The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 171 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Individuals frequently discount recommendations that contradict their prior judgment, even when those recommendations are objectively accurate (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Even when external advice is objectively accurate, decision makers frequently maintain their original judgment, especially when that advice contradicts their prior beliefs or professional intuition.”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“This finding differs from the expectation that experienced judges may be more resistant to advice because they can generate more internal arguments supporting their initial view (Yaniv 2004;Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Expertise may further amplify this discounting behavior.Individuals who perceive themselves as highly competent generally show stronger resistance to external advice (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Research indicates that convergent advice from multiple sources increases perceived validity and strengthens confidence in external recommendations (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006;Soll et al. 2022).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Disagreement among advisors reduces trust and decreases the weight assigned to external inputs (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006;Wanzel et al. 2017;Yaniv et al. 2009).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Unfortunately, humans tend to err in these estimates, often overestimating their chance of being correct, leading to an implicit, unwarranted preference for their own opinions, an ego bias [52][53][54][55][56][57] .”
From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
In the citing paper
“Trust was measured as CADx prediction utilization, defined as an endoscopist's willingness to follow the CADx prediction when the endoscopist initially disagreed with the CADx prediction 9,10”
From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Unsolicited advice can be received poorly and considered intrusive, whereas explicitly solicited advice can be considered cooperative and helpful.10”
From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,243
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · Cited by 6,903
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,840
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1986) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.12381759.38 · Cited by 4,544
Connolly, T., & Axelrod, R. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392957 · Cited by 3,947
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 171 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Cooper, R. S. (1991). Information processing in the judge–adviser system of group decision-making. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Dalal, R. S. (2001). The effect of expert advice and financial incentives on cooperation. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Gibbons, A. M. (2003). Alternative forms of advice in natural decision settings. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Griffeth, 1995, The employee turnover process, Vol. 13, 245
- Jungermann, H. (1999). Advice-giving and taking. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32). Maui, HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE). [CD-ROM]. www.gp.tu-berlin.de/Users/j/jungermann/Publications/Advice%20giving.html.
- Lualhati, J.C. (1992). Performance forecast accuracy and confidence in a judge–adviser decision system. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (11th ed.) (2003). [Electronic version]. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
- Mount, 1995, The Big Five Personality Dimensions: implications for research and practice in human resources management, Vol. 13, 153
- Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (Eds.) (2001). Shared cognition [Special Issue]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment
Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A., & Moore, D. A. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005 · Cited by 2,061
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2643 · Cited by 1,230
“For example, people often give less weight to other people’s advice than they should when left to their own devices (see Bonaccio & Dalal, 2006); however, it is possible that people will commit to using another person’s advice in a constrained manner.”
BackgroundForecasting: theory and practice
Petropoulos, F., Apiletti, D., Assimakopoulos, V., Babaï, M. Z., Barrow, D. K., Taieb, S. B., Bergmeir, C., Bessa, R. J., Bijak, J., Boylan, J. E., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001 · Cited by 1,187
Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.
de Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., McKendrick, R., Smith, M. A. B., McKnight, P. E., Krueger, F., & Parasuraman, R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000092 · Cited by 614
Baird, A., & Maruping, L. M. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15882 · Cited by 512
Making sense of recommendations
Yeomans, M., Shah, A., Mullainathan, S., & Kleinberg, J. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2118 · Cited by 459
Merritt, S. M., & Ilgen, D. R. (2008) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x288574 · Cited by 527
Fildes, R. A., Goodwin, P., Lawrence, M. J., & Nikolopoulos, K. I. (2009) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2008.11.010 · Cited by 447
Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R., & Bartel, C. A. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0393 · Cited by 440
Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others’ opinions.
Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0015145 · Cited by 424
Jussupow, E., Spohrer, K., Heinzl, A., & Gawlitza, J. (2021) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2020.0980 · Cited by 422
Is Unbiased Financial Advice to Retail Investors Sufficient? Answers from a Large Field Study
Bhattacharya, U., Hackethal, A., Kaesler, S., Loos, B., & Meyer, S. (2012) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhr127 · Cited by 383
Alexiev, A. S., Jansen, J. J. P., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D., & Volberda, H. (2010) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00919.x · Cited by 377
The relative influence of advice from human experts and statistical methods on forecast adjustments
Önkal, D., Goodwin, P., Thomson, M. E., Gonul, M. S., & Pollock, A. C. (2009) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.637 · Cited by 331
The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy
See, K. E., Morrison, E. W., Rothman, N. B., & Soll, J. B. (2011) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.006 · Cited by 356
Will Humans-in-the-Loop Become Borgs? Merits and Pitfalls of Working with AI
Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/16553 · Cited by 368
Technology-enabled value co-creation: An empirical analysis of actors, resources, and practices
Breidbach, C. F., & Maglio, P. P. (2016) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.011 · Cited by 340
Power, competitiveness, and advice taking: Why the powerful don’t listen
Tost, L. P., Gino, F., & Larrick, R. P. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.001 · Cited by 294
Understanding algorithm aversion: When is advice from automation discounted?
