Cited by 185Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and FertilizationInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology

Contrasted effect of biochar and earthworms on rice growth and resource allocation in different soils

Open access
Noguera, Diana, Rondón, Marco, Laossi, Kam-Rigne, Hoyos, Valerio, Lavelle, Patrick, Cruz de Carvalho, Maria Helena, Barot, Sébastien·2010·Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Adding biochar to soils and maintaining high earthworm biomasses are potential ways to increase the fertility of tropical soils and the sustainability of crop production in the spirit of agroecology and ecological engineering. However, a thorough functional assessment of biochar effect on plant growth and resource allocations is so far missing. Moreover, earthworms and biochar increase mineral nutrient availability through an increase in mineralization and nutrient retention respectively and are likely to interact through various other mechanisms. They could thus increase plant growth synergistically. This hypothesis was tested for rice in a greenhouse experiment. Besides, the relative effects of biochar and earthworms were compared in three different soil treatments (a nutrient rich soil, a nutrient poor soil, a nutrient poor soil supplemented with fertilization). Biochar and earthworm effects on rice growth and resource allocation highly depended on soil type and were generally additive (no synergy). In the rich soil, there were both clear positive biochar and earthworm effects, while there were generally only positive earthworm effects in the poor soil, and neither earthworm nor biochar effect in the poor soil with fertilization. The analysis of earthworm and biochar effects on different plant traits and soil mineral nitrogen content, confirmed that they act through an increase in nutrient availability. However it also suggested that another mechanism, such as the release in the soil of molecules recognized as phytohormones by plants, is also involved in earthworm action. This mechanism could for example help explaining how earthworms increase rice resource allocation to roots and influence the allocation to grains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.03.001

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No interaction with respect to mineral N was found between earthworms and biochar.

    “and no interaction with respect to mineral N”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [83]

    Table 1 reports significant earthworm–biochar interactions for mineral-N measures: ammonium in all three soils and nitrate in the poor soil. Section 3.1 also describes non-additive effects, contrary to the claim that no interaction was found. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Differences in mineral N were observed with treatments but were soil type dependent.

    “while differences in mineral N were observed with treatments these were soil type dependant”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [83]

  • Few interactions between earthworms and biochar were found.

    “they found few interactions between earthworms and biochar”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [83]

  • The lack of interaction between earthworms and biochar with respect to mineral N may be due to the short term nature of the mesocosm study.

    “possibly as a result of the short term nature of the mesocosm study.”

    From A Review of Biochar and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics (2013) · cites this paper as [83]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Brown, G.G., Edwards, C.A., Brussaard, L., 2004a. How earthworms effect plant growth: burrowing into the mechanisms. In: Edwards, C.A. (Ed.), Earthworm Ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 13e49.
  2. Lambers, H., Stuart Chapin, F., Pons, T., 1988a. Mineral nutrition. In: Plant physio- logical ecology. Springer, New York, pp. 255e310.
  3. Lambers, H., Stuart Chapin, F., Pons, T., 1988c. Growth and alocation. Springer, New York, pp. 321e67.
  4. Tapia-Coral, S.C., Luizao, F.J., Barros, E., Pashanasi, B., Del Castillo, D., 2006. Effect of Pontoscolex corethrurus Muller, 1857 (Oligochaeta: Glossoscolecidae) inoculation on litter weight loss and soil nitrogen in mesocosms in the Peruvian Amazon. Caribbean Journal of Science 42, 410e418.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noguera, D., Rondón, M., Laossi, K.-R., Hoyos, V., Lavelle, P., Cruz de Carvalho, M. H., & Barot, S.
Affiliations
  • Institut d'écologie et des sciences de l'environnement de Paris (FR)
  • International Development Research Centre (CA)
  • Etude et Compréhension de la biodiversité (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Noguera, Diana
Venue
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
1017-1027
ISSN
0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001143279
Cited by
185
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 14
FWCI
20.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Keywords
biochar, earthworms, rice, plant growth, resource allocation, soil nutrient availability, soil fertility, low-fertility soils, fertilization, soil nitrogen, plant hormones, tropical soils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review