Cited by 4,341SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAnimal Virus Infections StudiesViral Infections and Outbreaks Research

Receptor Recognition by the Novel Coronavirus from Wuhan: an Analysis Based on Decade-Long Structural Studies of SARS Coronavirus

Open access
Wan, Yushun, Shang, Jian, Graham, Rachel, Baric, Ralph S., Li, Fang·2020·Journal of Virology

Abstract

The recent emergence of Wuhan coronavirus (2019-nCoV) puts the world on alert. 2019-nCoV is reminiscent of the SARS-CoV outbreak in 2002 to 2003. Our decade-long structural studies on the receptor recognition by SARS-CoV have identified key interactions between SARS-CoV spike protein and its host receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which regulate both the cross-species and human-to-human transmissions of SARS-CoV. One of the goals of SARS-CoV research was to build an atomic-level iterative framework of virus-receptor interactions to facilitate epidemic surveillance, predict species-specific receptor usage, and identify potential animal hosts and animal models of viruses. Based on the sequence of 2019-nCoV spike protein, we apply this predictive framework to provide novel insights into the receptor usage and likely host range of 2019-nCoV. This study provides a robust test of this reiterative framework, providing the basic, translational, and public health research communities with predictive insights that may help study and battle this novel 2019-nCoV.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jvi.00127-20

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The receptor-binding domain directly contacts ACE-2 and contributes to host-cell attachment.

    “RBD contains a core structure and a variable receptor-binding motif (RBM; 437–508 a.a.) which interacts and attaches with the host cell ACE-2 receptor (Fig. 2) [7].”

    From Waves and variants of SARS-CoV-2: understanding the causes and effect of the COVID-19 catastrophe (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) states that the SARS-CoV RBD has a core and an RBM that binds ACE2, and links RBD–ACE2 affinity to initial host-cell attachment. The Results model ACE2 recognition by the 2019-nCoV RBD. The cited sentence’s specific RBM range of amino acids 437–508 is not established in the passages from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The RBD contains a core structure and a variable receptor-binding motif (RBM; residues 437-508) that interacts with and attaches to the host ACE-2 receptor.

    “RBD contains a core structure and a variable receptor-binding motif (RBM; 437–508 a.a.) which interacts and attaches with the host cell ACE-2 receptor (Fig. 2) [7].”

    From Waves and variants of SARS-CoV-2: understanding the causes and effect of the COVID-19 catastrophe (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Introduction (page not provided) says the SARS-CoV RBD has a core structure and an RBM that binds ACE2; the Results discuss ACE2-interacting residues in the 2019-nCoV RBM. Our copy does not give the claimed RBM boundaries of residues 437–508, so it does not support that specific range. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wan, Y., Shang, J., Graham, R., Baric, R. S., & Li, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Fang
Venue
Journal of Virology
Published
2020-03-17
Volume
94
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 0022-538X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-5514
OpenAlex
W3004348779
Cited by
4,341
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 170 · 2023: 299 · 2022: 619 · 2021: 1273 · 2020: 1865 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
133.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI089728, R01AI110700)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, spike protein, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, receptor recognition, host range prediction, interspecies transmission, human-to-human transmission, animal models, disease surveillance
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Betacoronavirus, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, China, Chiroptera, Humans, Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A, Models, Molecular, Phylogeny, Pneumonia, Viral, Receptors, Virus, Sequence Alignment, Coronavirus Infections, Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus, Host Specificity, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review