Cited by 53Cancer survivorship and careDigital Mental Health InterventionsMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Self-guided interventions for managing psychological distress in people with cancer–a systematic review

Open access
Ugalde, Anna, Haynes, Kerry, Boltong, Anna, White, Victoria, Krishnasamy, Meinir, Schofield, Penelope, Aranda, Sanchia, Livingston, Patricia·2017·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: People with cancer can experience psychological distress but do not always desire, or engage with, professional support to assist with managing distress. Interventions that are self-directed or guided by patients may hold promise as they allow patients to engage with interventions as they need. The objective of this review is to describe and appraise the evidence for effectiveness of self-guided interventions that aim to manage psychological distress in people with cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, PsychInfo and CINAHL identified 15 relevant papers, reporting on 14 studies. RESULTS: Of the interventions, three studies comprised hard-copy workbooks, six studies used resource packs, four were online resources and one was a brief multimedia resource. One study was adequately powered and demonstrated a positive effect. Almost all interventions required some level of facilitation. Distressed participants may benefit more from interventions. CONCLUSION: Self-guided interventions represent a potentially efficient way of delivering support for people affected by cancer, however evidence supporting them is lacking. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: There is a need to generate evidence to understand the impact of self-guided interventions for: i) the ideal delivery point in the disease trajectory, ii) patient groups, iii) intervention content and iv) type and mode of delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.009

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To date, the effects of self-guided stress management interventions at a meta-analytic level have generally been examined in samples of people with physical illness or adults seeking help for the management of work-related stress.

    “To date, the effects of self-guided stress management interventions at a meta-analytic level have generally been examined in samples of people with physical illness (Ugalde et al., 2017) or adults seeking help for the management of work-related stress (Richardson and Rothstein, 2008).”

    From Effects of self-guided stress management interventions in college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Ugalde et al., 2017

    The paper does review self-guided interventions for people with cancer, a physical illness (Introduction; study characteristics table). But its Methods explicitly say it used a narrative synthesis rather than meta-analytic procedures, contrary to the claim that this source examined effects at a meta-analytic level. The work-related-stress portion is attributed to a different citation and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although promising effects of internet interventions for cancer survivors have been documented concerning anxiety, depression, distress, fatigue, physical activity, symptom management, insomnia, sexual dysfunction, and quality of life, the overall benefit of such interventions for BCSs is still unclear.

    “Although promising effects of such interventions have been documented concerning anxiety, depression [25,26], distress [27], fatigue [28], physical activity [29], symptom management [30], insomnia [31,32], sexual dysfunction [33], and quality of life [34,35], the overall benefit of such interventions for BCSs is still unclear.”

    From Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness, Usability, and Feasibility of iNNOV Breast Cancer: Mixed Methods Study (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. J.P. Higgins, S. Green, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Wiley Online Library, 2008.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ugalde, A., Haynes, K., Boltong, A., White, V., Krishnasamy, M., Schofield, P., Aranda, S., & Livingston, P.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Ugalde, Anna
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
100
Issue
5
Pages
846-857
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2566490446
Cited by
53
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Deakin University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
self-guided intervention, psychological distress, cancer patients, distress management, online resources, resource pack, multimedia intervention, facilitation, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Adult, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Self Care, Stress, Psychological, Multimedia, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review