Cited by 271Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsBehavioral Health and InterventionsPhysical Activity and Health

A self-determination process model of physical activity adoption in the context of a randomized controlled trial

Fortier, Michelle S., Sweet, Shane N., O’Sullivan, Tracey L., Williams, Geoffrey C.·2007·Psychology of Sport and Exercise

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.10.006

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fortier, M. S., Sweet, S. N., O’Sullivan, T. L., & Williams, G. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Fortier, Michelle S.
Venue
Psychology of Sport and Exercise
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
741-757
ISSN
1469-0292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078710886
Cited by
271
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 28
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of sport and exercise (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
self-determination theory, physical activity adoption, autonomy support, autonomous motivation, perceived competence, physical activity counseling, primary care intervention, health behavior change, process model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review