The DOI matches its Crossref record; 305 of the 307 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 348 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health
Open accessAbstract
Graham Thornicroft*, Charlene Sunkel*, Akmal Alikhon Aliev, Sue Baker, Elaine Brohan, Rabih el Chammay, Kelly Davies, Mekdes Demissie, Joshua Duncan, Wubalem Fekadu, Petra C Gronholm, Zoe Guerrero, Dristy Gurung, Kassahun Habtamu, Charlotte Hanlon, Eva Heim, Claire Henderson, Zeinab Hijazi, Claire Hoffman, Nadine Hosny, Fiona-Xiaofei Huang, Sarah Kline, Brandon A Kohrt, Heidi Lempp, Jie Li, Elisha London, Ning Ma, Winnie W S Mak, Akerke Makhmud, Pallab K Maulik, Maria Milenova, Guadalupe Morales Cano, Uta Ouali, Sarah Parry, Thara Rangaswamy, Nicolas Rüsch, Taha Sabri, Norman Sartorius, Marianne Schulze, Heather Stuart, Tatiana Taylor Salisbury, Norha Vera San Juan, Nicole Votruba, Petr Winkler
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
261 Not checked yet · 62 Own result · 57 No basis given · 32 Own interpretation · 11 Own method · 1 Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“stigma and discrimination negatively affect most PWLE”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plaindirectn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our umbrella review of 216 systematic reviews shows that interventions based on the principle of social contact (whether in person, virtual, or indirect) that have been appropriately adapted to different contexts and cultures are the most effective ways to reduce stigmatisation worldwide”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
“The clearly emerging core finding is that forms of social contact (direct or indirect) between people who do and do not have lived experience of mental health conditions is the most effective evidence-based way to reduce stigmatisation.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the media could play a crucial part in reducing stigma and discrimination”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
hedgedn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“when target groups are consulted on programme content and delivery”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“stigma and discrimination can be worse than the impact of the mental health condition itself”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the media are an important factor in worsening stigma and discrimination”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most (≥70%) participants agreed that PWLE should be treated as equal to people with physical health conditions”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, many people describe stigma as being worse than the condition itself.”
- Also stated in: § Aims and scope of the Commission · boosted
“Indeed, as this report will demonstrate, many people with such conditions describe stigma as being worse than the condition itself.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Aims and scope of the Commission · boosted
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our evaluation of ten large-scale anti-stigma programmes around the world found that they are most effective when they involve people with lived experience of mental health conditions (PWLE) as co-producers in all aspects of development, when target groups are consulted on programme content and delivery, and when programmes are sustained over the long term”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“when programmes are sustained over the long term”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“People who responded to our lived experience survey reported experiences of discrimination in all aspects of their lives, from blatant discrimination in social interactions and at work, to social isolation and loneliness, shame and secrecy, and damaged marital prospects.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Stigma stress has been associated with increased suicidality.55”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [55] Xu, 2018, Involuntary hospitalization, stigma stress and suicidality: a longitudinal study, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three studies, two from Africa and one from Europe, reported participants' beliefs that public stigma led to inadequate funding and provision of health care.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural impacts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some of these effects were mediated by self-stigma and lack of social support.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several qualitative studies from different parts of the world described discriminatory laws or judicial practices arising from public stigma, for instance, using an unsubstantiated allegation of dangerousness against a PWLE in a court ruling.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural impacts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Two studies from African countries described public stigma as a barrier for PWLE to be involved in policy making.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural impacts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In more collectivistic cultures, there was a stronger link between self-stigma and experienced discrimination.51”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [51] Yu, 2021, Internalization process of stigma of people with mental illness across cultures: a meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach, Clin Psychol Rev source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One English study described respondents' experience of going through the process of welfare benefit applications as stigmatising.59”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [59] Hamilton, 2016, Qualitative analysis of mental health service users' reported experiences of discrimination, Acta Psychiatr Scand source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Among young people at risk of psychosis, high stigma stress raises the rate of transition to schizophrenia after 1 year.56”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] Rüsch, 2015, Stigma as a stressor and transition to schizophrenia after one year among young people at risk of psychosis, Schizophr Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Higher levels of stigma reduce help-seeking and healthservice use in several ways.49”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Gabbidon, 2014, Discrimination attributed to mental illness or race-ethnicity by users of community psychiatric services, Psychiatr Serv source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Psychosocial interventions, even in HICs and many with proven effectiveness, are often not implemented, for example those offering help with employment, housing, or family interventions. 1”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Rüsch, 2022
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Our review identified only qualitative and no quantitative papers on structural discrimination as a consequence of public stigma.49”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Gabbidon, 2014, Discrimination attributed to mental illness or race-ethnicity by users of community psychiatric services, Psychiatr Serv source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many cross-sectional and longitudinal studies identified in our review reported the impacts of stigma and discrimination on health-related outcomes, such as symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis, substance use conditions, suicidality, physical symptoms, disability, and recovery.49,65,66”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care and social-care effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Gabbidon, 2014, Discrimination attributed to mental illness or race-ethnicity by users of community psychiatric services, Psychiatr Serv source
