Cited by 124Extraction and Separation ProcessesRecycling and Waste Management TechniquesEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

Simulation-based Life Cycle Assessment for hydrometallurgical recycling of mixed Lib and nimh waste

Open access
Rinne, Marja, Elomaa, Heini, Porvali, Antti, Lundström, Mari·2021·Resources Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

The sustainable and competitive recovery of materials from spent batteries is becoming an urgent issue due to the increasing popularity of hybrid and fully electric vehicles. In this present study, flowsheet simulation was combined with life cycle assessment to investigate the environmental impacts of a conceptual, experimentally proven hydrometallurgical battery recycling process, where nickel metal hydride (NiMH) battery waste is used as reductant for lithium-ion battery (LIB) waste, synergistically improving the extraction of valuable metals from both waste types. Various options for sodium circulation in the precipitation of rare earths were considered in different scenarios. The results showed that the main benefit of the process was the reduced consumption of leaching chemicals. Of the investigated sodium management scenarios, crystallization of sodium sulfate was found to be the most environmentally feasible option, allowing the use of Na as a precipitation chemical for rare earth recovery. Significant potential reductions in climate change, acidification, freshwater eutrophication, and human toxicity were also achievable when compared to the life cycle impacts of the primary production of battery metals, mainly due to the high environmental footprint of primary nickel and cobalt sulfate production. Although further improvements to the process were found to be possible, the future availability of waste NiMH batteries may limit the application of the described process concept on an industrial scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105586

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rinne, M., Elomaa, H., Porvali, A., & Lundström, M.
Affiliations
Aalto University (FI)
Corresponding author
Rinne, Marja
Venue
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
170
Pages
105586
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3143555413
Cited by
124
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 5
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Suomen Akatemia
  • Aalto-Yliopisto
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
lithium-ion battery waste, flowsheet simulation, life cycle assessment, rare earth recovery, sodium sulfate precipitation, nickel recovery, cobalt recovery, electric vehicle batteries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review