Cited by 846Diabetes Management and EducationPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions

Open access
Anderson, Robert M., Funnell, Martha M.·2010·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this article is to clarify the concept of empowerment and to correct common misconceptions about its use in diabetes care and education.Methods The patient empowerment approach is well suited to helping patients make self-selected changes related to weight, nutrition, and physical activity. Although the concept of patient empowerment has become an integral part of diabetes education, an accurate understanding and authentic application of empowerment has not occurred as readily. The empowerment approach is clarified and common misconceptions have been corrected.Results Embracing empowerment means making a paradigm shift that is often difficult because the traditional approach to care is embedded in the training and socialization of most health care professionals (HCPs).Conclusion Unlike the traditional approach, empowerment is not something one does to patients. Rather, empowerment begins when HCPs acknowledge that patient are in control of their daily diabetes care. Empowerment occurs when the HCPs goal is to increase the capacity of patients to think critically and make autonomous, informed decisions. Empowerment also occurs when patients are actually making autonomous, informed decisions about their diabetes self-management.Practice implications Clarity about all aspects of the empowerment approach is essential if it is to be used effectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.025

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Rollnick S Miller WR Butler CC Motivational Interviewing in Health Care: Helping Patients Change Behavior (Applications of Motivational Interviewing) London UK The Guilford Press 2007

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, R. M., & Funnell, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Robert M.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
277-282
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040605357
Cited by
846
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 87 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 41
FWCI
19.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r18dk062323-04)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P60DK020572, 1R18 DK062323-01, R18 DK062323)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
patient empowerment, diabetes education, diabetes self-management, patient autonomy, informed decision-making, health professions education
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Communication, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Motor Activity, Nutritional Status, Patient Education as Topic, Physician-Patient Relations, Power, Psychological, Quality of Life, Self Care, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review