Cited by 111Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

Pain tolerance as a predictor of outcome following multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: differential effects as a function of sex

Edwards, Robert R, Doleys, Daniel M, Lowery, Daniel, Fillingim, Roger B·2003·Pain

Abstract

Sex-related differences in the experience of clinical and experimental pain have been widely reported. Females are at elevated risk for developing several chronic pain conditions and women demonstrate greater sensitivity to noxious stimulation in the laboratory. However, relationships between responses to experimental noxious stimuli and the experience of clinical pain have not been well characterized. One previous study of healthy adults indicated that pain threshold and tolerance were associated with clinical pain among women but not men (i.e. females with lower pain threshold and tolerance reported more clinical pain). In the present investigation, relationships between pain tolerance and outcomes of treatment for chronic pain were evaluated in a sex-dependent manner. Ischemic pain tolerance was assessed prior to treatment in 171 chronic pain patients completing a pain management program. Outcomes were measured as changes in pain severity, affect, and pain-related disability. Over the course of treatment, women demonstrated greater improvement in pain-related disability while men showed more reduction in pain. Ischemic pain tolerance was related to outcome in a sex-specific fashion. Women with higher pain tolerances showed greater improvement in pain, more reduction in pain-related interference, and more increases in activity level than women with lower pain tolerances. In contrast, pain tolerance was not associated with positive treatment outcomes among men. These results indicate that experimental pain responses may be most clinically relevant for women, and that sex differences may exist in the determinants of pain-treatment outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2003.09.004

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edwards, R. R., Doleys, D. M., Lowery, D., & Fillingim, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Edwards, Robert R
Venue
Pain
Published
2003-12
Volume
106
Issue
3
Pages
419-426
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067929429
Cited by
111
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 06060)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE 12261, R29DE012261)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pain tolerance, sex differences, chronic pain, multidisciplinary pain management, ischemic pain, treatment outcomes, pain-related disability, pain intensity, pain interference, activity level
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Predictive Value of Tests, Regression Analysis, Sex Characteristics, Treatment Outcome, Pain Threshold, Pain Clinics, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review