Cited by 490Microplastics and Plastic PollutionPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

Sinks and sources: assessing microplastic abundance in river sediment and deposit feeders in an austral temperate urban river system

Nel, Holly A., Dalu, Tatenda, Wasserman, Ryan J.·2018·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Microplastics are important novel pollutants in freshwaters but their behaviour in river sediments is poorly understood due to the large amounts of coloured dissolved organic matter that impede sample processing. The present study aimed to 1.) estimate the microplastic pollution dynamics in an urban river system experiencing temporal differences in river flow, and 2.) investigate the potential use of chironomids as indicators of microplastic pollution levels in degraded freshwater environments. Microplastic levels were estimated from sediment and Chironomus spp. larvae collected from various sites along the Bloukrans River system, in the Eastern Cape South Africa during the summer and winter season. River flow, water depth, channel width, substrate embeddedness and sediment organic matter were simultaneously collected from each site. The winter season was characterised by elevated microplastic abundances, likely as a result of lower energy and increased sediment deposition associated with reduced river flow. In addition, results showed that particle distribution may be governed by various other external factors, such as substrate type and sediment organic matter. The study further highlighted that deposit feeders associated with the benthic river habitats, namely Chironomus spp. ingest microplastics and that the seasonal differences in sediment microplastic dynamics were reflected in chironomid microplastic abundance. There was a positive, though weakly significant relationship between deposit feeders and sediment suggesting that deposit feeders such as Chironomus spp. larvae could serve as an important indicator of microplastic loads within freshwater ecosystems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.298

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nel, H. A., Dalu, T., & Wasserman, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Rhodes University (ZA)
  • Monash University Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Nel, Holly A.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
612
Pages
950-956
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2752665592
Cited by
490
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 7
FWCI
16.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of South Africa (88414, 88746)
  • Rhodes University Grant
  • Claude Leon Postdoctoral Research Fellowship
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Keywords
microplastics, river sediments, deposit feeders, Chironomus larvae, bioindicators, urban rivers, seasonal variation, river discharge, sediment organic matter, substrate type, freshwater pollution
MeSH terms
Animals, Chironomidae, Cities, Environmental Monitoring, Plastics, South Africa, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Geologic Sediments, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review