Cited by 90Schizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditionsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

The arcuate fasciculus in auditory-verbal hallucinations: A meta-analysis of diffusion-tensor-imaging studies

Open access
Geoffroy, Pierre A., Houenou, Josselin, Duhamel, Alain, Amad, Ali, De Weijer, Antoin D., Ćurčić-Blake, Branislava, Linden, David E.J., Thomas, Pierre +1 more·2014·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Auditory-verbal hallucinations (AVHs) are associated with an impaired connectivity of large-scale networks. To examine the relationship between white-matter integrity and AVHs, we conducted a meta-analysis of diffusion-tensor-imaging studies that compared patients with schizophrenia and AVHs with matched healthy controls (HCs). Five studies were retained gathering 256 DTI data points, divided into AVHs (n=106) and HCs (n=150). The meta-analysis demonstrated a reduced fractional anisotropy in the left Arcuate Fasciculus (AF) of hallucinators (hg= -0.42; CI[-0.69,-0.16]; p<10(-3)). The current meta-analysis confirmed disruptions of white matter integrity in the left AF bundle of schizophrenia patients with AVHs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2014.07.014

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geoffroy, P. A., Houenou, J., Duhamel, A., Amad, A., De Weijer, A. D., Ćurčić-Blake, B., Linden, D. E. J., Thomas, P., & Jardri, R.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
  • Université de Lille (FR)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Jardri, Renaud
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
159
Issue
1
Pages
234-237
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100037361
Cited by
90
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • GDR-CNRS 3557 'Institut de Recherche en Psychiatrie
  • BCB (UMCG grant (No.689901), ERC grant (ERC StG 2012-312787_DRASTIC))
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
auditory verbal hallucinations, arcuate fasciculus
MeSH terms
Hallucinations, Humans, Anisotropy, Subthalamus, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review