- Not checked yetcites [65] Pyle, 2014, “It's just a very taboo and secretive kind of thing”: making sense of living with stigma and discrimination from accounts of people with psychosis, Psychosis source
- Not checked yetcites [66] Burke, 2016, Experiences of stigma in psychosis: a qualitative analysis of service users' perspectives, Psychosis source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“These studies showed that such forms of stigma negatively affected clinical and personal recovery outcomes.67”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care and social-care effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [67] Mak, 2017, A cross-diagnostic investigation of the differential impact of discrimination on clinical and personal recovery, Psychiatr Serv source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The link between selfstigma and self-harm or suicidality was particularly strong among young people.52”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [52] Eliasson, 2021, Unpacking stigma: meta-analyses of correlates and moderators of personal stigma in psychosis, Clin Psychol Rev source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“over 90% agreed that PWLE should be treated as well as people with physical health conditions”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plainn = 300- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“People with mental health conditions who perceived greater public stigma found their own condition more threatening than other respondents.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The key lessons that emerge include involving PWLE in all aspects of co-producing antistigma programmes”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, most evidence on these effects are from North America, Europe, and east Asia.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care and social-care effects
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-stigma is positively associated with a why try effect, which leads people not even to attempt important activities (eg, applying for a job) because of the expectation of failure.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Prejudice by healthcare staff has been linked with worsened health outcomes and physical health care because of diagnostic overshadowing, in which physical symptoms are misattributed to mental health conditions.74,75”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care and social-care effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [74] Knaak, 2017, Mental illness-related stigma in healthcare: barriers to access and care and evidence-based solutions, Healthc Manage Forum source
- Not checked yetcites [75] Jones, 2008, ‘Diagnostic overshadowing’: worse physical health care for people with mental illness, Acta Psychiatr Scand source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Stigma is also associated with low investment in mental health care.70”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care and social-care effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [70] DeLuca, 2017, Does individual stigma predict mental health funding attitudes? Toward an understanding of resource allocation and social Climate, Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although policies aimed to establish respect towards people with mental health conditions and to stipulate their rights, they fell short in effectively reducing discrimination.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural stigma Policies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In line with the concept of what matters most, stigma and discrimination drastically limit a person's active participation in society with respect to education, employment, establishing healthy and safe social interactions, and starting a family.1,46,49,79”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social and economic impact
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Rüsch, 2022
- Not checked yetcites [46] Yang, 2014, “What matters most:” a cultural mechanism moderating structural vulnerability and moral experience of mental illness stigma, Soc Sci Med source
- Not checked yetcites [49] Gabbidon, 2014, Discrimination attributed to mental illness or race-ethnicity by users of community psychiatric services, Psychiatr Serv source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additionally, housing conditions might be poor due to stigmatising attitudes of landlords who may refuse to have a tenant with a mental health condition.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In some east Asian countries, changing the name of schizophrenia was used as a strategy to reduce public stigma.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural stigma Policies
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More inclusive policies, legislation, and plans that were more effective in reducing stigma were generally linked with community-based treatment, programmes of public education, and media activities, including participation of champions who had lived experience of mental health conditions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural stigma Policies
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Stigma and discrimination not only affect the labelled individual but also, by association, family members and carers, for example by damaging the marital prospects of siblings, or when parents are blamed for their child's condition.80”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Nigeria
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Moses, 2014, Stigma and family
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In employment settings, many people with mental health conditions decide not to disclose their condition due to fear of discrimination (figure 5).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One of the most salient stigma experiences in adolescents is the fear of social rejection.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Detrimental stigma outcomes in young people were mostly related to their need to preserve social identity and social capital.87,88”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [87] Moses, 2010, Being treated differently: stigma experiences with family, peers, and school staff among adolescents with mental health disorders, Soc Sci Med source
