Cited by 27Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisGlaucoma and retinal disorders

Four-year incidence of macular changes in the Barbados Eye Studies*1

LESKE, M·2004·Ophthalmology

Abstract

Objective To describe longitudinal macular changes in a black population after 4 years of follow-up.Design Population-based incidence study.Setting and participants The Barbados Incidence Study of Eye Diseases (BISED) reexamined the Barbados Eye Study cohort, which was based on a random sample of the country's residents, 40 to 84 years. The BISED included 3427 persons, or 85% of the eligible cohort.Main outcome measures Four-year incidence of macular changes, as determined by gradings of color stereoscopic macular photographs.Results Among black participants, the overall 4-year incidence of early macular changes (medium or large drusen or >20 small drusen with retinal pigment epithelium [RPE] atrophy or pigment) was 5.2% (95% confidence interval, 4.0%-6.6%) and tended to be higher in women (5.8%) than in men (4.1%). Incidence of related features was 5.2% for medium drusen (64-250 microm), 0.3% for drusen >250 microm, 1.1% for confluence, 0.5% for pigment, and 0.1% for RPE atrophy. Of the 2362 persons at risk for late macular changes (geographic atrophy, fluid, lipid, hemorrhage, disciform scar), exudative features developed in only 1 person in 4 years. Less than 1% of persons with early macular changes at baseline had disappearance of related features.Conclusions After 4 years, the development of severe macular disease was rare in this black population, and the incidence of early macular changes also was lower than in other populations. Results are consistent with the low risk of macular degeneration in persons of African descent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.07.003

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In persons of African origin living in the United States and Barbados, the prevalence of early AMD and soft drusen is slightly lower than in whites, but advanced AMD is rare.

    “Interestingly, in persons of African origin living in United States and Barbados, prevalence of early AMD and soft drusen is slightly lower than in whites, but advanced AMD is rare [34,35].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LESKE, M.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
LESKE, M
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
706-711
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138819034
Cited by
27
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Keywords
macular changes, macular degeneration, drusen, retinal pigment epithelium atrophy, geographic atrophy, incidence, Black population, African ancestry, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Barbados, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Incidence, Black People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review