Cited by 7Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Development and validation of the food cue responsivity scale

Open access
Kang Sim, D. Eastern, Eichen, Dawn M., Strong, David R., Manzano, Michael A., Boutelle, Kerri N.·2023·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Food cues are ubiquitous in today's environment; however, there is heterogeneity as to the extent to which these cues impact eating behavior among individuals. This study examines the validity and reliability of the Food Cue Responsivity Scale (FCRS) to assess responsivity to distinct types of food cues. Items gathered from existing measures were combined in the FCRS to reflect two subdomains, uncontrolled eating behavior and cognitive rumination. The criterion validity of the FCRS was established using a paradigm that assesses psychophysiological responsivity to a craved food among adults with overweight or obesity. Higher overall FCRS scores were associated with greater physiological responsivity to food exposures. These findings may help identify specific phenotypes of individuals with overweight or obesity with high responsivity to food cues, which could be used to understand overeating and response to weight-loss programs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.114028

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Food Cue Responsivity Scale was developed by Sim and colleagues by combining items from pre-existing scales to assess reactivity to distinct types of food cues across uncontrolled eating behavior and cognitive rumination.

    “One example of a questionnaire that can be used to assess psychological manifestations of food cue reactivity is the Food Cue Responsivity Scale [70], which was recently developed by Sim and colleagues by combining items from pre-existing scales aimed at assessing reactivity to distinct types of food cues across two subdomains: uncontrolled eating behavior and cognitive rumination.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang Sim, D. E., Eichen, D. M., Strong, D. R., Manzano, M. A., & Boutelle, K. N.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
258
Pages
114028
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308560088
Cited by
7
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (K23DK114480, R01DK103554, UL1TR001442)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
cognitive rumination, food cravings, overweight, obesity, dietary habits, scale validation, weight loss response
MeSH terms
Cues, Feeding Behavior, Food, Humans, Obesity, Reproducibility of Results, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review