The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 171 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Individuals frequently discount recommendations that contradict their prior judgment, even when those recommendations are objectively accurate (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Even when external advice is objectively accurate, decision makers frequently maintain their original judgment, especially when that advice contradicts their prior beliefs or professional intuition.”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“This finding differs from the expectation that experienced judges may be more resistant to advice because they can generate more internal arguments supporting their initial view (Yaniv 2004;Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Expertise may further amplify this discounting behavior.Individuals who perceive themselves as highly competent generally show stronger resistance to external advice (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Research indicates that convergent advice from multiple sources increases perceived validity and strengthens confidence in external recommendations (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006;Soll et al. 2022).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Disagreement among advisors reduces trust and decreases the weight assigned to external inputs (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006;Wanzel et al. 2017;Yaniv et al. 2009).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Unfortunately, humans tend to err in these estimates, often overestimating their chance of being correct, leading to an implicit, unwarranted preference for their own opinions, an ego bias [52][53][54][55][56][57] .”
From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
In the citing paper
“Trust was measured as CADx prediction utilization, defined as an endoscopist's willingness to follow the CADx prediction when the endoscopist initially disagreed with the CADx prediction 9,10”
From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Unsolicited advice can be received poorly and considered intrusive, whereas explicitly solicited advice can be considered cooperative and helpful.10”
From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,243
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · Cited by 6,903
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,840
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1986) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.12381759.38 · Cited by 4,544
Connolly, T., & Axelrod, R. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392957 · Cited by 3,947
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 171 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Cooper, R. S. (1991). Information processing in the judge–adviser system of group decision-making. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Dalal, R. S. (2001). The effect of expert advice and financial incentives on cooperation. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Gibbons, A. M. (2003). Alternative forms of advice in natural decision settings. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Griffeth, 1995, The employee turnover process, Vol. 13, 245
- Jungermann, H. (1999). Advice-giving and taking. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32). Maui, HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE). [CD-ROM]. www.gp.tu-berlin.de/Users/j/jungermann/Publications/Advice%20giving.html.
- Lualhati, J.C. (1992). Performance forecast accuracy and confidence in a judge–adviser decision system. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (11th ed.) (2003). [Electronic version]. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
- Mount, 1995, The Big Five Personality Dimensions: implications for research and practice in human resources management, Vol. 13, 153
- Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (Eds.) (2001). Shared cognition [Special Issue]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,003
How numeric advice precision affects advice taking
Schultze, T., & Loschelder, D. D. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2211 · Cited by 23
Keck, S., & Tang, W. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3688 · Cited by 22
Carlson, C. L. (2016) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570314.2016.1142112 · Cited by 25
MacGeorge, E. L., Guntzviller, L. M., Branch, S. E., & Yakova, L. (2015) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x15611920 · Cited by 23
Behavioural consequences of vaccination recommendations: An experimental analysis
BOHM, R. M., Meier, N. W., Korn, L., & Betsch, C. (2017) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.3584 · Cited by 23
The Role of Anticipated Regret in Advice Taking
Tzini, K., & Jain, K. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2048 · Cited by 22
Effects of dominance transitions on advice adherence in professional service conversations
Wang, H. S., & Yim, C. K. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00664-8 · Cited by 23
Field Evidence about Auditors' Experiences in Consulting with Forensic Specialists
Asare, S. K., & Wright, A. M. (2017) · Behavioral Research in Accounting · doi:10.2308/bria-51787 · Cited by 25
Reasoning about social sources to learn from actions and outcomes.
Hawthorne-Madell, D., & Goodman, N. D. (2017) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000088 · Cited by 24
The Evolutionary Rationality of Social Learning
McElreath, R. L., Wallin, A., & Fasolo, B. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0014 · Cited by 23
Vigilant conservatism in evaluating communicated information
Trouche, E., Johansson, P., Hall, L., & Mercier, H. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188825 · Cited by 24
The Effect of Advice Valence on the Perceived Credibility of Data Analytics
Chen, C. X., Hudgins, R., & Wright, W. F. (2021) · Journal of Management Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jmar-2020-015 · Cited by 21
Knowing the crowd within: Metacognitive limits on combining multiple judgments
Fraundorf, S. H., & Benjamin, A. S. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.002 · Cited by 21
Influence of event characteristics on assessing credibility and advice-taking
Johnson, H. H., & Johnson, M. D. (2017) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/jmp-05-2016-0146 · Cited by 24
Harvey, N., & Smithers, S. G. (2018) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.03.007 · Cited by 21
Lee, H. K., Lee, J. S., & Keil, M. (2018) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2018.1523604 · Cited by 22
Flexible use of confidence to guide advice requests
Carlebach, N., & Yeung, N. (2022) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105264 · Cited by 23
Overconfidence and the Attainment of Status in GroupsPreprint
Anderson, C., & Brion, S. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 20
Some Hedonic Consequences of Perspective‐Taking in Recommending
Yeomans, M. (2018) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1050 · Cited by 20
How do learning ability, advice from experts and peers shape decision making?