- Not checked yetcites [88] Gronholm, 2017, Mental health-related stigma and pathways to care for people at risk of psychotic disorders or experiencing first-episode psychosis: a systematic review, Psychol Med source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Evidence for stigmatisation of young people with mental health conditions has been found worldwide.84”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [84] Ferrie, 2020, Psychosocial outcomes of mental illness stigma in children and adolescents: a mixed-methods systematic review, Child Youth Serv Rev source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Young people in that survey also reported stigma perpetrated by school staff, who expressed fear, dislike, avoidance, and underestimation of their abilities.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found very few articles that review policies targeting mental health conditions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural stigma Policies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These forms of health discrimination contribute to reduced life expectancy among people with mental health conditions.43,[76][77][78]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care and social-care effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [43] Thornicroft, 2011, Physical health disparities and mental illness: the scandal of premature mortality, Br J Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [76] Henderson, 2014, Mental health-related stigma in health care and mental health-care settings, Lancet Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [77] Gissler, 2013, Patterns in mortality among people with severe mental disorders across birth cohorts: a register-based study of Denmark and Finland in 1982–2006, BMC Public Health source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The views of young people about mental health can differ from those of their parents, revealing important intergenerational perspectives.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
hedgedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“People also often report losing friends after disclosing a mental health condition.82”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [82] Lasalvia, 2015, Cross-national variations in reported discrimination among people treated for major depression worldwide: the ASPEN/INDIGO international study, Br J Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Lack of employ ment and income due to stigma are important contributors to poverty among people with mental health conditions.90”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [90] Trani, 2015, Mental illness, poverty and stigma in India: a case-control study, BMJ Open source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The State of the World's Children survey in 13 countries showed that families can also create substantial barriers to help seeking among adolescents.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [86] 2021
plaindirectn = 13- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effective efforts to address structural stigma at the policy level have included interventions through national mental health plans and policies and anti-discrimination laws for people with mental health conditions in care, at work, and in wider society.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural stigma Policies
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The anticipation of discrimination, such as the fear of being discredited by police, having to withdraw from educational activities, or being avoided by family, friends, neighbours, also accounts for substantial negative effects.42,79”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Nigeria
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [42] Moitra, 2022, The global gap in treatment coverage for major depressive disorder in 84 countries from 2000–2019: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-regression analysis, PLoS Med source
- Not checked yetcites [79] Lasalvia, 2013, Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by people with major depressive disorder: a cross-sectional survey, Lancet source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interventions included empowerment by involving the service users in decision making about their mental health condition and about appointments and follow-up schedules, and by identifying treatment goals.The effect size for these programmes increased progressively with rising number of specific treatment targets.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [104] Greene, 2016, Interventions to increase retention in mental health services: a systematic review, Psychiatr Serv source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a meta-analysis, they found significant improvements in attitudes or beliefs about seeking care could be seen in four of six studies (effect size -0•02 to 2•56).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Werlen, 2020, Interventions to improve children's access to mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Reviews of studies on interventions to support people into gaining work have also been published, covering intellectual disability, 110 autism, 111 severe mental health conditions, 112 and other mental health conditions.113”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [110] Nevala, 2019, The effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions on the employment and functioning of people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review, J Occup Rehabil source
- Not checked yetcites [111] Khalifa, 2020, Workplace accommodations for adults with autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review, Disabil Rehabil source
- Not checked yetcites [112] Kinoshita, 2013, Supported employment for adults with severe mental illness, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Eight (80%) of ten studies on treatment engagement for individuals at risk (eg, a family-based session to increase motivation during an emergency room visit) showed improved access to care with interventions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Werlen, 2020, Interventions to improve children's access to mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The most frequently used strategies were improving mental health knowledge, addressing stigmatising attitudes, and reducing behavioural barriers through psychoeducational approaches.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [104] Greene, 2016, Interventions to increase retention in mental health services: a systematic review, Psychiatr Serv source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Coalitions of stakeholders, often led by non-governmental organisations, mental health associations, and mental health professionals, with the participation of empowered PWLE, have been instrumental in advocating these changes.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural stigma Policies
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interventions that aim to reduce interpersonal stigma in the workplace have been evaluated, such as the Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) programme.108”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [108] Hanisch, 2016, The effectiveness of interventions targeting the stigma of mental illness at the workplace: a systematic review, BMC Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“44 reviews covered children, adolescents, teachers, parents, and university students (excluding health professions).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plainn = 44- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A review of the cost-effectiveness of initiatives to reduce stigma in the workplace found no eligible studies.109”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Nogues, 2018, Economic evaluations of workplace mental health interventions: a critical review, Can J Adm Sci source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Training managers to understand and support the mental health needs of employees was effective in improving mental-health-related knowledge, non-stigmatising attitudes, and self-reported supportive behaviour.