Cited by 263Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

MMR vaccination and pervasive developmental disorders: a case-control study

Smeeth, Liam, Cook, Claire, Fombonne, Eric, Heavey, Lisa, Rodrigues, Laura C, Smith, Peter G, Hall, Andrew J·2004·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Concern that measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination might cause autism has led to a fall in vaccine coverage. We investigated whether MMR vaccination is associated with an increased risk of autism or other pervasive developmental disorders.Methods We did a matched case-control study using the UK General Practice Research Database. Cases were people born in 1973 or later who had first recorded diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder while registered with a contributing general practice between 1987 and 2001. Controls were matched on age, sex, and general practice.Findings 1294 cases and 4469 controls were included. 1010 cases (78.1%) had MMR vaccination recorded before diagnosis, compared with 3671 controls (82.1%) before the age at which their matched case was diagnosed. After adjustment for age at joining the database, the odds ratio for association between MMR and pervasive developmental disorder was 0.86 (95% CI 0.68-1.09). Findings were similar when restricted to children with a diagnosis of autism, to those vaccinated with MMR before the third birthday, or to the period before media coverage of the hypothesis linking MMR with autism.Interpretation Our findings suggest that MMR vaccination is not associated with an increased risk of pervasive developmental disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(04)17020-7

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smeeth 2004 concluded that their study added to the evidence that MMR vaccination was not associated with an increased risk of PDDs.

    “The authors concluded that their study added to the evidence that MMR vaccination was not associated with an increased risk of PDDs.”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Smeeth 2004

  • In Smeeth 2004, the findings were similar when analysis was restricted to children with a diagnosis of autism only, to MMR vaccination before their third birthday, or to the period prior to media coverage of the hypothesis linking MMR vaccination with autism.

    “The findings were similar when analysis was restricted to children with a diagnosis of autism only, to MMR vaccination before their third birthday, or to the period prior to media coverage of the hypothesis linking MMR vaccination with autism.”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Smeeth 2004

  • In Smeeth 2004, the OR for the association between MMR vaccination and PDDs was 0.86 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.09) for the practice matched control group.

    “0.86 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.09) for the practice matched control group.”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Smeeth 2004

  • In Smeeth 2004, the OR for the association between MMR vaccination and PDDs was 0.78 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.97) for the non-practice matched control group.

    “The OR for the association between MMR vaccination and PDDs was 0.78 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.97) for the non-practice matched control group”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Smeeth 2004

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smeeth, L., Cook, C., Fombonne, E., Heavey, L., Rodrigues, L. C., Smith, P. G., & Hall, A. J.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Montreal Children's Hospital (CA)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Smeeth, Liam
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
364
Issue
9438
Pages
963-969
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2107557001
Cited by
263
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
25.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
MMR vaccination, MMR vaccine, autism spectrum disorder, pervasive developmental disorders, vaccine safety, autism risk, vaccine coverage decline, childhood immunization
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Asperger Syndrome, Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review