Cited by 137Primate Behavior and EcologyMorphological variations and asymmetryEvolution and Paleontology Studies

The evolution of the cortico-cerebellar complex in primates: anatomical connections predict patterns of correlated evolution

Whiting, B.A, Barton, R.A·2003·Journal of Human Evolution

Abstract

Investigations into the evolution of the primate brain have tended to neglect the role of connectivity in determining which brain structures have changed in size, focusing instead on changes in the size of the whole brain or of individual brain structures, such as the neocortex, in isolation. We show that the primate cerebellum, neocortex, vestibular nuclei and relays between them exhibit correlated volumetric evolution, even after removing the effects of change in other structures. The patterns of correlated evolution among individual nuclei correspond to their known patterns of connectivity. These results support the idea that the brain evolved by mosaic size change in arrays of functionally connected structures. Furthermore, they suggest that the much discussed expansion of the primate neocortex should be re-evaluated in the light of conjoint cerebellar expansion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0047-2484(02)00162-8

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a striking correspondence between the patterns of correlated evolution among specific components of the cortico-cerebellar system and their anatomical connectivity, down to the level of individual nuclei.

    “Second, there is a striking correspondence between the patterns of correlated evolution among specific components of the cortico-cerebellar system and their anatomical connectivity, down to the level of individual nuclei [62,67].”

    From Embodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum (2012) · cites this paper as [67]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whiting, B. A., & Barton, R. A.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Whiting, B.A
Venue
Journal of Human Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
3-10
ISSN
0047-2484 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999446466
Cited by
137
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Human Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
primate brain evolution, cerebellum, neocortex, vestibular nuclei, brain connectivity, brain size
MeSH terms
Anatomy, Comparative, Animals, Anthropometry, Cerebellar Cortex, Biological Evolution, Pons, Primates, Thalamus, Vestibular Nuclei, Neocortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review