Cited by 62Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStress Responses and CortisolAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

It's not what you think, it's how you relate to it: Dispositional mindfulness moderates the relationship between psychological distress and the cortisol awakening response

Open access
Daubenmier, Jennifer, Hayden, Dara, Chang, Vickie, Epel, Elissa·2014·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Objective: The cortisol awakening response (CAR) is a natural metabolic response that can be potentiated by negative cognitive-emotional processes, including stress appraisals, negative affect, and rumination. Psychological distress and the CAR are not consistently related, however. Individual differences in aspects of dispositional mindfulness which reflect how people relate to negative thoughts and emotions may help explain such inconsistencies. We tested whether the tendency to (1) label and describe inner experiences and (2) accept negative thoughts and feelings without judgment moderated the association between psychological distress and the CAR. Methods: Self-reported dispositional mindfulness, perceived stress, anxiety, negative affect, rumination, and the CAR were assessed among overweight/obese women. Regression analyses were conducted to examine whether dispositional mindfulness moderated the relationship between indicators of psychological distress and the CAR. Results: While psychological distress was consistently positively related to the CAR, these associations were qualified by significant interactions with both components of dispositional mindfulness. Psychological distress was associated with the CAR at lower levels of dispositional mindfulness but not at higher levels. Conclusion: These findings are consistent with the idea that the tendency to describe and accept experiences may buffer the impact of psychological distress on physiological arousal. These metacognitive processes may be important moderators in unraveling the complex relationship between psychological distress and physiological stress reactivity. Further research is recommended to replicate this approach in other populations. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.05.012

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 9 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    A mindfulness intervention lowered the cortisol awakening response relative to a waitlist control in a subgroup of obese women.

    “Additionally, a mindfulness intervention reduced the CAR compared to a waitlist control condition in a subgroup of obese women (Daubenmier et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Daubenmier et al., 2011 source
  • Premisecitation

    Dispositional mindfulness is linked to reduced HPA reactivity to a standardized laboratory stressor.

    “and reduced HPA reactivity to a standardized laboratory stressor (Brown, Weinstein, & Creswell, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brown, Weinstein, & Creswell, 2012 source
  • Findingown data

    Anxiety, negative affect, and rumination were positively related to the cortisol awakening response at lower dispositional mindfulness levels but not at higher levels.

    “Anxiety, negative affect, and rumination were positively related to the CAR at lower levels of dispositional mindfulness but not at higher levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The cortisol awakening response was negatively related to the Describe component of dispositional mindfulness (r = -.39, p = .009).

    “As predicted, the CAR was negatively related to Describe (r = -.39, p = .009)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The cortisol awakening response was negatively related to the Accept component of dispositional mindfulness (r = -.37, p = .01).

    “and Accept (r = -.37, p = .01).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • May combine two claims. 16
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Neuroticism predicts depressive symptoms six years later among people with a weaker tendency to label experiences, but not among those with a stronger tendency.

    “For example, neuroticism predicts depressive symptoms six years later among individuals with lesser tendency to label experiences but not among those with greater tendency, suggesting that the ability to describe inner experiences may protect against long-term negative effects of neuroticism (Barnhofer et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Barnhofer et al., 2011 source

      The Results report that neuroticism was significantly associated with later depressive symptoms below a threshold on the Describing scale, but not above it. However, the Results say the Describing interaction only approached significance after adjustment, and the Discussion cautions that the facet findings require great caution. The claim presents this tentative facet-specific result too firmly. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A significant Accept × negative affect interaction showed that a 1-SD increase in negative affect was linked to a 4.15 nmol/L increase in the cortisol awakening response when Accept was low (p = .003), but no significant link when Accept was high (p = .92).

    “For example, a significant interaction between Accept and negative affect was observed such that a 1-SD increase in negative affect was associated with a 4.15 nmol/L increase in the CAR when Accept was low (p = .003), but no significant association with the CAR was observed when Accept was high (p = .92).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the eight interaction models, four were statistically significant, two were marginally significant, and two were non-significant.

    “Of the eight interaction models, four were statistically significant, two were of marginal significance, and two were non-significant (see Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the four Accept models, interactions with negative affect and anxiety were statistically significant, while those with perceived stress and rumination were marginally significant (ps = .08 and .09).

    “Specifically, in regards to the four models including Accept, the two interactions including negative affect and anxiety were statistically significant and those including perceived stress and rumination were of marginal significance (ps = .08 and .09, respectively).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The links between psychological distress and the cortisol awakening response were qualified by interactions with dispositional mindfulness components, which explained significant variance in the CAR (13-27%) beyond distress indicators alone.

    “However, these associations were qualified by interactions with components of dispositional mindfulness, which explained significant proportions of variance in the CAR (13-27%) beyond indicators of psychological distress alone.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The models testing Describe interactions with rumination and anxiety were significant and showed a pattern similar to the Accept models.

    “The models testing the interaction of Describe with rumination and anxiety were significant, showing a similar pattern to those including Accept (see Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The link between psychological distress and the cortisol awakening response was positive at lower Accept levels (1 SD below the mean) but not at higher levels (1 SD above the mean).

    “The pattern of interaction was similar across models such that the association between psychological distress and the CAR was positively related at lower levels of Accept (1 SD below the mean) but not at higher levels (1 SD above the mean; see Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Psychological distress was positively associated with the cortisol awakening response, as found in prior studies.

    “As expected, psychological distress was positively associated with the CAR as found in prior studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The potential buffering effect of mindfulness on the cortisol awakening response did not clearly generalize to stress appraisals, although the acceptance interaction was marginally significant.

