Cited by 19Cancer survivorship and careArt Therapy and Mental HealthDigital Mental Health Interventions

A randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of a self-administered psycho-educational intervention for patients with cancer

Körner, Annett, Roberts, Nicole, Steele, Russell J., Brosseau, Danielle C., Rosberger, Zeev·2019·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective Bibliotherapy refers to psychological self-help interventions that utilize treatment books to improve psychological well-being. Research supports bibliotherapy as an efficacious intervention for a variety of mental health problems. Yet, few studies have investigated bibliotherapy in psychosocial oncology. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to examine the efficacy of the NuCare intervention, delivered as a self-directed workbook, for enhancing empowerment, coping, and quality of life and reducing distress in patients with cancer.Methods Eighty-nine adult patients with cancer were randomized to receive the workbook for 6 weeks or the control condition, usual care. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline, and 10 weeks post-baseline.Results The increase of empowerment (main outcome) and quality of life and the decrease of distress in the NuCare group from pre-intervention to follow-up assessment differed significantly from the respective difference scores in the control group.Conclusions The self-administered NuCare workbook is a potentially cost-effective, minimal intervention addressing psychosocial needs of patients with cancer.Practice implications Evidence-based bibliotherapy can empower patients and has the promise of reducing the burden on the healthcare system while enhancing the immediacy of psychosocial support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.002

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Körner, A., Roberts, N., Steele, R. J., Brosseau, D. C., & Rosberger, Z.
Affiliations
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • The King's University (CA)
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Körner, Annett
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
102
Issue
4
Pages
735-741
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2903486135
Cited by
19
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (236623)
  • Psychosocial Oncology Research Training (PORT) program
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
bibliotherapy, psychoeducational intervention, cancer patients, self-help workbook, psycho-oncology, patient empowerment, coping, quality of life, distress, psychosocial support
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Bibliotherapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Power, Psychological, Quality of Life, Self Care, Stress, Psychological, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review