CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 353Social and Intergroup PsychologyNames, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore

Jost, John T., Rudman, Laurie A., Blair, Irene V., Carney, Dana R., Dasgupta, Nilanjana, Glaser, Jack, Hardin, Curtis D.·2009·Research in Organizational Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.riob.2009.10.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.riob.2009.10.001

Cites

207 of 207 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implicit attitudes about gender, ethnicity, nationality and sexual orientation are widespread among the population worldwide.

    “Other biases tested include gender, ethnicity, nationality and sexual orientation; there is evidence that these implicit attitudes are widespread among the population worldwide and influence behaviour outside the laboratory [6, 7].”

    From Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

  • Implicit attitudes influence behaviour outside the laboratory.

    “Other biases tested include gender, ethnicity, nationality and sexual orientation; there is evidence that these implicit attitudes are widespread among the population worldwide and influence behaviour outside the laboratory [6, 7].”

    From Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

  • Other biases tested include gender, ethnicity, nationality and sexual orientation.

    “Other biases tested include gender, ethnicity, nationality and sexual orientation; there is evidence that these implicit attitudes are widespread among the population worldwide and influence behaviour outside the laboratory [6, 7].”

    From Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

  • The solidity of data revealing high levels of implicit bias among the general population suggests that publication bias and overlapping data are unlikely to have invalidated the conclusion that implicit bias is present in healthcare professionals.

    “The solidity of data revealing high levels of implicit bias among the general population suggest that this is unlikely to have invalidated the conclusion that implicit bias is present in healthcare professionals [6, 7].”

    From Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2017) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 210 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Jost, J. T., Rudman, L. A., Blair, I. V., Carney, D. R., Dasgupta, N., Glaser, J., & Hardin, C. D.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • City University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Jost, John T.
ORCID
Venue
Research in Organizational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009
Volume
29
Pages
39-69
ISSN
0191-3085 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.riob.2009.10.001
OpenAlex
W2111046715
Cited by
353
References
210
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 24
FWCI
49.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Research in Organizational Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
implicit bias, Implicit Association Test, implicit racism, implicit associations, behavior prediction, employment decisions, clinical decision-making, voting behavior, organizational management, nationality bias, gender bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review