The DOI matches its Crossref record; 165 of the 171 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Individuals frequently discount recommendations that contradict their prior judgment, even when those recommendations are objectively accurate (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Even when external advice is objectively accurate, decision makers frequently maintain their original judgment, especially when that advice contradicts their prior beliefs or professional intuition.”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“This finding differs from the expectation that experienced judges may be more resistant to advice because they can generate more internal arguments supporting their initial view (Yaniv 2004;Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Expertise may further amplify this discounting behavior.Individuals who perceive themselves as highly competent generally show stronger resistance to external advice (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Research indicates that convergent advice from multiple sources increases perceived validity and strengthens confidence in external recommendations (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006;Soll et al. 2022).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Disagreement among advisors reduces trust and decreases the weight assigned to external inputs (Bonaccio and Dalal 2006;Wanzel et al. 2017;Yaniv et al. 2009).”
From When Recruiters Meet Algorithms: Advice Taking and Bias in AI‐Assisted Recruitment (2026) · cites this paper as Bonaccio and Dalal 2006
In the citing paper
“Unfortunately, humans tend to err in these estimates, often overestimating their chance of being correct, leading to an implicit, unwarranted preference for their own opinions, an ego bias [52][53][54][55][56][57] .”
From Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
In the citing paper
“Trust was measured as CADx prediction utilization, defined as an endoscopist's willingness to follow the CADx prediction when the endoscopist initially disagreed with the CADx prediction 9,10”
From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Unsolicited advice can be received poorly and considered intrusive, whereas explicitly solicited advice can be considered cooperative and helpful.10”
From Appropriate trust in artificial intelligence for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: the role of human/artificial intelligence interaction (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,243
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 · Cited by 6,903
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,839
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1986) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.12381759.38 · Cited by 4,544
Connolly, T., & Axelrod, R. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392957 · Cited by 3,947
Flagged first, then by citations
6 of the 171 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Cooper, R. S. (1991). Information processing in the judge–adviser system of group decision-making. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Dalal, R. S. (2001). The effect of expert advice and financial incentives on cooperation. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Gibbons, A. M. (2003). Alternative forms of advice in natural decision settings. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Griffeth, 1995, The employee turnover process, Vol. 13, 245
- Jungermann, H. (1999). Advice-giving and taking. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32). Maui, HI: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE). [CD-ROM]. www.gp.tu-berlin.de/Users/j/jungermann/Publications/Advice%20giving.html.
- Lualhati, J.C. (1992). Performance forecast accuracy and confidence in a judge–adviser decision system. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
- Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary (11th ed.) (2003). [Electronic version]. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
- Mount, 1995, The Big Five Personality Dimensions: implications for research and practice in human resources management, Vol. 13, 153
- Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (Eds.) (2001). Shared cognition [Special Issue]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,003
Reversing the Lens: How Can Followers Influence Their Leader's Behavior?
Lapierre, L. M., & Bremner, N. L. (2010) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-2584 · Cited by 8
Social Influence in Stock Markets
Andersson, M. (2009) · Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University) · Cited by 5
Hilken (2018) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20180907th · Cited by 4
Bolger, F., Rowe, G., Belton, I., Crawford, M. M., Hamlin, I., Sissons, A., Lūka, C. T. B., Vasilichi, A., & Wright, G. (2020) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/4ufzg · Cited by 5
Own and others' confidence in social information usePreprint