Läpple, D., & Barham, B. L. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.010 · Cited by 20
Human preferences toward algorithmic advice in a word association task
Bogert, E., Lauharatanahirun, N., & Schecter, A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18638-2 · Cited by 26
Pilditch, T. D., & Custers, R. (2017) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.04.006 · Cited by 22
The implicit honesty premium: Why honest advice is more persuasive than highly informed advice.
Haran, U., & Shalvi, S. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000677 · Cited by 20
The unexpected power of positivity: Predictions versus decisions about advisor selection.
Hur, J. D., Ruttan, R. L., & Shea, C. T. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000756 · Cited by 22
Strategically overconfident (to a fault): How self-promotion motivates advisor confidence.
Zant, A. B. V. (2021) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000879 · Cited by 20
Gesser‐Edelsburg, A., Zemach, M., & Hijazi, R. (2021) · Risk Management and Healthcare Policy · doi:10.2147/rmhp.s311334 · Cited by 21
The opponent process theory of leadership succession
Hollenbeck, J. R., DeRue, D. S., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2014) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386614530606 · Cited by 22
Carbonell, G., Meshi, D., & Brand, M. (2018) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2018.1517636 · Cited by 20
Social information use and social information wastePreprint
Morin, O., Jacquet, P. O., Vaesen, K., & Acerbi, A. (2020) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/rqcdf · Cited by 20
Chen, Q. Q., Lin, L. M., & Yi, Y. (2025) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104281 · Cited by 21
Creating human-technology synergies at the organizational frontlines
Danatzis, I., Field, J. M., & Subramony, M. V. (2025) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115562 · Cited by 24
Differential diagnosis checklists reduce diagnostic error differentially: A randomised experiment
Kämmer, J. E., Schauber, S. K., Hautz, S. C., Stroben, F., & Hautz, W. E. (2021) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14596 · Cited by 20
Pescetelli, N., Barkoczi, D., & Cebrián, M. (2022) · Applied Network Science · doi:10.1007/s41109-022-00488-6 · Cited by 22
Trust-Your-Doctor: A Simple Heuristic in Need of a Proper Social Environment
Wegwarth, O., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0003 · Cited by 20
Jodlbauer, B., & Jonas, E. (2010) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.05.008 · Cited by 22
Some People Heed Advice Less than Others: Agency (but Not Communion) Predicts Advice Taking
Schultze, T., Gerlach, T. M., & Rittich, J. C. (2017) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2065 · Cited by 22
Beach, D., Schäfer, D., & Smeets, S. (2019) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12372 · Cited by 21
Cells, circuits, and choices: Social influences on perceptual decision making
Mojzisch, A., & Krug, K. (2008) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.8.4.498 · Cited by 21
Simple Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Social Behavior
Hertwig, R., & Hoffrage, U. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0001 · Cited by 20
Quantifying machine influence over human forecasters
Abeliuk, A., Benjamin, D. M., Morstatter, F., & Galstyan, A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72690-4 · Cited by 18
Xu, Z., Song, T., & Lee, Y.-C. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103455 · Cited by 18
Incentives, Framing, and Reliance on Algorithmic Advice: An Experimental Study
Greiner, B., Grünwald, P., Lindner, T., Lintner, G., & Wiernsperger, M. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.02777 · Cited by 19
Do managers trust AI? An exploratory research based on social comparison theory
Rizzo, C., Bagna, G., & Tuček, D. (2024) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2023-1971 · Cited by 24
A Framework for Decision Making in Couples across Adulthood
Queen, T. L., Berg, C. A., & Lowrance, W. T. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417148-0.00018-2 · Cited by 18
Wischnewski, M., Harold Bekkering, A., & Schutter, D. J. L. G. (2018) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-018-0566-8 · Cited by 18
Meißner, P. (2014) · BuR - Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-014-0005-9 · Cited by 18
The effectiveness of imperfect weighting in advice taking
Bednarik, P., & Schultze, T. (2015) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004666 · Cited by 18
Swol, L. M. V., Paik, J. E., & Prahl, A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190630188.013.2 · Cited by 18
Sussman, R., Tan, L. Q., & Kormos, C. E. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-815965-1.00014-4 · Cited by 17
Social Influence under uncertainty in interaction with peers, robots and computers
