Cited by 71Stress Responses and CortisolAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Depression and anxiety predict sex-specific cortisol responses to interpersonal stress

Powers, Sally I., Laurent, Heidemarie K., Gunlicks-Stoessel, Meredith, Balaban, Susan, Bent, Eileen·2016·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Clinical theories posit interpersonal stress as an important factor in the emergence and exacerbation of depression and anxiety, while neuroendocrine research confirms the association of these syndromes with dysregulation in a major stress response system, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. However, the proposal that depression and anxiety symptoms and diagnoses are associated with problematic HPA responses to close relationship stress has not been directly tested. We examined 196 heterosexual dating couples' depression and anxiety symptoms and diagnoses, assessed with questionnaires and diagnostic interviews, in relation to cortisol responses to discussion of an unresolved relationship conflict. Participants provided seven salivary samples in anticipation of and directly following the discussion, and throughout an hour-long recovery period, which were assayed for cortisol. Multilevel models of the HPA response predicted by symptoms or diagnoses showed that women's depressive symptoms predicted attenuated cortisol levels, with a flatter response curve. In contrast, men's depression symptoms and women's anxiety symptoms and diagnoses predicted higher cortisol levels. These findings highlight the importance of examining sex differences in responses to interpersonal stressors for understanding HPA dysregulation in internalizing psychopathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.04.007

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Powers, S. I., Laurent, H. K., Gunlicks-Stoessel, M., Balaban, S., & Bent, E.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Powers, Sally I.
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
69
Pages
172-179
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2337939374
Cited by
71
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
depression, anxiety, cortisol, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, interpersonal stress, relationship conflict, sex differences, salivary cortisol, internalizing psychopathology, couples, stress response
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Circadian Rhythm, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Surveys and Questionnaires, Saliva, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review