Gradassi, A., van den Bos, W., & Molleman, L. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/mqyu2 · Cited by 5
Good Advice is Beyond All Price, but What if it Comes from a Machine?Preprint
Hertz, N., & Wiese, E. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ajrv2 · Cited by 8
Forecast Value Added in Demand PlanningPreprint
Fildes, R. A., Goodwin, P., & Baets, S. D. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4558708 · Cited by 5
Luo, Y., Zhao, Z., Xu, X., Zhao, Y., & Feng, Y. (2025) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaf115 · Cited by 4
Sreejesh, S., & Singha, S. D. (2025) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104660 · Cited by 5
Competing Biases underlie Overconfidence and Underconfidence in LLMs
Kumaran, D., Fleming, S. M., Markeeva, L., Heyward, J., Banino, A., Mathur, M., Pascanu, R., Osindero, S., Martino, B. D., Veličković, P., et al. (2026) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-026-01217-9 · Cited by 29
Reisinger, D., Kogler, M. L., & Jäger, G. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.5136 · Cited by 4
Luo, X., & Pan, Y. (2023) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/tb-2023-0593 · Cited by 4
Normative or Confirmative: Effects of Information Quality and Redundancy in Decision Support Systems
Yaakov, Y. B., Denisova, M., Mulugeta, F., & Meyer, J. (2024) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208241302787 · Cited by 4
YANIT, M. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100682 · Cited by 4
Eliciting Advice Instead of Feedback Improves Developmental Input
Blunden, H., Kristal, A. S., Whillans, A. V., Yoon, J., Burd, H., Bremner, G., & Yeomans, M. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03207 · Cited by 4
Accountability and managerial advice-taking: comparing human and algorithmic advisers
Kotzian, P., Bauch, K. A., & Weißenberger, B. E. (2025) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-07-2024-1618 · Cited by 6
Dynamic fusion for ensemble of deep Q-network
Chan, P. P. K., Xiao, M., Qin, X., & Kees, N. (2020) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-020-01218-z · Cited by 4
I will listen to you if you match with me: the effect of regulatory fit on advice taking
Du, X., Jia, Q., Li, F., Wang, J., & Chen, G. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03571-4 · Cited by 4
Palmeira, M. M., & Spassova, G. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2382 · Cited by 4
Watson, R. L., & Morgan, T. J. H. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106066 · Cited by 8
Veltrop, D. B., Mostert, I., van Veen-Dirks, P. M. G., & de Haan, J. (2025) · Corporate Governance An International Review · doi:10.1111/corg.12643 · Cited by 4
Matić, J. J., Neumann, M., Kerscher, F., Linn, F. H., & de Vries, R. E. (2025) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-025-10026-7 · Cited by 5
Evaluating Advice: Self‐Presentational Biases between High and Low Self‐Monitors
Harnish, R. J., Bridges, K. R., & Krajci, M. D. (2012) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20520 · Cited by 4
The “Less-Is-More” Effect in Group Decision Making
Luan, S., Katsikopoulos, K. V., & Reimer, T. O. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0010 · Cited by 4
Referral types and peer activation: Who to ask?
Cheung, P., Greenacre, L., & Freeman, L. (2013) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2013.811282 · Cited by 4
Price Discrepancy Between Sellers and Buyers When Making Decisions for the Self and Others
Zhang, Z., Zhang, B., & Li, Z. (2016) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294116649144 · Cited by 3
Seeking advice from experts: A cautionary tale
Dillon, R. L., & Carlson, K. A. (2017) · IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) · doi:10.1109/aero.2017.7943801 · Cited by 4
Initial Expectations of Team Performance: Specious Speculation or Framing the Future?
Sleesman, D. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Spitzmüller, M., & Schouten, M. E. (2018) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496418767554 · Cited by 4
Boards of Advisors in Family Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises
van Helvert-Beugels, J., Gils, A. E. J. V., & Huybrechts, J. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77676-7_8 · Cited by 4
Behavioral Analysis of Human-Machine Interaction in the Context of Demand Planning Decisions
Lauer, T., Welsch, R., Abbas, S. R., & Henke, M. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20454-9_13 · Cited by 4
Foundations and Theoretical Perspectives of Distributed Team Cognition
Mcneese, M. D., Salas, E., & Endsley, M. R. (2020) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780429459795 · Cited by 6
The influence of food recommendations: Evidence from a randomized field experiment
Bookwala, K., Gallemore, C. T., & Gómez‐Miñambres, J. (2022) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.13106 · Cited by 4
Epistemic motivation facilitates advice seeking and utilization by groups