Prahl, A., & Van Swol, L. (2017) · Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1002/for.2464 · Cited by 308
Effects of task difficulty on use of advice
Gino, F., & Moore, D. A. (2006) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.539 · Cited by 288
Mannes, A. E., Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036677 · Cited by 275
Gino, F., Brooks, A. W., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0026413 · Cited by 277
Construal Level Theory in Organizational Research
Wiesenfeld, B. M., Reyt, J.-N., Brockner, J., & Trope, Y. (2017) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113115 · Cited by 239
Blind in one eye: How psychological ownership of ideas affects the types of suggestions people adopt
Baer, M., & Brown, G. (2012) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.01.003 · Cited by 237
Biases in future-oriented Delphi studies: A cognitive perspective
Winkler, J., & Moser, R. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.021 · Cited by 230
Simonov, A., Sacher, S., Dubé, J., & Biswas, S. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27237 · Cited by 238
Three Challenges for AI-Assisted Decision-Making
Steyvers, M., & Kumar, A. (2024) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231181102 · Cited by 217
Smart People Ask for (My) Advice: Seeking Advice Boosts Perceptions of Competence
Brooks, A. W., Gino, F., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2054 · Cited by 225
A Distinct Role of the Temporal-Parietal Junction in Predicting Socially Guided Decisions
Carter, R. M., Bowling, D. L., Reeck, C., & Huettel, S. A. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1219681 · Cited by 238
The Influences of Message and Source Factors on Advice Outcomes
Feng, B., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2010) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650210368258 · Cited by 225
Improving the Delphi process: Lessons from social psychological research
Bolger, F., & Wright, G. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.007 · Cited by 218
Appropriate Reliance on AI Advice: Conceptualization and the Effect of Explanations
Schemmer, M., Kuehl, N., Benz, C., Bartos, A., & Satzger, G. (2023) · Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3581641.3584066 · Cited by 208
Confirmation bias in the utilization of others’ opinion strength
Kappes, A., Harvey, A. H., Lohrenz, T., Montague, P. R., & Sharot, T. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0549-2 · Cited by 186
Adaptive social networks promote the wisdom of crowds
Almaatouq, A., Noriega-Campero, A., Alotaibi, A., Krafft, P. M., Moussaïd, M., & Pentland, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1917687117 · Cited by 185
How Gullible are We? A Review of the Evidence from Psychology and Social Science
Mercier, H. (2017) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000111 · Cited by 194
Do we listen to advice just because we paid for it? The impact of advice cost on its use
Gino, F. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.03.001 · Cited by 185
Keding, C., & Meissner, P. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120970 · Cited by 168
Are We Wise About the Wisdom of Crowds? The Use of Group Judgments in Belief Revision
Mannes, A. E. (2009) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1031 · Cited by 170
The Costs and Benefits of Calculation and Moral Rules
Bennis, W. M., Medin, D. L., & Bartels, D. M. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610362354 · Cited by 161
Expert biases in technology foresight. Why they are a problem and how to mitigate them
Bonaccorsi, A. J., Apreda, R., & Fantoni, G. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119855 · Cited by 162
What types of advice do decision-makers prefer?
