Cited by 484Science Education and PedagogyEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEvaluation of Teaching Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 117 references

16 of the 117 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Decker, A.-T., Hardy, I., Hertel, S., Luhken, A. & Kunter, M. (in press). Die Entwicklung von fachdidaktischem Wissen und Uberzeugungen von Grundschullehrkraften im Kontext von Lehrerfortbildungen zum "Schwimmen und Sinken" [The development of primary school teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and beliefs in the context of professional development workshops on "floating and sinking". Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht.
  2. Kleickmann, 2010, Zusammenhänge zwischen Lehrervorstellungen und kognitivem Strukturieren im Unterricht [Relations between teacher conceptions and features of scaffolding], Unterrichtswissenschaft, 38, 210
  3. Mansour, 2009, Science teachers' beliefs and practices: Issues, implications and research agenda, International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4, 25
  4. Warwas, 2011, Bedingungsfaktoren des Einsatzes von adaptiven Unterrichtsformen im Grundschulunterricht [Conditions for the application of adaptive teaching in elementary school], Zeitschrift für Padagogik, 57, 854

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 449

Metadata

Authors
Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A.-T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M.
Affiliations
  • Individual Development and Adaptive Education (DE)
  • University of Wuppertal (DE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Fauth, Benjamin
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
86
Pages
102882
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2970287884
Cited by
484
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 83 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 2
FWCI
107.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • peDOCS
Funders
LOEWE
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Keywords
teacher competence, teaching quality, elementary school science, academic performance, student interest, pedagogical content knowledge, teacher self-efficacy, teaching enthusiasm, cognitive activation, supportive classroom climate, classroom management, teacher-student relationship, conceptual understanding, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review