Yoon, Y., Larson, J. R., Tindale, R. S., & Ro, H. (2023) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12958 · Cited by 4
Testing the Social Function of Metacognition for Common‐Pool Resource Use
Fischer, H., Wijermans, N., & Schlüter, M. (2023) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13212 · Cited by 4
What if you are not Bayesian? The consequences for decisions involving risk
Goodwin, P., Önkal, D., & Stekler, H. O. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.027 · Cited by 4
The influence of advice-seeker’s gaze direction on advisor’s advice-giving
Duan, J., Bei, S. H. I., & Wang, X. (2019) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2019.01363 · Cited by 4
Mackinger, B., Jonas, E., & Mühlberger, C. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01112 · Cited by 4
Strategic Advice Provision in Repeated Human-Agent Interactions
Azaria, A., Rabinovich, Z., Kraus, S., Goldman, C. V., & Gal, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v26i1.8338 · Cited by 4
Consumer created reviews and ratings : the importance of word of mouth in information search
Gligorijevic, B. (2014) · QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) · Cited by 4
Help, I Need Somebody! Business and Technology Advice in Emerging Science-Based VenturesPreprint
Denoo, L., Boxstael, A. V., & Belz, A. P. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3739084 · Cited by 4
Trust and Financial AdvicePreprint
Burke, J., & Hung, A. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2794247 · Cited by 4
Organizational Structure and Organizational LearningPreprint
Puranam, P., & Maciejovsky, B. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2963250 · Cited by 4
Zhu, X., He, Y., Solanelles, P., & Cullen, K. L. (2025) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12689 · Cited by 3
How AI social responsibility shapes consumers’ brand advocacy
Shen, P., Peng, D., Zhu, A., & Xu, J. (2025) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-025-06344-z · Cited by 3
Justification optional: ChatGPT’s advice can still influence human judgments about moral dilemmas
Krügel, S., Ostermaier, A., & Uhl, M. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01005-6 · Cited by 3
Wang, Y., Yu, H., Zhang, L., Wu, Y., & Luo, S. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103798 · Cited by 3
Advice taking in medical decision making
Kostopoulou, O. (2026) · La Presse Médicale · doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2026.104360 · Cited by 3
Yonah, M., & Kessler, Y. (2021) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.173 · Cited by 4
Schultze, T., Treffenstädt, C., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2022) · Decision · doi:10.1037/dec0000194 · Cited by 3
Earlier social information has a stronger influence on judgments
Tump, A. N., Wollny-Huttarsch, D., Molleman, L., & Kurvers, R. H. J. M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50345-4 · Cited by 4
Turnley, J. G., Chew, P. A., & Perls, A. S. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29047-3_18 · Cited by 3
Stavrova, O. (2018) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550618789607 · Cited by 3
Impact of Loss and Gain Forecasting on the Behavior of Pricing Decision-making
Toma, I. L., Delen, D., & Moscato, G. F. (2020) · International Journal of Data Science and Analysis · doi:10.11648/j.ijdsa.20200601.12 · Cited by 3
Casner, S. M. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374518-7.00019-5 · Cited by 5
How and when phatic communion enhances advice taking
Chen, J., Guo, Y., & Duan, J. (2022) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12521 · Cited by 3
Argument evaluation and production in the correction of political innumeracy
Dockendorff, M., & Mercier, H. (2023) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2023.2259537 · Cited by 3
When advisors do not know what is best for advisees: Uncertainty inhibits advice giving
Zhu, R., Tang, H., Xue, J., Li, Y., Liang, Z., Wu, S., Su, S., & Liu, C. (2024) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.745 · Cited by 2
The Social Psychology of the Wisdom of Crowds (with a New Section on Recent Advances)
Larrick, R. P., Mannes, A. E., & Soll, J. B. (2024) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44424-1_7 · Cited by 3
Preferences for advisor agreement and accuracy
Jaquiery, M., & Yeung, N. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0311211 · Cited by 4
Karger, E., Rosenberg, J., Jacobs, Z., Hickman, M. G., & Tetlock, P. E. (2025) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2024.11.008 · Cited by 3
Disclosing interpersonal conflicts of interest: Revealing whom we like, but not whom we dislike
Effron, D. A., & Raj, M. (2021) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.01.005 · Cited by 3
Carnabuci, G., Nedkovski, V., & Guerci, M. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16640-2_2 · Cited by 3
Can Simple Heuristics Explain Moral Inconsistencies?
