The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective
Holmstrom, B. (1999) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00083 · Cited by 3,172
Cited by
Some Simple Economics of Open Source
Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2002) · The Journal of Industrial Economics · doi:10.1111/1467-6451.00174 · Cited by 2,355
Open source software and the “private-collective” innovation model: Issues for organization science
Hippel, E. V., & Krogh, G. V. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.209.14992 · Cited by 2,145
Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software
West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x · Cited by 1,136
Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development
Shah, S. K. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0553 · Cited by 894
Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development1
von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., & Wallin, M. W. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703471 · Cited by 698
Boundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies
O'Mahony, S., & Bechky, B. A. (2008) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.53.3.422 · Cited by 626
Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple’s iOS Service System1
Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C., & Yoo, Y. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.1.10 · Cited by 583
Group Size and Incentives to Contribute: A Natural Experiment at Chinese Wikipedia
Zhang, X. (., & Zhu, F. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.4.1601 · Cited by 499
Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation
West, J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2008) · Industry and Innovation · doi:10.1080/13662710802033734 · Cited by 497
Self-citationRelationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms
Dahlander, L., & Magnusson, M. G. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.003 · Cited by 485
Validity Issues in the Use of Social Network Analysis with Digital Trace Data
University of Texas at Austin, Howison, J., Wiggins, A., Syracuse University, Crowston, K., & Syracuse University (2011) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00282 · Cited by 369
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2015) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2015.0042 · Cited by 343
Neither market nor hierarchy nor network: The emergence of bazaar governance
Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2006) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840606067250 · Cited by 273
Barrett, M., Oborn, E., & Orlikowski, W. (2016) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0648 · Cited by 269
Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: a multidimensional perspective
Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21278 · Cited by 263
Open collaboration for innovation: Principles and performance
Levine, S. S., & Prietula, M. J. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0872 · Cited by 263
Defining and identifying disruptive innovations
Nagy, D., Schuessler, J., & Dubinsky, A. (2016) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.017 · Cited by 260
SuggestBot: using intelligent task routing to help people find work in wikipedia
Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2007) · Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces · doi:10.1145/1216295.1216309 · Cited by 245
Content Contribution for Revenue Sharing and Reputation in Social Media: A Dynamic Structural Model
Tang, Q., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2012) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222290203 · Cited by 243
Butler, B., Joyce, E., & Pike, J. (2008) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357227 · Cited by 235
Collaboration Through Open Superposition: A Theory of the Open Source Way1
Howison, J., & Crowston, K. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.1.02 · Cited by 175
Engaging Voluntary Contributions in Online Communities: A Hidden Markov Model1
Chen, W., Wei, X., & Zhu, K. X. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/14196 · Cited by 173
Who Will Stay in the FLOSS Community? Modeling Participant’s Initial Behavior
Zhou, M., & Mockus, A. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2014.2349496 · Cited by 141
Huang, P., Tafti, A., & Mithas, S. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/13490 · Cited by 133
Seven dimensions of contemporary participation disentangled
Kelty, C., Panofsky, A., Currie, M., Crooks, R., Erickson, S., Garcia, P., Wartenbe, M., & Wood, S. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23202 · Cited by 124
(2003) · Cited by 123
Over the Shoulder Learning: Supporting Brief Informal Learning
Twidale, M. B. (2005) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-005-9007-7 · Cited by 116
Sustainability of Free/Libre Open Source Projects: A Longitudinal Study
University at Albany, Chengalur-Smith, I., Sidorova, A., University of North Texas, Daniel, S., & University of Pittsburgh (2010) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00244 · Cited by 97
Copy, transform, combine: Exploring the remix as a form of innovation
Flath, C. M., Friesike, S., Wirth, M., & Thiesse, F. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-017-0043-9 · Cited by 96
LemonAid: selection-based crowdsourced contextual help for web applications
Chilana, P. K., Ko, A. J., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2012) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208620 · Cited by 79
Folding and Unfolding: Balancing Openness and Transparency in Open Source Communities
Shaikh, M., & Vaast, E. (2016) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0646 · Cited by 78
(2007) · Cited by 69
Understanding Human-Machine Networks: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey
Tsvetkova, M., Yasseri, T., Meyer, E. T., Pickering, J. B., Engen, V., Walland, P., Lüders, M., Følstad, A., & Bravos, G. (2018) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3039868 · Cited by 67
Acceptance of Monetary Rewards in Open Source Software Development
Krishnamurthy, S., Ou, S., & Tripathi, A. K. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.007 · Cited by 65
Reputation in an open source software community: Antecedents and impacts
Cai, Y., & Zhu, D. (2016) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.08.004 · Cited by 43
Learning by Thinking: How Reflection Aids Performance
Di Stefano, G., Pisano, G., & Staats, B. R. (2015) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2015.12709abstract · Cited by 42
Sauer, R. M. (2007) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grm034 · Cited by 25
Trust and Community in Open Source Software Production
Osterloh, M., & Rota, S. (2004) · Analyse & Kritik · doi:10.1515/auk-2004-0115 · Cited by 23
Renegotiating Public Value with Co-Production
Cordella, A., Paletti, A., & Shaikh, M. (2018) · Oxford Scholarship Online · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198816225.003.0008 · Cited by 15
Task‐Based Structures in Open Source Software: Revisiting the Onion Model
Christian, J., & Vu, A. N. (2021) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12428 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Lakhani, K. R., & von Hippel, E.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 923-943
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3121647552
- Cited by
- 1,596
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 117.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
