Cited by 1,225SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVirus-based gene therapy researchCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial

Open access
Zhu, Feng-Cai, Guan, Xu-Hua, Li, Yu-Hua, Huang, Jian-Ying, Jiang, Tao, Hou, Li-Hua, Li, Jing-Xin, Yang, Bei-Fang +21 more·2020·The Lancet

Abstract

Background This is the first randomised controlled trial for assessment of the immunogenicity and safety of a candidate non-replicating adenovirus type-5 (Ad5)-vectored COVID-19 vaccine, aiming to determine an appropriate dose of the candidate vaccine for an efficacy study. Methods This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of the Ad5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine was done in a single centre in Wuhan, China. Healthy adults aged 18 years or older, who were HIV-negative and previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection-free, were eligible to participate and were randomly assigned to receive the vaccine at a dose of 1 × 10 11 viral particles per mL or 5 × 10 10 viral particles per mL, or placebo. Investigators allocated participants at a ratio of 2:1:1 to receive a single injection intramuscularly in the arm. The randomisation list (block size 4) was generated by an independent statistician. Participants, investigators, and staff undertaking laboratory analyses were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoints for immunogenicity were the geometric mean titres (GMTs) of specific ELISA antibody responses to the receptor binding domain (RBD) and neutralising antibody responses at day 28. The primary endpoint for safety evaluation was the incidence of adverse reactions within 14 days. All recruited participants who received at least one dose were included in the primary and safety analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04341389. Findings 603 volunteers were recruited and screened for eligibility between April 11 and 16, 2020. 508 eligible participants (50% male; mean age 39·7 years, SD 12·5) consented to participate in the trial and were randomly assigned to receive the vaccine (1 × 10 11 viral particles n=253; 5 × 10 10 viral particles n=129) or placebo (n=126). In the 1 × 10 11 and 5 × 10 10 viral particles dose groups, the RBD-specific ELISA antibodies peaked at 656·5 (95% CI 575·2-749·2) and 571·0 (467·6-697·3), with seroconversion rates at 96% (95% CI 93-98) and 97% (92-99), respectively, at day 28. Both doses of the vaccine induced significant neutralising antibody responses to live SARS-CoV-2, with GMTs of 19·5 (95% CI 16·8-22·7) and 18·3 (14·4-23·3) in participants receiving 1 × 10 11 and 5 × 10 10 viral particles, respectively. Specific interferon γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay responses post vaccination were observed in 227 (90%, 95% CI 85-93) of 253 and 113 (88%, 81-92) of 129 participants in the 1 × 10 11 and 5 × 10 10 viral particles dose groups, respectively. Solicited adverse reactions were reported by 183 (72%) of 253 and 96 (74%) of 129 participants in the 1 × 10 11 and 5 × 10 10 viral particles dose groups, respectively. Severe adverse reactions were reported by 24 (9%) participants in the 1 × 10 11 viral particles dose group and one (1%) participant in the 5 × 10 10 viral particles dose group. No serious adverse reactions were documented. Interpretation The Ad5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine at 5 × 10 10 viral particles is safe, and induced significant immune responses in the majority of recipients after a single immunisation. Funding National Key R&D Programme of China, National Science and Technology Major Project, and CanSino Biologics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31605-6

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-term homologous prime-boost with identical viral-vectored vaccines may be limited by anti-vector immunity.

    “In the long term, a strategy involving homologous prime–boost with identical viral-vectored vaccines may be limited by anti-vector immunity12,91,92.”
  • Gam-COVID-Vac uses different adenovirus vectors for each dose, which circumvents anti-vector immunity that could inhibit anti-S responses, as seen with Ad5-nCoV and non-COVID-19 adenovirus-based vaccines.

    “This may be, in part, due to the fact that Gam-COVID-Vac uses different adenovirus vectors for each dose (adenovirus 26 for dose one and adenovirus 5 for dose two), thus circumventing the potential problem of anti-vector immunity that could inhibit anti-S responses, as has been identified for Ad5-nCoV (refs12,91) (Table 1) and non-COVID-19 adenovirus-based vaccines92.”
  • CD8+ T cell responses to candidate COVID-19 vaccines in humans or non-human primates are either largely absent or not measured in the current literature.

    “CD8+ T cell responses to candidate COVID-19 vaccines in humans or non-human primates are either largely absent or not measured in the current literature”

    From Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 (2021) · cites this paper as Zhu et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, F.-C., Guan, X.-H., Li, Y.-H., Huang, J.-Y., Jiang, T., Hou, L.-H., Li, J.-X., Yang, B.-F., Wang, L., Wang, W.-J., Wu, S.-P., Wang, Z., Wu, X.-H., Xu, J.-J., Zhang, Z., Jia, S.-Y., Wang, B.-S., Hu, Y., Liu, J.-J., Zhang, J., Qian, X.-A., Li, Q., Pan, H.-X., Jiang, H.-D., Deng, P., Gou, J.-B., Wang, X.-W., Wang, X.-H., & Chen, W.
Affiliations
  • Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
  • National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (CN)
  • Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (CN)
  • Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology (CN)
  • Academy of Military Medical Sciences (CN)
  • Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
  • CanSino (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Wei
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
396
Issue
10249
Pages
479-488
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3042383115
Cited by
1,225
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 253 · 2021: 489 · 2020: 193
FWCI
35.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reponame:Expeditio Repositorio Institucional UJTL
Funders
  • Wuhan University
  • Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
  • National Science and Technology Major Project
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
adenovirus type 5 vector, COVID-19 vaccines, SARS-CoV-2, vaccine immunogenicity, vaccine safety, dose comparison, neutralizing antibodies, receptor-binding domain antibodies, antibody response, adverse events, healthy adults, Wuhan, China
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Adenoviridae, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Viral, China, Double-Blind Method, Female, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, T-Lymphocytes, Viral Vaccines, Coronavirus Infections, Young Adult, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Pandemics, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review