Fleischhut, N., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388435.003.0017 · Cited by 3
Bode, I., & Wilke, F. (2014) · KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie · doi:10.1007/s11577-014-0278-1 · Cited by 3
Measuring the economic value of loan advice
Taylor, N. (2012) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.08.006 · Cited by 3
Banks and Discrimination: How Far Can We Go with Competition? A Reply to Block, Snow, and Stringham
Secchi, D. (2011) · Business and Society Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8594.2011.00377.x · Cited by 3
MacMillan, K. (2013) · Scholarship@Western (Western University) · Cited by 3
Trust in online futures market: a study of Malaysia
Eslami, M., & Imomoh, E. (2016) · Qualitative Research in Financial Markets · doi:10.1108/qrfm-01-2015-0001 · Cited by 3
Online Neighborhood Watch: The Impact of Social Network Advice on Software Security Decisions
Freitas, B., Matrawy, A., & Biddle, R. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.1109/cjece.2016.2613961 · Cited by 3
Carneiro, J., Martinho, D., Marreiros, G., & Nováis, P. (2017) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56538-5_42 · Cited by 3
Taking Advice for Vocational Decisions: Regulatory Fit Effects
Kang, T., Li, W., Peiling, X., & Qian, P. (2018) · Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology · doi:10.1017/prp.2017.12 · Cited by 3
Understanding the (perverse) effects of disclosing conflicts of interest: A direct replication study
Sah, S. (2018) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2018.10.010 · Cited by 3
A One-Third Advice Rule Based on a Control-Theoretic Opinion Dynamics Model
Luo, Y., Iyengar, G., & Venkatasubramanian, V. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2019.2910261 · Cited by 3
Wang, D.-J., Lv, H., & Zhou, Y.-T. (2021) · Chinese Management Studies · doi:10.1108/cms-06-2020-0246 · Cited by 3
How to make project plans trustworthy: an investigation based on multi-criteria contractor selection
Ying, H., Zhang, S., Zhao, X., & Zhang, M. (2021) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2021.1961700 · Cited by 3
The Conflict Between Partnership and Fairness in the Decision of Whom to Help
Palmeira, M. M., & Gunasti, K. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05068-3 · Cited by 3
Framing Feedback Giving as Advice Giving Yields More Critical and Actionable Input
Yoon, J., Blunden, H., Kristal, A. S., & Whillans, A. V. (2019) · Cited by 3
Wang, Y., & Redmiles, D. (2021) · Automated Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10515-021-00283-0 · Cited by 3
Do investors optimize, follow heuristics, or listen to experts?Preprint
Gehrig, T. P., Güth, W., Levı́nský, R., & Popova, V. A. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 3
Blinded by Experience: Prior Experience, Negative News and Belief UpdatingPreprint
Staats, B. R., Diwas Singh, K. C., & Francesca Gino, B. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2642369 · Cited by 3
Receptiveness to Advice, Cognitive Ability, and Technology AdoptionPreprint
Barham, B. L., Chavas, J., Fitz, D., & Schechter, L. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2603484 · Cited by 3
Cultural Values Guide Consumers’ Deference to ExpertsPreprint
Johnson, S. G. B., Rodrigues, M., & Tuckett, D. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3214001 · Cited by 3
Outhuijse, A. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3183065 · Cited by 3
Identify Experts through Revealed Confidence: Application to Wisdom of CrowdsPreprint
Zhang, Y. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3739192 · Cited by 3
Taking algorithmic (vs. human) advice reveals different goals to othersPreprint
Efendić, E., de Calseyde, P. P. F. M. V., Bahník, Š., & Vranka, M. A. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bp24r · Cited by 3
Weighting ratings: Are people adjusting for bias in extreme reviews?
Ocean, N. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000497 · Cited by 3
The limits of personal experience
Ganuthula, V. R. R. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1365180 · Cited by 3
Li, J., Chen, P., Pan, J., & Zhu, C. (2024) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120938 · Cited by 2
A two-factor scale of perceived power
Kim, M., & May, F. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0319412 · Cited by 2
Improving Advisor Systems: Algorithms that Explain Themselves
Neumann, M., & Kuncel, N. R. (2025) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-025-10014-x · Cited by 2
Choi, Y., & Dormady, N. (2025) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109675 · Cited by 2
The Impact of Perceived Organizational Politics on Peer Voice Endorsement: A Dual Mediation Model
Qiu, P., Chen, T., Hu, L. P., & Zhou, H. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15070892 · Cited by 2
Learning Processes in the Judge–Advisor System: A Neglected Advantage of Advice Taking
Schultze, T., Stern, A., & Schulz‐Hardt, S. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.70029 · Cited by 2
Takamatsu, R. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2531285 · Cited by 2
Green-curious retail investors and unmediated interactions with GenAI
Boni, L. A. (2025) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2025.108725 · Cited by 6
The Role of Status Incongruence in Employee Responses to Participative Leadership
Byun, S., Yücel, İ., Richard, O. C., & Triana, M. D. C. (2025) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.70035 · Cited by 3
Sun, Z., & Ding, J. (2025) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/6901297 · Cited by 2
Context-Dependency of Trust in AI-based Systems
Krügel, S., Richter, F., & Uhl, M. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) · doi:10.1109/istas65609.2025.11269654 · Cited by 2
Similarity and Consistency in Algorithm‐Guided Exploration
Danwitz, L., Hornuf, L., Fehrler, S., Lin, H.-Y., Bao, Y., Dvorak, F., & von Helversen, B. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.70055 · Cited by 2
Chatbot or humanaut? How the source of advice impacts prosocial behavior
Babin, J. J., & Chauhan, H. S. (2026) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2026.102509 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bonaccio, Silvia
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-151
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148237550
- Cited by
- 1,011
- References
- 171
- Citations by year
- 2026: 91 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 54
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- advice taking, advice-giving, decision-making, decision accuracy, confidence, organizational behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
