Cited by 180Child Abuse and TraumaStress Responses and CortisolChild Welfare and Adoption

Maltreatment and diurnal cortisol regulation: a meta-analysis

Bernard, Kristin, Frost, Allison, Bennett, Charles B., Lindhiem, Oliver·2017·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Childhood maltreatment leads to a host of negative physical and mental health outcomes, with cortisol dysregulation implicated as a possible mechanism. Given inconsistencies across in the literature regarding the direction and magnitude of the association between maltreatment and diurnal cortisol regulation, the current meta-analysis of 27 studies aimed to examine the association between maltreatment and at least one of 3 indicators of diurnal cortisol regulation: wake-up cortisol levels, the cortisol awakening response (CAR), and/or the diurnal cortisol slope. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedges' g formula and were pooled using a random effects model. For the association between maltreatment and wake-up cortisol level, the aggregate effect size was g=0.08, p=0.26. Notably, effect sizes between maltreatment and wake-up cortisol were significantly larger (Q between=5.18, p=0.02) for studies of agency-referred samples, g=0.24, p=0.006, than studies for which maltreatment status was based on self-report, g=0.00, p=0.97, with maltreatment associated with reduced wake-up cortisol levels. For the association between maltreatment and the CAR and diurnal cortisol slope, the aggregate effect sizes were non-significant and none of the moderator variables were significant. Although results did not indicate a large and robust association between maltreatment and various indicators of diurnal cortisol, studies with more rigorous designs (i.e., agency-referred samples) showed a small, significant association between maltreatment and blunted wake-up cortisol levels, suggesting a pattern of hypocortisolism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.01.005

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernard, K., Frost, A., Bennett, C. B., & Lindhiem, O.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Bernard, Kristin
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
78
Pages
57-67
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2567839240
Cited by
180
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
child abuse, cortisol awakening response, diurnal cortisol slope, adrenal insufficiency, HPA axis dysregulation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Middle Aged, Saliva, Stress, Psychological, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review