Cited by 291Primate Behavior and EcologyLanguage and cultural evolutionEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Rapid evolution of the cerebellum in humans and other great apes

Open access
Barton, Robert A., Venditti, Chris·2014·Current Biology

Abstract

Humans' unique cognitive abilities are usually attributed to a greatly expanded neocortex, which has been described as "the crowning achievement of evolution and the biological substrate of human mental prowess". The human cerebellum, however, contains four times more neurons than the neocortex and is attracting increasing attention for its wide range of cognitive functions. Using a method for detecting evolutionary rate changes along the branches of phylogenetic trees, we show that the cerebellum underwent rapid size increase throughout the evolution of apes, including humans, expanding significantly faster than predicted by the change in neocortex size. As a result, humans and other apes deviated significantly from the general evolutionary trend for neocortex and cerebellum to change in tandem, having significantly larger cerebella relative to neocortex size than other anthropoid primates. These results suggest that cerebellar specialization was a far more important component of human brain evolution than hitherto recognized and that technical intelligence was likely to have been at least as important as social intelligence in human cognitive evolution. Given the role of the cerebellum in sensory-motor control and in learning complex action sequences, cerebellar specialization is likely to have underpinned the evolution of humans' advanced technological capacities, which in turn may have been a preadaptation for language.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.056

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both the basal ganglia and the cerebellum receive direct input from the motor cortex and are involved in the preparation, learning, and sensorimotor coordination of movements.

    “because both brain structures receive direct input from the motor cortex and are involved in the preparation, learning, and sensorimotor coordination of movements.”

    From Neandertal Introgression Sheds Light on Modern Human Endocranial Globularity (2019) · cites this paper as [9]

    The paper’s summary (p. 3) describes the cerebellum’s role in sensory-motor control and learning complex action sequences. It does not establish that both the cerebellum and basal ganglia receive direct motor-cortex input or share all the stated movement-related roles. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barton, R. A., & Venditti, C.
Affiliations
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Barton, Robert A.
  • Venditti, Chris
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
24
Issue
20
Pages
2440-2444
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079383201
Cited by
291
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
27.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2017-04-24)
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Leverhulme Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
cerebellum, human brain evolution, great apes, neocortex, cognitive evolution, technical intelligence, social intelligence, language evolution, anthropoid primates, sensorimotor control
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebellum, Humans, Phylogeny, Time Factors, Hominidae, Neocortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review