Zonca, J., Folsø, A., & Sciutti, A. (2023) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-022-00959-x · Cited by 18
An interdisciplinary perspective on AI-supported decision making in medicine
Ammeling, J., Aubreville, M., Fritz, A., Kießig, A., Krügel, S., & Uhl, M. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102791 · Cited by 20
Predicting Civil Jury Verdicts: How Attorneys Use (and Misuse) a Second Opinion
Jacobson, J., Dobbs‐Marsh, J., Liberman, V., & Minson, J. A. (2011) · Journal of Empirical Legal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01229.x · Cited by 17
Living longer with help from others: Seeking advice lowers mortality risk
Delaney, R. K., Turiano, N. A., & Strough, J. (2016) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105316664133 · Cited by 19
Disparate foundations of scientists’ policy positions on contentious biomedical research
Edelmann, A., Moody, J. W., & Light, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1613580114 · Cited by 17
The financial advice puzzle: The role of consumer heterogeneity in the advisor choice
Amaral, C., & Kolsarici, C. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102014 · Cited by 18
What Goes Down When Advice Goes Up: Younger Advisers Underestimate Their Impact
Zhang, T., & North, M. S. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167220905221 · Cited by 20
Ethical leadership and ambidexterity in young firms: examining the CEO-TMT Interface
Ling, Y., Hammond, M. M., & Wei, L. (2020) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-020-00695-6 · Cited by 18
Team Structure: Tight Versus Loose Coupling in Task-Oriented Groups
Hollenbeck, J. R., & Spitzmüller, M. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0023 · Cited by 17
Joe, J. R., & Wu, Y. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2957840 · Cited by 17
Simonov, A., Sacher, S., Dube, J.-P. H., & Biswas, S. (2020) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3604214 · Cited by 278
Diplomacy by committee: Assessing resolve and costly signals in group settings
Wayne, C. N., Mukaigawara, M., Kertzer, J. D., & Holmes, M. (2024) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12892 · Cited by 16
Find the Good. Seek the Unity: A Hidden Markov Model of Human-AI Delegation Dynamics
Liu, J., Yue, W. T., Leung, A. C. M., & Zhang, X. (2022) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2024/18232 · Cited by 16
Risk Preference Elicitation and Financial Advice Taking
Streich, D. J. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1080/15427560.2021.1974444 · Cited by 16
Homburg, C., Schyma, T. R., Hohenberg, S., Atefi, Y., & Ruhnau, R.-C. M. (2023) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-023-00939-1 · Cited by 21
Mawuena, E. K., & Wilkinson, A. J. (2024) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2024.2342294 · Cited by 21
Business advice and lending in small firms
Rostamkalaei, A., & Freel, M. (2016) · Environment and Planning C Politics and Space · doi:10.1177/0263774x16665620 · Cited by 16
Tell Me What I Wanted to Hear: Confirmation Effect in Lay Evaluations of Financial Expert Authority
Zaleśkiewicz, T., & Gąsiorowska, A. (2018) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12145 · Cited by 17
Evaluating Machines by their Real-World Language UsePreprint
Zellers, R., Holtzman, A., Clark, E., Qin, L., Farhadi, A., & Choi, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 15
Langer, M., König, C. J., Back, C., & Hemsing, V. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/r9y3t · Cited by 16
Do Robo-Advisors Make Us Better Investors?Preprint
Back, C., Morana, S., & Spann, M. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3777387 · Cited by 16
Aldighrir, W. M. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-024-06862-0 · Cited by 15
Effects of communication styles on acceptance of recommendations in intercultural collaboration
Li, H., Rau, P. P., Salvendy, G., Chen, C., Huebner, D. R., & Frey, D. (2014) · Cited by 15
Dunning, D. A. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429203787-12 · Cited by 15
The One-Man Show: The Effect of Joint Decision-Making on Investor Overconfidence
Piehlmaier, D. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucac054 · Cited by 16
Sincere or Motivated? Partisan Bias in Advice-taking
Zhang, Y., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/jdm.2023.28 · Cited by 16
Palmeira, M. M. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.11.009 · Cited by 16
Outcome feedback reduces over-forecasting of inflation and overconfidence in forecasts
Niu, X., & Harvey, N. (2022) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500009050 · Cited by 15
Learning When to Advise Human Decision Makers
Noti, G., & Chen, Y. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2023/339 · Cited by 25
Indecision and the construction of self
Newark, D. A. (2014) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.07.005 · Cited by 19
Are Depressed People More or Less Susceptible to Informational Social Influence?
