Cited by 30Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentParasites and Host InteractionsInvertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms

iNOs expression is stimulated by the major surface protein (rWSP) from Wolbachia bacterial endosymbiont of Dirofilaria immitis following subcutaneous injection in mice

Morchón, R., Bazzocchi, C., López-Belmonte, J., Martín-Pacho, J.R., Kramer, L.H., Grandi, G., Simón, F.·2007·Parasitology International

Abstract

The bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia of several species of filarial nematodes plays an important role in the inflammatory pathology of filariasis. Nitric oxide (NO) production has also been implicated in the immune response during filarial infections. Here we present data indicating that a recombinant Wolbachia surface protein (rWSP) induces iNOs mRNA expression and NO production, as well as IFN-gamma and a Th1-type antibody response, in inoculated BALB/c mice. This effect is not observed when mice are inoculated with a recombinant heat shock protein from Wolbachia (GroEL).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.parint.2006.10.003

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In amicrofilaremic canine D. immitis infections, a Th1 response with lack of IL-10 expression and elevated iNOS and IgG2 production occurs.

    “a Th1 response characterized by a lack of IL-10 expression and elevated levels of expression of inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS) and IgG2 production occurs in amicrofilaremic canine infections (287).”
  • In microfilaremic canine D. immitis infections, a Th2 response with high IL-4 and IL-10 mRNAs and IgG1 production predominates.

    “A Th2 response characterized by high levels of interleukin 4 (IL-4) and IL-10 mRNAs and IgG1 production predominates in microfilaremic canine infections.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morchón, R., Bazzocchi, C., López-Belmonte, J., Martín-Pacho, J. R., Kramer, L. H., Grandi, G., & Simón, F.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University of Parma (IT)
Corresponding author
Simón, F.
Venue
Parasitology International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
71-75
ISSN
1383-5769 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006735468
Cited by
30
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasitology International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
Keywords
Wolbachia, Dirofilaria immitis, nitric oxide synthase, iNOS mRNA expression, nitric oxide production, filarial nematodes, filariasis, interferon-gamma, Th1 response, endosymbiotic bacteria, subcutaneous injection
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Bacterial, Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Inflammation, Interferon-gamma, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Nitric Oxide, Recombinant Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Symbiosis, Interleukin-4, Interleukin-10, Th1 Cells, Chaperonin 60, Wolbachia, Mice, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review