Cited by 111Physical Activity and HealthCardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Are lower levels of cardiorespiratory fitness associated with incident depression? A systematic review of prospective cohort studies

Schuch, Felipe B., Vancampfort, Davy, Sui, Xuemei, Rosenbaum, Simon, Firth, Joseph, Richards, Justin, Ward, Philip B., Stubbs, Brendon·2016·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) is protective from future depression, however, the potential impact of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) on the development of depression is less clear. We aimed to investigate if lower levels of CRF are associated with a higher risk for depression onset. Major electronic databases were searched, from inception to January 2016 for prospective cohort studies evaluating the association between CRF and incident depression. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Three prospective studies were identified and data from two studies were pooled. Our data provide preliminary evidence found that people with low CRF and medium CRF were at increased risk of developing depression (n=1,128,290, HR=1.76, 95% CI 1.61-1.91, p<0.001, I 2=11.88, and HR=1.23, 95% CI 1.20-1.38, p<0.001, I 2=0, respectively). Considered alongside the wider benefits of higher levels of CRF, these findings further support the rationale for interventions specifically targeting fitness, in order to reduce the significant burden associated with depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.011

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schuch, F. B., Vancampfort, D., Sui, X., Rosenbaum, S., Firth, J., Richards, J., Ward, P. B., & Stubbs, B.
Affiliations
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Black Dog Institute (AU)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Schuch, Felipe B.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
93
Pages
159-165
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2536337695
Cited by
111
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
cardiorespiratory fitness, depression, incident depression, physical activity, depression risk
MeSH terms
Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Depression, Humans, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review