Dalal, R. S., & Bonaccio, S. (2010) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.11.007 · Cited by 169
Self-citationThe Neural Basis of Following Advice
Biele, G., Rieskamp, J., Krugel, L. K., & Heekeren, H. R. (2011) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001089 · Cited by 157
No decision-maker is an Island: integrating expert advice with information acquisition
Schrah, G. E., Dalal, R. S., & Sniezek, J. A. (2006) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.514 · Cited by 159
Self-citationSoliciting Resources from Others: An Integrative Review
Lim, J. H., Tai, K., Bamberger, P. A., & Morrison, E. W. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0034 · Cited by 159
Kadous, K., Leiby, J., & Peecher, M. E. (2013) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-50529 · Cited by 138
Humans rely more on algorithms than social influence as a task becomes more difficult
Bogert, E., Schecter, A., & Watson, R. T. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87480-9 · Cited by 144
Desirability bias in foresight: Consequences for decision quality based on Delphi results
Ecken, P., Gnatzy, T., & von der Gracht, H. A. (2011) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.05.006 · Cited by 146
Kim, S. S. Y., Liao, Q. V., Vorvoreanu, M., Ballard, S., & Vaughan, J. W. (2024) · The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658941 · Cited by 147
Expert Financial Advice Neurobiologically “Offloads” Financial Decision-Making under Risk
Engelmann, J. B., Capra, C. M., NOUSSAIR, C. N., & Berns, G. S. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004957 · Cited by 135
Bias Blind Spot: Structure, Measurement, and Consequences
Scopelliti, I., Morewedge, C. K., McCormick, E., Min, H. L., Lebrecht, S., & Kassam, K. S. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2096 · Cited by 183
Designing a Requirement Mining System
Meth, H., Mueller, B., & Maedche, A. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00408 · Cited by 123
Simple Heuristics in a Social World
Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U., & the, A. R. G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.001.0001 · Cited by 131
Exploring the digitalization impact on consumer decision-making in retail banking
Pousttchi, K., & Dehnert, M. (2018) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-017-0283-0 · Cited by 139
The development of adaptive conformity in young children: effects of uncertainty and consensus
Morgan, T. J. H., Laland, K. N., & Harris, P. L. (2014) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12231 · Cited by 138
An Integrative Perspective on Algorithm Aversion and Appreciation in Decision-Making
Jussupow, E., Benbasat, I., & Heinzl, A. (2024) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2024/18512 · Cited by 165
Testing Advice Response Theory in Interactions With Friends
MacGeorge, E. L., Guntzviller, L. M., Hanasono, L. K., & Feng, B. (2013) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650213510938 · Cited by 130
Hau, L. N., Pham, T.-A. N., & Thúy, P. N. (2016) · Service Business · doi:10.1007/s11628-016-0307-4 · Cited by 129
Langer, M., König, C. J., Back, C., & Hemsing, V. (2022) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-022-09829-9 · Cited by 157
Sah, S., Moore, D. A., & MacCoun, R. J. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.02.001 · Cited by 131
Human Decision Making and Recommender Systems
Chen, L., de Gemmis, M., Felfernig, A., Lops, P., Ricci⋆, F., & Semeraro, G. M. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/2533670.2533675 · Cited by 134
Equality bias impairs collective decision-making across cultures
Mahmoodi, A., Bang, D., Olsen, K., Zhao, Y. A., Shi, Z., Broberg, K., Safavi, S., Han, S., Ahmadabadi, M. N., Frith, C., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1421692112 · Cited by 122
Reddy, S. T., Zegarek, M. H., Fromme, H. B., Ryan, M. S., Schumann, S.-A., & Harris, I. B. (2015) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-14-00461.1 · Cited by 120
Minson, J. A., Liberman, V., & Ross, L. D. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211410436 · Cited by 121
Human Decision Making with Machine Assistance: An Experiment on Bailing and Jailing
Grgić-Hlača, N., Engel, C., & Gummadi, K. P. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359280 · Cited by 113
Heyden, M. L. M., Doorn, S. V., Reimer, M., Bosch, F. A. J. V. D., & Volberda, H. (2013) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612470229 · Cited by 119
The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence.
