Cited by 189Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural Correlates of Unconsciousness in Large-Scale Brain Networks

Open access
Mashour, George A., Hudetz, Anthony G.·2018·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

The biological basis of consciousness is one of the most challenging and fundamental questions in 21st century science. A related pursuit aims to identify the neural correlates and causes of unconsciousness. We review current trends in the investigation of physiological, pharmacological, and pathological states of unconsciousness at the level of large-scale functional brain networks. We focus on the roles of brain connectivity, repertoire, graph-theoretical techniques, and neural dynamics in understanding the functional brain disconnections and reduced complexity that appear to characterize these states. Persistent questions in the field, such as distinguishing true correlates, linking neural scales, and understanding differential recovery patterns, are also addressed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2018.01.003

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 97 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Thul, 2016, EEG entropy measures indicate decrease of cortical information processing in disorders of consciousness, Clin. Neurophysiol., 127, 1419, 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.07.039 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mashour, G. A., & Hudetz, A. G.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Mashour, George A.
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
150-160
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2786504149
Cited by
189
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (R01GM098578, R01GM111293, R01124248, R01GM056398)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
loss of consciousness, neural correlates of consciousness, large-scale brain networks, brain connectivity, graph theory, neural dynamics, consciousness
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Consciousness, Electroencephalography, Humans, Neural Pathways, Unconsciousness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review