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [106] Gayed, 2018, Effectiveness of training workplace managers to understand and support the mental health needs of employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Occup Environ Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is a knowledge gap for interventions addressing structural stigma experienced by people within mental health conditions in LMICs, where formal employment may be an exception.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the effect of such policies on people's lives, knowledge, attitudes and behaviours have not been assessed.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural stigma Policies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The authors also examined collaborative care training for primary care or community care staff, and they found long-term effects on mental health service use among individuals in primary care settings, including people with depression.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] Xu, 2018, Effectiveness of interventions to promote help-seeking for mental health problems: systematic review and meta-analysis, Psychol Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stigma and discrimination were addressed as primary outcomes in 19 (43%) of the included reviews.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Joshi and colleages 99 found that training health-care providers to share non-stigmatising messages with pregnant women who used opioids helped increase acceptability of services and access to care.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [99] Joshi, 2021, Women-centered drug treatment models for pregnant women with opioid use disorder: a scoping review, Drug Alcohol Depend source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“four of seven that measured social distance also reported improvements.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Waqas, 2020, Interventions to reduce stigma related to mental illnesses in educational institutes: a systematic review, Psychiatric Quarterly source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stigma was included as a secondary outcome in 25 studies that primarily focused on universal, selective, or indicated interventions to prevent mental health problems (appendix 3 pp 94-96).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One qualitative study included in the review by Morris and colleagues 118 found that a theme of difference (us and them) emerged after an intervention, which requires further investigation.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] Morris, 2021, Classroom-based peer interventions targeting autism ignorance, prejudice and/or discrimination: a systematic PRISMA review, Int J Incl Educ
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several reviews indicate that structured direct social contact involving children with disabilities and giving them equal status to children without disabilities can lead to improved attitudes among peers.[119][120][121]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] Sentenac, 2012, Peer victimization among school-aged children with chronic conditions, Epidemiol Rev source
- Not checked yetcites [120] McManus, 2021, A meta-analytic review of interventions to improve children's attitudes toward their peers with intellectual disabilities, Contemp Educ Psychol source
- Not checked yetcites [121] Louw, 2020, Enhancing social inclusion of young adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review of original empirical studies, J Appl Res Intellect Disabil source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Sentenac and colleagues 119 showed that peer victimisation was reduced after an average of 25 weeks of involvement in a programme using social contact to bring peers with and without disabilities together for shared activities in school and community settings.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [119] Sentenac, 2012, Peer victimization among school-aged children with chronic conditions, Epidemiol Rev source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Regarding prevention of poor mental health and mental health literacy programmes, results are more mixed.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“intervention 125 resulted in significant and sustained improvements in participants' attitudes towards suicide.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [125] Shannonhouse L, Lin YD, Shaw K, Wanna R, Porter M. Suicide intervention training for college staff: program evaluation and intervention skill measurement. J Am Coll Health 65: 450–56. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Four reviews concluded that the combination of multiple strategies was more effective than using any single strategy.[118][119][120]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] Morris, 2021, Classroom-based peer interventions targeting autism ignorance, prejudice and/or discrimination: a systematic PRISMA review, Int J Incl Educ
- Not checked yetcites [119] Sentenac, 2012, Peer victimization among school-aged children with chronic conditions, Epidemiol Rev source
- Not checked yetcites [120] McManus, 2021, A meta-analytic review of interventions to improve children's attitudes toward their peers with intellectual disabilities, Contemp Educ Psychol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a meta-analysis, Salazar de Pablo and colleagues 85 found a small effect for changes in attitudes towards people with mental health conditions across 16 studies involving youth of various ages (effect size Hedges g=0•18).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] Salazar de Pablo, 2020, Universal and selective interventions to promote good mental health in young people: systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur Neuropsychopharmacol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“most studies which assessed attitudes showed positive changes (eight of 11)”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Waqas, 2020, Interventions to reduce stigma related to mental illnesses in educational institutes: a systematic review, Psychiatric Quarterly source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“These strategies all had positive outcomes on stigma reduction.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [133] Hartog, 2020, Stigma reduction interventions for children and adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review of intervention strategies, Soc Sci Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Liang and colleagues 127 did a meta-analysis of MHFA among college students (aged 19-27 years) but found no significant effect on stigma-related attitudes across four studies.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [127] Liang, 2021, Mental health first aid improves mental health literacy among college students: a meta-analysis, J Am Coll Health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Stigma was widely measured in terms of social distance.142,143”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [142] Stubbs, 2014, Reducing mental illness stigma in health care students and professionals: a review of the literature, Australas Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [143] van Brakel, 2019, Out of the silos: identifying cross-cutting features of health-related stigma to advance measurement and intervention, BMC Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It is notable that studies reporting multiple kinds of contact (eg, live or filmed) were more often associated with better outcomes for knowledge and attitudes related to mental health than educational interventions alone.145”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [145] Lien, 2021, Challenging mental illness stigma in healthcare professionals and students: a systematic review and network meta-analysis, Psychol Health source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A randomised controlled trial in rural China showed that an enhanced social contact model is a promising method for reducing stigma among family members.141”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Family members
