Cited by 99Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Altered functional connectivity of the insular cortex across prefrontal networks in cocaine addiction

Open access
Cisler, Josh M., Elton, Amanda, Kennedy, Ashley P., Young, Jonathan, Smitherman, Sonet, Andrew James, George, Kilts, Clinton D.·2013·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

Interoception is theorized to be an important process mediating substance use disorders, and the insular cortex is recognized as a core neural region supporting interoception. The purpose of this study was to compare the integration of the insular cortex into prefrontal-related resting-state networks between individuals with cocaine dependence and healthy controls. Participants comprised 41 patients with cocaine dependence and 19 controls who underwent a resting-state 3-T functional magnetic resonance imaging scan. Individuals with cocaine dependence demonstrated altered functional connectivity of the insular cortex, predominantly the right insular cortex, with all eight prefrontal-related resting-state networks identified through Independent Component Analysis (ICA). A conjunction analysis demonstrated that the right insular cortex was the neural region with the highest number of common group differences across the networks. There was no evidence that insular cortex connectivity commonly differed between groups for non-prefrontal-related networks. Further, seed-based functional connectivity analyses extended the network analyses and indicated that cocaine dependence was associated with greater connectivity of the right insula with the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, and bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. These data support the hypothesis that cocaine dependence is related to altered functional interactions of the insular cortex with prefrontal networks. The results suggest possible neural mechanisms by which the insular cortex and interoceptive information influence cognitive control and decision-making processes presumably mediated by prefrontal networks in the cocaine dependence process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.02.007

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar structural and behavioral defects of the PFC can be observed in kids with prenatal exposure to opioids, cocaine, amphetamines and other drugs-of-abuse.

    “Similar structural and behavioral defects of the PFC can be observed in kids with prenatal exposure to opioids, cocaine, amphetamines and other drugs-of-abuse [322–330].”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [326]

    The Methods (2.1 Participants; page not provided) describe adults aged 18–65 with cocaine dependence, and the Discussion (section 4; page not provided) reports altered insula–prefrontal functional connectivity in that group. Searches for prenatal exposure, children, opioids, and amphetamines found no passage addressing structural or behavioral PFC defects in prenatally exposed children. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB Spitzer Robert L Gibbon Miriam Williams Janet BW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Non-Patient Edition Biometrics Research 2002 New York New York State Psychiatric Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cisler, J. M., Elton, A., Kennedy, A. P., Young, J., Smitherman, S., Andrew James, G., & Kilts, C. D.
Affiliations
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Cisler, Josh M.
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
213
Issue
1
Pages
39-46
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040506524
Cited by
99
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH097784)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA025243, R01DA019999, T32DA022981)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR029883, UL1RR029884)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
cocaine dependence, insula, functional connectivity, resting-state networks, interoception, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus, cognitive control, decision-making, substance use disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review