
Advice Taking from Humans and Machines: An fMRI and Effective Connectivity Study
Goodyear, K., Parasuraman, R., Chernyak, S. V., Madhavan, P., Deshpande, G., & Krüeger, F. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00542 · Cited by 60
Emotions in Advice Taking: The Roles of Agency and Valence
de Hooge, I. E., Verlegh, P. W. J., & Tzioti, S. C. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1801 · Cited by 64
Directive Support, Nondirective Support, and Morale
Harber, K. D., Schneider, J. K., Everard, K. M., & Fisher, E. B. (2005) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2005.24.5.691 · Cited by 60
When leaders ask questions: Can humility premiums buffer the effects of competence penalties?
Cojuharenco, I., & Karelaia, N. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.12.001 · Cited by 60
Benda, W. G. G., & Engels, T. (2010) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.03.003 · Cited by 60
Reach and speed of judgment propagation in the laboratory
Moussaïd, M., Herzog, S. M., Kämmer, J. E., & Hertwig, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1611998114 · Cited by 54
Majority rules: how good are we at aggregating convergent opinions?
Mercier, H., & Morin, O. (2019) · Evolutionary Human Sciences · doi:10.1017/ehs.2019.6 · Cited by 42
A concrete example of construct construction in natural language
Yeomans, M. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.008 · Cited by 61
The impact of technology on sports – A prospective study
Frevel, N., Beiderbeck, D., & Schmidt, S. L. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121838 · Cited by 57
Seeking advice: A sampling approach to advice taking
Hütter, M., & Ache, F. (2016) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s193029750000382x · Cited by 57
Confidence, advice seeking and changes of mind in decision making
Pescetelli, N., Hauperich, A.-K., & Yeung, N. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104810 · Cited by 55
Expertise, credibility of system forecasts and integration methods in judgmental demand forecasting
Alvarado, J., Barrero, L. H., Önkal, D., & Dennerlein, J. T. (2016) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2015.12.010 · Cited by 56
Lin, F. F., Chaboyer, W. P., Wallis, M. C., & Miller, A. (2012) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.11.024 · Cited by 59
“Why I quit journalism:” Former journalists’ advice giving as a way to regain control
Mathews, N., Bélair‐Gagnon, V., & Carlson, M. (2021) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/14648849211061958 · Cited by 54
BOHM, R. M., Jörling, M., Reiter, L., & Fuchs, C. (2023) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-023-00032-x · Cited by 67
Swol, L. M. V. (2010) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.03.002 · Cited by 61
The Effects of Presenting Imprecise Probabilities in Intelligence Forecasts
Dieckmann, N. F., Mauro, R., & Slovic, P. (2010) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01384.x · Cited by 59
Using judgment to select and adjust forecasts from statistical models
De Baets, S., & Harvey, N. (2020) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.028 · Cited by 44
What If Industrial–Organizational Psychology Decided to Take Workplace Decisions Seriously?
Dalal, R. S., Bonaccio, S., Highhouse, S., Ilgen, D. R., Mohammed, S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2010) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01258.x · Cited by 58
Self-citationExpressions of doubt and trust in online user reviews
Evans, A. M., Stavrova, O., & Rosenbusch, H. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106556 · Cited by 53
Soellner, M., & Koenigstorfer, J. (2021) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01596-6 · Cited by 56
Thinking about God increases acceptance of artificial intelligence in decision-making
Karataş, M., & Cutright, K. M. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2218961120 · Cited by 55
Large language models show amplified cognitive biases in moral decision-making
Cheung, V., Maier, M., & Lieder, F. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2412015122 · Cited by 86
Experiments on forecasting behavior with several sources of information – A review of the literature
Leitner, J. J., & Leopold‐Wildburger, U. (2011) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.006 · Cited by 53
Oxytocin Facilitates Social Learning by Promoting Conformity to Trusted Individuals
Xu, L., Becker, B., & Kendrick, K. M. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00056 · Cited by 55
Do physicians’ recommendations pull patients away from their preferred treatment options?