Boldt, A., de Gardelle, V., & Yeung, N. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000404 · Cited by 110
It takes two to Tango: Households’ response to financial advice and the role of financial literacy
Stolper, O. A. (2017) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.04.014 · Cited by 110
How Expert Advice Influences Decision Making
Meshi, D., Biele, G., Korn, C. W., & Heekeren, H. R. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049748 · Cited by 107
The impact of information from similar or different advisors on judgment
Gino, F., Shang, J. Y., & Croson, R. T. A. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.08.002 · Cited by 110
Acknowledging uncertainty impacts public acceptance of climate scientists’ predictions
Howe, L. C., MacInnis, B., Krosnick, J. A., Markowitz, E. M., & Socolow, R. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0587-5 · Cited by 100
A postdecisional neural marker of confidence predicts information-seeking in decision-making
Desender, K., Murphy, P., Boldt, A., Verguts, T., & Yeung, N. (2019) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2620-18.2019 · Cited by 88
Förster, B., & von der Gracht, H. A. (2013) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.07.012 · Cited by 104
Hollenbeck, J. R., Ellis, A. P. J., Humphrey, S. E., Garza, A. S., & Ilgen, D. R. (2010) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.003 · Cited by 104
Ianiro-Dahm, P. M., Schermuly, C. C., & Kauffeld, S. (2012) · Coaching An International Journal of Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/17521882.2012.740489 · Cited by 116
Human Decision Making and Recommender Systems
Jameson, A., Willemsen, M. C., Felfernig, A., de Gemmis, M., Lops, P., Semeraro, G. M., & Chen, L. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_18 · Cited by 107
Beyond collective intelligence: Collective adaptation
Galešić, M., Barkoczi, D., Berdahl, A. M., Biro, D., Carbone, G., Giannoccaro, I., Goldstone, R. L., González, C., Kandler, A., Kao, A. B., et al. (2023) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2022.0736 · Cited by 121
The risk of algorithm transparency: How algorithm complexity drives the effects on the use of advice
Lehmann, C. A., Haubitz, C. B., Fügener, A., & Thonemann, U. W. (2022) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13770 · Cited by 100
Too arrogant for their own good? Why and when narcissists dismiss advice
Kausel, E. E., Culbertson, S. S., Leiva, P. I., Slaughter, J. E., & Jackson, A. (2015) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.07.006 · Cited by 109
Motivating Customers to Adhere to Expert Advice in Professional Services
Seiders, K., Flynn, A. G., Berry, L. L., & Haws, K. L. (2014) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670514539567 · Cited by 102
Big picture is better: The social implications of construal level for advice taking
Reyt, J.-N., Wiesenfeld, B. M., & Trope, Y. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.004 · Cited by 100
Combining statistical and judgmental forecasts via a web-based tourism demand forecasting system
Song, H., Gao, B. Z., & Lin, V. S. (2012) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.12.003 · Cited by 98
Lourenco, C. J., Dellaert, B. G. C., & Donkers, B. (2020) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2019.10.003 · Cited by 107
Özer, Ö., Subramanian, U., & Wang, Y. (2017) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2617 · Cited by 93
Judgmental aggregation strategies depend on whether the self is involved
Soll, J. B., & Mannes, A. E. (2010) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.05.003 · Cited by 94
Idealistic advice and pragmatic choice: A psychological distance account.
Danziger, S., Montal, R., & Barkan, R. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027013 · Cited by 91
Opinion Dynamics with Confirmation Bias
Allahverdyan, A. E., & Galstyan, A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099557 · Cited by 90
Artificial intelligence or human: when and why consumers prefer AI recommendations
Jin, F., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-01-2023-0022 · Cited by 109
Argote, L., Guo, J., Park, S., & Hahl, O. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1590 · Cited by 88
Simonov, A., Sacher, S., Dubé, J., & Biswas, S. (2021) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2021.1328 · Cited by 92
Minson, J. A., & Mueller, J. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611429132 · Cited by 93
Fügener, A., Walzner, D. D., & Gupta, A. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2024.05684 · Cited by 117
Relationship closeness predicts unsolicited advice giving in supportive interactions
Feng, B., & Magen, E. (2015) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407515592262 · Cited by 84
Influencing Financial Behavior: From Changing Minds to Changing Contexts
Dolan, P., Elliott, A., Metcalfe, R., & Vlaev, I. (2012) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1080/15427560.2012.680995 · Cited by 94
Harari, D., Parke, M. R., & Marr, J. C. (2021) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2019.0049 · Cited by 87
Social information use and social information waste
Morin, O., Jacquet, P. O., Vaesen, K., & Acerbi, A. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0052 · Cited by 80
Who needs explanation and when? Juggling explainable AI and user epistemic uncertainty
Jiang, J., Kahai, S. S., & Yang, M. H. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102839 · Cited by 92
Laker, L. F., Froehle, C. M., Windeler, J. B., & Lindsell, C. J. (2017) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12777 · Cited by 87
Lanz, L., Briker, R., & Gerpott, F. H. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05393-1 · Cited by 70
Yaniv, I., & Choshen‐Hillel, S. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.740 · Cited by 80
Li, Y., Li, N., Guo, J., Li, J., & Harris, T. B. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0212 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bonaccio, Silvia
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-151
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148237550
- Cited by
- 1,011
- References
- 171
- Citations by year
- 2026: 91 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- advice taking, advice-giving, decision-making, decision accuracy, confidence, organizational behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