Hofheinz, C., Germar, M., Schultze, T., Michalak, J., & Mojzisch, A. (2017) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-017-9848-7 · Cited by 15
Do Easterners and Westerners Treat Contradiction Differently?
Mercier, H., Zhang, J., Qu, Y., Lu, P., & der Henst, J. V. (2015) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12342140 · Cited by 15
A reinforcement sensitivity theory view of seeking behaviors at work: A meta‐analysis
Sherf, E. N., Gilliam, N., & McElroy, T. (2024) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12579 · Cited by 15
Diffusion of Responsibility for Actions With Advice
Cooper, D. A. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2415 · Cited by 14
Selective Social Belief Revision in Young Children
Miosga, N., Schultze, T., Schulz‐Hardt, S., & Hannes Rakoczy, B. (2020) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2020.1781127 · Cited by 14
Cultural Variations in Reasons for Advice Seeking
Ji, L., Zhang, N., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Harper, G., Khei, M., & Li, J. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1995 · Cited by 14
Secchi, D., & Bardone, E. (2013) · International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior · doi:10.1108/ijotb-16-04-2013-b004 · Cited by 14
How cognitive and affective aspects can influence the outcome of the group decision‐making process
Carneiro, J., Martinho, D., Marreiros, G., & Nováis, P. (2017) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.12257 · Cited by 14
Brown, T. J., & Fanning, K. (2018) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-52295 · Cited by 14
Advice taking by groups: The effects of consensus seeking and member opinion differences
Larson, J. R., Tindale, R. S., & Yoon, Y. (2019) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430219871349 · Cited by 14
Leffrang, D., & Muller, O. (2021) · IEEE Workshop on TRust and EXpertise in Visual Analytics (TREX) · doi:10.1109/trex53765.2021.00009 · Cited by 14
Alaybek, B., Dalal, R. S., & Dade, B. (2022) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-022-09843-x · Cited by 22
Self-citationAre there “His” and “Her” Types of Decisions? Exploring Gender Differences in the Confirmation Bias
Traut‐Mattausch, E., Jonas, E., Frey, D., & Zanna, M. P. (2011) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0009-2 · Cited by 14
Ostracism Reduces Reliance on Poor Advice from Others during Decision Making
Byrne, K. A., Tibbett, T. P., Laserna, L. N., Carter‐Sowell, A. R., & Worthy, D. A. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1886 · Cited by 15
The Effects of Disorganization on Goals and Problem Solving
Herath, D. B., Secchi, D., & Homberg, F. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18153-0_4 · Cited by 14
Age and Adaptation: Stronger Decision Updating about Real World Risks in Older Age
Rolison, J. J., Wood, S. A., & Hanoch, Y. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12710 · Cited by 14
Small talk, big impact – The influence of casual collegial advice on purchasing negotiations
Lu, J., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2019) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100576 · Cited by 14
The influence of peer attitude and inherent scepticism on auditors’ sceptical judgments
Ying, S. X., Patel, C., & Pan, P. (2019) · Accounting and Business Research · doi:10.1080/00014788.2019.1686695 · Cited by 14
TuringAdvice: A Generative and Dynamic Evaluation of Language Use
Zellers, R., Holtzman, A., Clark, E., Qin, L., Farhadi, A., & Choi, Y. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.386 · Cited by 30
The corruptive force of AI-generated advicePreprint
Leib, M., Köbis, N., Rilke, R. M., Hagens, M., & Irlenbusch, B. (2021) · Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.07536 · Cited by 27
Olsen, K., Roepstorff, A., & Bang, D. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jqheu · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bonaccio, Silvia
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-151
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148237550
- Cited by
- 1,011
- References
- 171
- Citations by year
- 2026: 91 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- advice taking, advice-giving, decision-making, decision accuracy, confidence, organizational behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
