Cited by 200Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Sciences Research and Education

Internet information and medical consultations: Experiences from patients’ and physicians’ perspectives

Sommerhalder, Kathrin, Abraham, Andrea, Zufferey, Maria Caiata, Barth, Jürgen, Abel, Thomas·2009·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective Many patients use the Internet to obtain health-related information. It is assumed that health-related Internet information (HRII) will change the consultation practice of physicians. This article explores the strategies, benefits and difficulties from the patients' and physicians' perspective.Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted independently with 32 patients and 20 physicians. Data collection, processing and analysis followed the core principles of Grounded Theory.Results Patients experienced difficulties in the interpretation of the personal relevance and the meaning of HRII. Therefore they relied on their physicians' interpretation and contextualisation of this information. Discussing patients' concerns and answering patients' questions were important elements of successful consultations with Internet-informed patients to achieve clarity, orientation and certainty. Discussing HRII with patients was appreciated by most of the physicians but misleading interpretations by patients and contrary views compared to physicians caused conflicts during consultations.Conclusion HRII is a valuable source of knowledge for an increasing number of patients. Patients use the consultation to increase their understanding of health and illness. Determinants such as a patient-centred consultation and timely resources are decisive for a successful, empowering consultation with Internet-informed patients.Practical implications If HRII is routinely integrated in the anamnestic interview as a new source of knowledge, the Internet can be used as a link between physicians' expertise and patient knowledge. The critical appraisal of HRII during the consultation is becoming a new field of work for physicians.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.028

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sommerhalder, K., Abraham, A., Zufferey, M. C., Barth, J., & Abel, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
Corresponding author
Abel, Thomas
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
266-271
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067794810
Cited by
200
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ARBOR - Bern University of Applied Sciences Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
Keywords
physician-patient consultation, physician-patient communication, patient empowerment, medical history
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Health Education, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Patients, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Switzerland, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review