Cited by 117Sleep and related disordersPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Changes in dysfunctional beliefs about sleep after cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Open access
Thakral, Manu, Von Korff, Michael, McCurry, Susan M., Morin, Charles M., Vitiello, Michael V.·2020·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the preferred treatment for chronic insomnia and sleep-related cognitions are one target of treatment. There has been little systematic investigation of how sleep-related cognitions are being assessed in CBT-I trials and no meta-analysis of the impact of CBT-I on dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, a core cognitive component of treatment. Academic Search Complete, Medline, CINAHL and PsychInfo from 1990 to 2018 were searched to identify randomized controlled trials of CBT-I in adults (≥18 years) reporting some measure of sleep-related cognitions. Sixteen randomized controlled trials were identified comparing 1134 CBT-I and 830 control subjects. The Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale was utilized almost exclusively to assess sleep-related cognitions in these trials. Hedge's g at 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to assess CBT-I effect size at post-treatment compared to controls. CBT-I significantly reduced dysfunctional beliefs about sleep (g = -0.90, 95% CI -1.19, -0.62) at post-treatment. Three trials contributed data to estimate effect size for long-term effects (g = -1.04, 95% CI -2.07, -0.02) with follow up time ranging from 3 to 18 mo. We concluded that cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia has moderate to large effects on dysfunctional beliefs about sleep.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.101230

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep improve after a period of CBT-I in adults, with a large effect.

    “a meta-analysis by Thakral et al. (2020) found dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep improve after a period of CBT-I in adults, with a large effect reported.”

    From Do non-pharmacological sleep interventions affect anxiety symptoms? A meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Thakral et al., 2020

  • A similar meta-analysis investigating the effects of CBT-I on dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep found a large effect.

    “This reflects a similar meta-analysis investigating the effects of CBT-I on dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep, where a large effect was found (Thakral et al., 2020).”

    From Do non-pharmacological sleep interventions affect anxiety symptoms? A meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Thakral et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Morin CM. Insomnia: Psychological assessment and management [ Internet]. New York:NY: Guilford Press New York; 1993 [ cited 2019 Mar 14]. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1993-98362-000
  2. [25]Lacks P Behavioral treatment for persistent insomnia. New York: Pergamon Press; 1987.
  3. [55]Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub; 2013. 24413388
  4. [59]Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The Fatigue Severity Scale. Arch Neurol. 1989; 46: 1121– 3. 2803071

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thakral, M., Von Korff, M., McCurry, S. M., Morin, C. M., & Vitiello, M. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Thakral, Manu
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
49
Pages
101230
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2985404547
Cited by
117
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, sleep-related cognitions, chronic insomnia, treatment effect size, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review