Cited by 106Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentParasites and Host InteractionsInvertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms

Wolbachia bacteria in filarial immunity and disease

Taylor, Mark J., Cross, Helen F., Ford, Louise, Makunde, Williams H., Prasad, G.B.K.S., Bilo, Katja·2001·Parasite Immunology

Abstract

Lymphatic filarial nematodes are infected with endosymbiotic Wolbachia bacteria. Lipopolysaccharide from these bacteria is the major activator of innate inflammatory responses induced directly by the parasite. Here, we propose a mechanism by which Wolbachia initiates acute inflammatory responses associated with death of parasites, leading to acute filarial lymphangitis and adverse reactions to antifilarial chemotherapy. We also speculate that repeated exposure to acute inflammatory responses and the chronic release of bacteria, results in damage to infected lymphatics and desensitization of the innate immune system. These events will result in an increased susceptibility to opportunistic infections, which cause acute dermatolymphangitis associated with lymphoedema and elephantiasis. The recognition of the contribution of endosymbiotic bacteria to filarial disease could be exploited for clinical intervention by the targeting of bacteria with antibiotics in an attempt to reduce the development of filarial pathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-3024.2001.00400.x

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Macrophages, together with neutrophils, play a key role in inflammation associated with onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis.

    “Together with neutrophils, the key role of macrophages in the inflammation associated with onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis has been demonstrated (61,421).”
  • Wolbachia interacts with macrophages via the same receptors as lipopolysaccharides (LPSs).

    “These findings suggest that Wolbachia interacts with macrophages via the same receptors as those for lipopolysaccharides (LPSs)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, M. J., Cross, H. F., Ford, L., Makunde, W. H., Prasad, G. B. K. S., & Bilo, K.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Mark J.
Venue
Parasite Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-07
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
401-409
ISSN
  • 0141-9838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3024
OpenAlex
W1967582595
Cited by
106
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasite Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
Keywords
Wolbachia, lymphatic filariasis, endosymbiotic bacteria, lipopolysaccharide, innate immunity, inflammation, lymphedema, elephantiasis, opportunistic infections
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Bacterial, Elephantiasis, Filarial, Filaricides, Humans, Leukocytes, Lipopolysaccharides, Symbiosis, Cytokines, Brugia malayi, Wolbachia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review