Cited by 348Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

The role of hyperinsulinemia in the pathogenesis of ovarian hyperandrogenism

Open access
Wallach, Edward E., Barbieri, Robert L., Smith, Samuel, Ryan, Kenneth J.·1988·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

The evidence that supports the hypothesis that insulin and LH both regulate ovarian androgen production was presented. The most dramatic clinical example of the association between hyperinsulinemia and hyperandrogenism is the HAIR-AN syndrome. Our hypothesis is that, in the HAIR-AN syndrome, the severe insulin resistance causes a compensatory hyperinsulinemia, which stimulates ovarian androgen production if adequate LH is present. The acanthosis nigricans is an epiphenomenon of the syndrome. Acanthosis nigricans is a dermatologic manifestation of severe insulin resistance. In vitro evidence suggests that insulin and IGF-I stimulate androgen production in incubations of human stroma and theca. The stromatropic effects of insulin may sensitize the stroma to the stimulatory effects of LH. In some hyperandrogenic-insulin-resistant women, a glucose load appears to produce an acute rise in circulating androgens. The magnitude of the rise in circulating androgens is proportional to the magnitude of the insulin response to the glucose load. These data suggest that hyperinsulinemia may play a central role in the development of ovarian hyperandrogenism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60060-2

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 108 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallach, E. E., Barbieri, R. L., Smith, S., & Ryan, K. J.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-08
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
197-212
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W194639418
Cited by
348
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
hyperinsulinemia, ovarian hyperandrogenism, polycystic ovary syndrome, androgen overproduction, PCOS pathogenesis, insulin resistance, hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, adrenal androgen production
MeSH terms
Acanthosis Nigricans, Androgens, Female, Humans, Hyperinsulinism, Insulin Resistance, Ovary, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review