CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 377Action Observation and SynchronizationNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: Neural correlates and gender differences

Open access
Derntl, Birgit, Finkelmeyer, Andreas, Eickhoff, Simon, Kellermann, Thilo, Falkenberg, Dania I., Schneider, Frank, Habel, Ute·2010·Psychoneuroendocrinology
DOI 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Empathy is a multidimensional construct and comprises the ability to perceive, understand and feel the emotional states of others. Gender differences have been reported for various aspects of emotional and cognitive behaviors including theory of mind. However, although empathy is not a single ability but a complex behavioral competency including different components, most studies relied on single aspects of empathy, such as perspective taking or emotion perception. To extend those findings we developed three paradigms to assess all three core components of empathy (emotion recognition, perspective taking and affective responsiveness) and clarify to which extent gender affects the neural correlates of empathic abilities. A functional MRI study was performed with 12 females (6 during their follicular phase, 6 during their luteal phase) and 12 males, measuring these tasks as well as self-report empathy questionnaires. Data analyses revealed no significant gender differences in behavioral performance, but females rated themselves as more empathic than males in the self-report questionnaires. Analyses of functional data revealed distinct neural networks in females and males, and females showed stronger neural activation across all three empathy tasks in emotion-related areas, including the amygdala. Exploratory analysis of possible hormonal effects indicated stronger amygdala activation in females during their follicular phase supporting previous data suggesting higher social sensitivity and thus facilitated socio-emotional behavior. Hence, our data support the assumption that females and males rely on divergent processing strategies when solving emotional tasks: while females seem to recruit more emotion and self-related regions, males activate more cortical, rather cognitive-related areas.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.006

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 92 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lehrl, 1996, Der MWT-ein Intelligenztest für die ärztliche Praxis, Praxis für Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 7, 488

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Derntl, B., Finkelmeyer, A., Eickhoff, S., Kellermann, T., Falkenberg, D. I., Schneider, F., & Habel, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
  • Jülich Aachen Research Alliance (DE)
Corresponding author
Derntl, Birgit
ORCID
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
67-82
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.006
OpenAlex
W2086539848
Cited by
377
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 34
FWCI
26.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
empathy, gender differences, emotion recognition, perspective taking, emotional responsiveness, neural correlates, amygdala, menstrual cycle, follicular phase, luteal phase, self-reported empathy, theory of mind, social sensitivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Cognition, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Menstruation, Nerve Net, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Characteristics, Recognition, Psychology, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review