Cited by 749Mental Health Treatment and AccessMental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychology and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 305 of the 307 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 348 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health

Open access

Abstract

Graham Thornicroft*, Charlene Sunkel*, Akmal Alikhon Aliev, Sue Baker, Elaine Brohan, Rabih el Chammay, Kelly Davies, Mekdes Demissie, Joshua Duncan, Wubalem Fekadu, Petra C Gronholm, Zoe Guerrero, Dristy Gurung, Kassahun Habtamu, Charlotte Hanlon, Eva Heim, Claire Henderson, Zeinab Hijazi, Claire Hoffman, Nadine Hosny, Fiona-Xiaofei Huang, Sarah Kline, Brandon A Kohrt, Heidi Lempp, Jie Li, Elisha London, Ning Ma, Winnie W S Mak, Akerke Makhmud, Pallab K Maulik, Maria Milenova, Guadalupe Morales Cano, Uta Ouali, Sarah Parry, Thara Rangaswamy, Nicolas Rüsch, Taha Sabri, Norman Sartorius, Marianne Schulze, Heather Stuart, Tatiana Taylor Salisbury, Norha Vera San Juan, Nicole Votruba, Petr Winkler

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01470-2

Cites

305 of 305 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

260 Not checked yet · 62 Own result · 57 No basis given · 32 Own interpretation · 11 Own method · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 346 references — free account

Show all 227 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 155
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 72
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
197 of 197
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The global survey respondents are representative of people with lived experience of mental health conditions worldwide.

    “In a global, multilanguage survey of PWLE, 391 people responded from 45 countries and territories.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The findings of the umbrella review of 216 systematic reviews are generalisable to all countries and cultures worldwide.

    “Our umbrella review of 216 systematic reviews shows that interventions based on the principle of social contact (whether in person, virtual, or indirect) that have been appropriately adapted to different contexts and cultures are the most effective ways to reduce stigmatisation worldwide”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The lessons from the ten large-scale anti-stigma programmes are applicable to other programmes and contexts.

    “Our evaluation of ten large-scale anti-stigma programmes around the world found that they are most effective when they involve people with lived experience of mental health conditions (PWLE) as co-producers in all aspects of development, when target groups are consulted on programme content and delivery, and when programmes are sustained over the long term”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Diagnoses are necessary for communication among health workers, people with lived experience, family members, and policy makers, and for planning and financing treatment and care.

    “Throughout this report, however, we assume that diagnoses are necessary for reasons of communication for health workers, PWLE, family members, and policy makers, and for planning and financing treatments and care.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Culture strongly influences stigma by determining what behaviour is socially acceptable and by shaping beliefs about the causes and treatment of mental health conditions.

    “Culture has a strong influence on stigma because of the role that culture plays in determining what is considered”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The selected case studies are representative of different types of anti-stigma interventions across a wide variety of geographical and cultural locations and with diverse target groups.

    “We selected case studies purposively that were representative of different types of anti-stigma interventions in a wide variety of geographical and cultural locations and with diverse target groups (panel 3, table 1).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mental health care is scarce in low-resource settings.

    “Although mental health care is scarce in low-resource settings, the services that do exist are often institutionalising and may reinforce stigma or exclusion.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The media have great power over citizens and shape perceptions of reality and interpretation of the world.

    “The media wield great power over citizens and influence perceptions of reality and interpretation of the world.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Media messaging affects all elements of stigma, including knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours.

    “Media messaging affects all elements of stigma, including knowledge, attitudes, behaviours.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Media can be beneficial or harmful for stigma.

    “Media can be beneficial (actively reducing stigma) or harmful (perpetuating stereotypes or negative attitudes or behaviours).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    For many young people, social media are among their most vital tools for community, self-expression, and challenging stigma.

    “For many young people social media are among their most vital tools for community, self-expression, and for challenging stigma.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Until about 20 years ago, traditional media were the main source of mass information and professional journalists were almost exclusively the disseminators of news and information.

    “Until only about 20 years ago, these media were the main source of mass information and professional journalists were almost exclusively the ones who served as disseminators of news and information.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Several anti-stigma programmes have identified the media as a target group for interventions.

    “For this reason several anti-stigma programmes have identified the media as a target group for interventions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Adherence to suicide reporting guidelines is especially low in LMICs, where suicides are often sensationalised, stigmatised, and even criminalised in media portrayals.

    “Adherence to suicide reporting guidelines is especially low in LMICs, where suicides are often sensationalised, stigmatised, and even criminalised in their portrayals in the media.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Hindu newspaper follows suicide reporting guidelines, accompanies every suicide report with helpline contact details, and has been recognised by Sneha for excellence in reporting and prevention of suicides.

    “A notable exception in India is the national newspaper The Hindu, which does follow guidelines.Every report of a suicide is accompanied by helpline contact details for people who need support.The Hindu has been recognised by the support hotline Sneha for its excellence in the reporting and prevention of suicides.”
15 of 15

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 307 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Henderson, 2014, Mental health-related stigma in health care and mental health-care settings, Lancet Psychiatry, 1, 467, 10.1016/s2215-0366(14)00023-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Valic, 2013, A review of the literature and media reports of patterns of mental health stigma and addressing stigma in Slovenia until 2010, Zdr Varst, 52, 47

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 749

Metadata

Authors
Thornicroft, G., Sunkel, C., Alikhon Aliev, A., Baker, S., Brohan, E., el Chammay, R., Davies, K., Demissie, M., Duncan, J., Fekadu, W., Gronholm, P. C., Guerrero, Z., Gurung, D., Habtamu, K., Hanlon, C., Heim, E., Henderson, C., Hijazi, Z., Hoffman, C., Hosny, N., Huang, F.-X., Kline, S., Kohrt, B. A., Lempp, H., Li, J., London, E., Ma, N., Mak, W. W. S., Makhmud, A., Maulik, P. K., Milenova, M., Morales Cano, G., Ouali, U., Parry, S., Rangaswamy, T., Rüsch, N., Sabri, T., Sartorius, N., Schulze, M., Stuart, H., Taylor Salisbury, T., Vera San Juan, N., Votruba, N., & Winkler, P.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Mind (GB)
  • Haramaya University (ET)
  • Bahir Dar University (ET)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (CZ)
  • Addis Ababa University (ET)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
  • United Nations Children's Fund (US)
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Tunis University (TN)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Thornicroft, Graham
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
400
Issue
10361
Pages
1438-1480
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W4303940215
Cited by
748
References
307
Citations by year
2026: 190 · 2025: 220 · 2024: 209 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 8
FWCI
20.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/R023697/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
mental health stigma, discrimination against people with mental illness, stigma reduction, lived experience, people with lived experience, co-production, mental health policy, mental health law, mental health services
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Social Stigma, Social Discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review