    “The potential buffering effect of mindfulnes on the CAR did not clearly generalize to stress appraisals, although the interaction with acceptance was marginally sigificant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All measures were collected at baseline before randomization.

    “All measures were collected at baseline prior to randomization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants reported taking the second morning sample within five minutes of the 30-minute target in 138 of 145 samples, or 95% of cases across the four collection days.

    “In 95% of cases across the four days of saliva collection (138 out of 145 samples), participants reported taking the second morning sample within ± 5 minutes of the 30 minute guideline.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Variables were centered to prevent multicollinearity in the models.

    “Variables were centered to avoid multi-collinearity in the models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Greater cortisol awakening responses are linked to higher appraisals of general life and job stress.

    “According to a meta-analysis, higher CARs are associated with increased appraisals of general life and job stress (Chida & Steptoe, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chida & Steptoe, 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The cortisol assay's intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were under 9%.

    “Intra and inter-assay coefficients of variation were below 9%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Anxiety, rumination, and negative affect do not show a reliable link to the cortisol awakening response.

    “However, negative affect, anxiety, and rumination are not reliably associated with the CAR (Chida & Steptoe, 2009; Zoccola &Dickerson, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chida & Steptoe, 2009 source
    • cites Zoccola &Dickerson, 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The morning cortisol rise after waking is steeper than the early-morning circadian cortisol increase, which indicates it captures processes specific to awakening.

    “The CAR has a slope steeper than the circadian rise of cortisol concentrations in the early morning hours suggesting that the CAR reflects psychophysiological processes unique to awakening (Wilhelm et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wilhelm et al., 2007 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    These results are cross-sectional, so the causal direction among variables and whether genetic predispositions or environmental exposures account for the relations cannot be determined.

    “Finally, these results are cross-sectional and we cannot be sure of the causal direction of the relation among variables or whether genetic predispositions or environmental exposures account for the relations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Mindful awareness of internal experiences may more likely reduce HPA reactivity when situations are ambiguous, trait negative affect or rumination is high, or during recovery from stressors.

    “Mindful awareness of internal experiences may more likely reduce HPA reactivity when situations are ambiguous, trait levels of negative affect or rumination are high, or during recovery from stressors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The cortisol awakening response is a valid indicator of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Further consideration of dispositional mindfulness components as moderating variables may show for whom and in what circumstances negative psychological factors affect the cortisol awakening response and other stress reactivity measures.

    “Further consideration of components of dispositional mindfulness as moderating variables may show for whom and in what circumstances negative psychological factors affect the CAR and other stress reactivity measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The cortisol awakening response is a valid indicator of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Strong identification with or judgment of negative thoughts and emotions may increase or prolong HPA axis activation, but not if those thoughts and emotions are experienced with mindful awareness.

    “Put another way, strong identification with or judgment of negative thoughts and emotions may increase or prolong HPA axis activation but not if those thoughts and emotions are experienced with mindful awareness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The cortisol awakening response is a valid indicator of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Labeling and accepting internal experiences may do less to buffer the impact of negative thoughts and feelings on physiological responses when objective stressors are present, because HPA reactivity to objective stressors may be adaptive.

    “Accordingly, labeling and accepting internal experiences may do less to buffer the impact of negative thoughts and feelings on physiological responses in the presence of objective stressors, as HPA reactivity to objective stressors may be adaptive.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The cortisol awakening response is a valid indicator of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This is the first study to report that dispositional mindfulness aspects-the tendency to describe and accept thoughts and emotions-are negatively related to the cortisol awakening response.

    “To our knowledge, this is the first study to report that aspects of dispositional mindfulness – the tendency to describe and accept thoughts and emotions – are negatively related to the CAR.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These findings were observed in non-meditators, suggesting that natural variations in trait mindfulness may protect physical health.

    “Of note, these findings were observed in non-meditators, suggesting natural variations in trait aspects of mindfulness may be protective of physical health.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The cortisol awakening response is a valid indicator of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Stress appraisals may more closely reflect the presence of objective stressors.

    “Stress appraisals may more closely reflect the presence of objective stressors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If individuals can label distressing internal experiences or not judge themselves for having them, the impact of those experiences on HPA stress arousal may be attenuated.

    “If individuals are able to label distressing internal experiences or not judge themselves for having them (presumably decreasing identification with them) the impact of those experiences on HPA stress arousal may be attenuated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The cortisol awakening response is a valid indicator of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation.
25 of 25
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cortisol awakening response is a valid indicator of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation.

    “The cortisol awakening response (CAR) is a naturalistic indicator of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Core identity and personality representations, as well as anticipation of daily events, become conscious upon awakening and trigger HPA activation.

    “Core identity and personality representations as well as anticipation of daily events are thought to become conscious upon awakening triggering HPA activation.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • CAR calculation reverses the stated direction of the response

    Major

    The paper defines the CAR as an increase after awakening, but its stated calculation subtracts the 30-minute value from the waking value. That calculation gives a negative value when cortisol rises, reversing the direction used to interpret the reported associations.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daubenmier, J., Hayden, D., Chang, V., & Epel, E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Wright Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Daubenmier, Jennifer
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
48
Pages
11-18
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100641427
Cited by
62
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024131, ULI-RR024131)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K01AT004199)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
trait mindfulness, cortisol awakening response, psychological distress, perceived stress, anxiety, negative affect, rumination, metacognition, physiological stress reactivity, overweight and obesity, women, moderation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Arousal, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Perception, Personality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saliva, Stress, Psychological, Thinking, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review