Cited by 18Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCOVID-19 and Mental HealthDigital Mental Health Interventions

Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Live Online During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Feasibility Study

Riley, Timothy D., Roy, Siddhartha, Parascando, Jessica A., Wile, Kevin, LaGamma, Christina, Dong, Huamei, Zgierska, Aleksandra E.·2022·Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) live online during the COVID-19 shutdown. Design: Mixed-methods study using a sequential explanatory design. Settings/location: Cohorts 1-4 took place in-person and Cohorts 5-6 took place over Zoom following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Subjects: Participants were paying members of the general public enrolled in one of six live MBSR courses. Interventions: All MBSR courses followed the standard 8-week MBSR curriculum, led by experienced instructors. Outcome measures: Feasibility measured via class attendance, acceptability measured via the adapted Treatment Satisfaction Survey, and MBSR course effects measured by a focus group with Cohort 5, and the following assessments completed by all cohorts: Perceived Stress Scale-10, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the 36-item Short Form Survey. Results: 73 adults participated in six live MBSR courses (48 in the four in-person courses; 25 in the two online courses). Most of the participants identified as white, non-Hispanic, middle-aged females, with annual household income >$100,000. Course completion, defined as at least 6/8 classes attended, did not differ between in-person and online cohorts (84.1% versus 67.6%, respectively, p = 0.327). Participants in Cohort 5 who completed the course (n = 10) rated it as very important and useful for stress coping, and reported high likelihood of continuing their mindfulness practice (all ratings: between 8 and 10 on a 1–10 Likert scale), with open-ended responses corroborating their numerical ratings. Focus group (n = 6) responses indicated that online MBSR was positively received, reduced perceived loss of control, and improved quality of life and morale during the pandemic. Conclusions: Delivering MBSR live online can be feasible and acceptable for the general public, and is potentially beneficial, including during the social upheaval of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online delivery could help expand access to MBSR and address health inequities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/jicm.2021.0415

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riley, T. D., Roy, S., Parascando, J. A., Wile, K., LaGamma, C., Dong, H., & Zgierska, A. E.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Riley, Timothy D.
Venue
Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine
Published
2022-06-01
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
497-506
ISSN
  • 2768-3605 (ISSN-L)
  • 2768-3613
OpenAlex
W4221113472
Cited by
18
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Integrative and Complementary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, COVID-19 pandemic, feasibility, acceptability, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, quality of life, loss of control, access to mental health care, health disparities
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Pandemics, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review