Mendel, R., Traut‐Mattausch, E., Frey, D., Bühner, M., Berthele, A., Kissling, W., & Hamann, J. (2011) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00658.x · Cited by 57
The Cognitive Side of Social Responsibility
Secchi, D. (2009) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0124-y · Cited by 54
Wahn, B., Schmitz, L., Gerster, F. N., & Weiss, M. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286102 · Cited by 49
Scenarios as channels of forecast advice
Önkal, D., Sayım, K. Z., & Gonul, M. S. (2012) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.015 · Cited by 55
If You Want My Advice: Status Motives and Audit Consultations About Accounting Estimates
Knechel, W. R., & Leiby, J. (2016) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12150 · Cited by 49
Sentiment change and negative herding: Evidence from microblogging and news
Kim, J., Dong, H., Choi, J., & Chang, S. R. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.055 · Cited by 50
How transparency affects algorithmic advice utilization: The mediating roles of trusting beliefs
Ning, X., Lu, Y., Li, W., & Gupta, S. (2024) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2024.114273 · Cited by 60
Naïve realism and capturing the “wisdom of dyads”
Liberman, V., Minson, J. A., Bryan, C. J., & Ross, L. D. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.016 · Cited by 50
Impact of Algorithmic Decision Making on Human Behavior: Evidence from Ultimatum Bargaining
Erlei, A., Nekdem, F., Meub, L., Anand, A., & Gadiraju, U. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v8i1.7462 · Cited by 52
Landis, B. D., Fisher, C. M., & Menges, J. I. (2021) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000876 · Cited by 54
Psychological Traits and Appropriate Reliance: Factors Shaping Trust in AI
Küper, A., & Krämer, N. (2024) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2348216 · Cited by 49
Effron, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.07.004 · Cited by 51
Technology foresight for sustainable production in the German automotive supplier industry
Förster, B. (2014) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.010 · Cited by 49
Modelling Influence and Opinion Evolution in Online Collective Behaviour
Kerckhove, C. V., Martin, S., Gend, P., Rentfrow, P. J., Hendrickx, J. M., & Blondel, V. D. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157685 · Cited by 48
fMRI neuromarketing and consumer learning theory
Hsu, M. Y.-T., & Cheng, J. M.-S. (2018) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-12-2016-0866 · Cited by 50
From Intention to Trust to Behavioral Trust: Trust Building in Family Business Advising
de Groote, J. K., & Bertschi-Michel, A. (2020) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486520938891 · Cited by 49
Ianiro-Dahm, P. M., & Kauffeld, S. (2014) · Consulting psychology journal · doi:10.1037/cpb0000012 · Cited by 48
Stereotypes and false consensus: How financial professionals predict risk preferences
Roth, B., & Voskort, A. (2014) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.05.006 · Cited by 47
Pushing away from representative advice: Advice taking, anchoring, and adjustment
Rader, C. A., Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.05.004 · Cited by 47
Cabitza, F., Campagner, A., Angius, R., Natali, C., & Reverberi, C. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581095 · Cited by 51
When is helping behavior unhelpful? A conceptual analysis and research agenda
Dalal, R., & Sheng, Z. (2019) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.009 · Cited by 42
Self-citationReceptiveness to advice, cognitive ability, and technology adoption
Barham, B. L., Chavas, J., Fitz, D., & Schechter, L. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.12.025 · Cited by 53
The Bad Thing About Good Advice: Understanding When and How Advice Exacerbates Overconfidence
Soll, J. B., Palley, A. B., & Rader, C. A. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.3987 · Cited by 45
Examining Cultural Similarities and Differences in Responses to Advice
Feng, B., & Feng, H. (2012) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650211433826 · Cited by 49
Small steps to accuracy: Incremental belief updaters are better forecasters
Atanasov, P. D., Witkowski, J., Ungar, L., Mellers, B. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.02.001 · Cited by 45
Criscuolo, P., Dahlander, L., Grohsjean, T., & Salter, A. J. (2021) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2020.1413 · Cited by 47
Restrictiveness and guidance in support systems
Goodwin, P., Fildes, R. A., Lawrence, M. J., & Stephens, G. (2010) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2010.07.001 · Cited by 45
The persuasive power of knowledge: Testing the confidence heuristic.
Pulford, B. D., Colman, A. M., Buabang, E. K., & Krockow, E. M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000471 · Cited by 44
Prahl, A., & Swol, L. M. V. (2021) · Human-Machine Communication · doi:10.30658/hmc.2.11 · Cited by 51
Wang, W., & Benbasat, I. (2012) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0445 · Cited by 42
Think twice and then: Combining or choosing in dialectical bootstrapping?
Herzog, S. M., & Hertwig, R. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0034054 · Cited by 44
Integrating advice and experience: Learning and decision making with social and nonsocial cues.
Collins, E. C., Percy, E. J., Smith, E. R., & Kruschke, J. K. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022982 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bonaccio, Silvia
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-151
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148237550
- Cited by
- 1,011
- References
- 171
- Citations by year
- 2026: 91 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- advice taking, advice-giving, decision-making, decision accuracy, confidence, organizational behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
