Cited by 548Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The power of food scale. A new measure of the psychological influence of the food environment

Lowe, Michael R., Butryn, Meghan L., Didie, Elizabeth R., Annunziato, Rachel A., Thomas, J. Graham, Crerand, Canice E., Ochner, Christopher N., Coletta, Maria C. +3 more·2009·Appetite

Abstract

This paper describes the psychometric evaluation of a new measure called the Power of Food Scale (PFS). The PFS assesses the psychological impact of living in food-abundant environments. It measures appetite for, rather than consumption of, palatable foods, at three levels of food proximity (food available, food present, and food tasted). Participants were 466 healthy college students. A confirmatory factor analysis replicated the three-factor solution found previously by Capelleri et al. [Capelleri, J. C., Bushmakin, A. G., Gerber, R. A., Leidy, N. K., Sexton, C., Karlsson, J., et al. (in press). Discovering the structure of the Power of Food Scale (PFS) in obese patients. International Journal of Obesity, 11, A165]. The PFS was found to have adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The PFS and the Restraint Scale were regressed on four self-report measures of overeating. The PFS was independently related to all four whereas the Restraint Scale was independently related to two. Expert ratings of items suggested that the items are an acceptable reflection of the construct that the PFS is designed to capture. The PFS may be useful as a measure of the hedonic impact of food environments replete with highly palatable foods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2009.05.016

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lowe, M. R., Butryn, M. L., Didie, E. R., Annunziato, R. A., Thomas, J. G., Crerand, C. E., Ochner, C. N., Coletta, M. C., Bellace, D., Wallaert, M., & Halford, J.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Swarthmore College (US)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Lowe, Michael R.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
114-118
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975829928
Cited by
548
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 24
FWCI
18.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
Power of Food Scale, food environment, food availability, palatable food, overeating, dietary restriction, Restraint Scale, psychometric validation, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Appetite, Eating, Environment, Female, Food, Food Preferences, Humans, Male, Obesity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Taste, Reproducibility of Results, Body Mass Index, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review