Cited by 38Neuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNerve injury and regeneration

Multiple beneficial effects of melanocortin MC4 receptor agonists in experimental neurodegenerative disorders: Therapeutic perspectives

Open access
Giuliani, Daniela, Ottani, Alessandra, Neri, Laura, Zaffe, Davide, Grieco, Paolo, Jochem, Jerzy, Cavallini, Gian Maria, Catania, Anna +1 more·2017·Progress in Neurobiology

Abstract

Melanocortin peptides induce neuroprotection in acute and chronic experimental neurodegenerative conditions. Melanocortins likewise counteract systemic responses to brain injuries. Furthermore, they promote neurogenesis by activating critical signaling pathways. Melanocortin-induced long-lasting improvement in synaptic activity and neurological performance, including learning and memory, sensory-motor orientation and coordinated limb use, has been consistently observed in experimental models of acute and chronic neurodegeneration. Evidence indicates that the neuroprotective and neurogenic effects of melanocortins, as well as the protection against systemic responses to a brain injury, are mediated by brain melanocortin 4 (MC 4) receptors, through an involvement of the vagus nerve. Here we discuss the targets and mechanisms underlying the multiple beneficial effects recently observed in animal models of neurodegeneration. We comment on the potential clinical usefulness of melanocortin MC 4 receptor agonists as neuroprotective and neuroregenerative agents in ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and Alzheimer's disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2016.11.004

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giuliani, D., Ottani, A., Neri, L., Zaffe, D., Grieco, P., Jochem, J., Cavallini, G. M., Catania, A., & Guarini, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Medical University of Silesia (PL)
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
Corresponding author
Guarini, Salvatore
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
148
Pages
40-56
ISSN
0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2558178881
Cited by
38
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
  • Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Modena
  • Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emila
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
melanocortin peptides, neuroprotection, neurogenesis, neurodegeneration, vagus nerve, ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, Alzheimer's disease, synaptic activity, learning and memory, nerve regeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Neuroprotective Agents, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Receptor, Melanocortin, Type 4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review