Cited by 1,764Microplastics and Plastic PollutionPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsUrban Stormwater Management Solutions

Microplastic contamination in an urban area: a case study in Greater Paris

Open access
Dris, Rachid, Gasperi, Johnny, Rocher, Vincent, Saad, Mohamed, Renault, Nicolas, Tassin, Bruno·2015·Environmental Chemistry

Abstract

Environmental context: Plastics production has increased considerably in recent years, leading to pollution by plastics, including microplastics (comprising particles smaller than 5 mm). This work addresses the issue of microplastics from urban sources and in receiving waters in Greater Paris. Microplastics were found in all urban compartments investigated, namely atmospheric fallout, waste- and treated water, and surface water. This study investigates the microplastic contamination of both urban compartments (wastewater and total atmospheric fallout) and surface water in a continental environment. These first investigations on an urban environment confirm the presence of microplastics in sewage, fresh water and total atmospheric fallout and provide knowledge on the type and size distribution of microplastics in the 100–5000-µm range. For the first time, the presence of microplastics, mostly fibres, is highlighted in total atmospheric fallout (29–280 particles m–2 day–1). High levels of fibres were found in wastewater (260–320 × 103 particles m–3). In treated effluent, the contamination significantly decreased to 14–50 × 103 particles m–3. In the River Seine, two sampling devices were used to collect both large and small microplastic particles: (i) a plankton net (80-µm mesh), and (ii) a manta trawl (330-µm mesh). Sampling with the plankton net showed a predominance of fibres, with concentrations ranging from 3 to 108 particles m–3. A greater diversity of both microplastic shapes and types was found during manta trawl sampling but at much lower concentrations (0.28–0.47 particles m–3). This combined approach could be relevant and implemented in future studies to provide an accurate overview of microplastic distribution in freshwater.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/en14167

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dris, R., Gasperi, J., Rocher, V., Saad, M., Renault, N., & Tassin, B.
Affiliations
  • AgroParisTech (FR)
  • AUniversité Paris-Est, Laboratoire Eau, Environnement, Systèmes Urbains (LEESU), UMR MA 102 – AgroParisTech, 61 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, F-94010 Créteil Cedex, France.
  • Syndicat Interdépartemental pour l'Assainissement de l'Agglomération Parisienne (FR)
Corresponding author
Dris, Rachid
Venue
Environmental Chemistry
Published
2015-07-21
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
592-599
ISSN
  • 1448-2517 (ISSN-L)
  • 1449-8979
OpenAlex
W1810360004
Cited by
1,764
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 148 · 2025: 239 · 2024: 259 · 2023: 240 · 2022: 258 · 2021: 223 · 2020: 196 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 3
FWCI
24.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Keywords
microplastics, urban pollution, atmospheric fallout, wastewater, treated effluent, surface water, microplastic fibers, microplastic size distribution, freshwater pollution, Paris metropolitan area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review