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [141] Ran, 2022, Effectiveness of enhancing contact model on reducing stigma of mental illness among family caregivers of persons with schizophrenia in rural China: a cluster randomized controlled trial, Lancet Reg Health West Pac
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Six reviews showed that disclosure of mental health conditions and discussion within families reduced mental health stigma.140”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Family members
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [140] Adu, 2021, Policies and interventions to reduce familial mental illness stigma: a scoping review of empirical literature, Issues Mental Health Nurs source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One review identified two original studies that showed reduced stigma within families after psychoeducation in China and Korea.137”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Family members
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [137] Armijo, 2013, Efficacy of community treatments for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: a literature review, Front Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Davies and colleagues 135 found that information about the levels of hereditary risks of mental health conditions was considered important so that young people do not feel conditions experienced by their parents will be inevitable for them.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Family members
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [135] Davies, 2022, Barriers, facilitators and interventions to support help-seeking amongst young people living in families impacted by parental mental illness: a systematized review, Early Interv Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, in two of the three studies assessed, digital video interventions and direct contact did not differ for attitudes toward people with mental health conditions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Ito-Jaeger, 2021, Digital video interventions and mental health literacy among young people: a scoping review, J Ment Health
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“56 reviews were published between 1994 and 2021 and focused on prequalifying stigma reduction programmes for trainees (eg, nursing and medical students) and in-service programmes for qualified staff.29”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Barber, 2019, Microaggressions towards people affected by mental health problems: a scoping review, Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Internet-based anti-stigma campaigns have also had positive effects on stigmatising attitudes among health-care staff.156”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [156] Zubala, 2019, Large-scale online education programmes and their potential to effect change in behaviour and practice of health and social care professionals: a rapid systematic review, Interact Learn Environ source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Only five studies met their minimum quality standards.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [129] Reis, 2022, The impact of mental health literacy training programs on the mental health literacy of university students: a systematic review, Prev Sci source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“LMICs are under-represented in the literature.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A review of digital video interventions that were tested among youth aged 15-25 years found that videos produced better outcomes than lectures or no intervention.131”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Ito-Jaeger, 2021, Digital video interventions and mental health literacy among young people: a scoping review, J Ment Health
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“At the same time, effects were higher for education-only interventions if they were delivered in internet and community settings.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [130] Patafio, 2021, A systematic mapping review of interventions to improve adolescent mental health literacy, attitudes, and behaviours, Early Interv Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Fully online multicomponent interventions, such as educational tutorials, case-based instruction, and practice-based learning, showed efficacy in stigma reduction. 155”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [155] Muirhead, 2021, Establishing the effectiveness of technology-enabled dementia education for health and social care practitioners: a systematic review, Syst Rev source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They found positive changes in attitudes (effect size d=0•36-1•18) after intervention and at follow-up (0•68-1•0).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [132] Anderson, 2019, Mental health training programs for secondary school teachers: a systematic review, School Mental Health source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One of the areas that has received increasing attention for health-care students and professionals is the use of simulations (eg, standardised role-plays with actors), which have consistently been associated with stigma reductions.147,153,157”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [147] Piot, 2020, Simulation in psychiatry for medical doctors: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Med Educ source
- Not checked yetcites [153] Carrara, 2021, Health care providers and people with mental illness: an integrative review on anti-stigma interventions, Int J Soc Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [157] Goh, 2021, Effects of online stigma-reduction programme for people experiencing mental health conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Ment Health Nurs source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“a comprehensive systematic mapping review of interventions used with adolescents aged 12-18 years found that a combination of education and social contact led to better outcomes than education alone.130”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [130] Patafio, 2021, A systematic mapping review of interventions to improve adolescent mental health literacy, attitudes, and behaviours, Early Interv Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In addition, interventions with two or more components had greater effects than those with one only.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [171] Clement, 2013, Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In this review, effect sizes were significantly greater after in-person contact than after video contact.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [168] Corrigan, 2012, Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: a meta-analysis of outcome studies, Psychiatr Serv source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In other reviews, the authors found that the concurrent use of several strategies, such as distribution of educational material, a media campaign, and training of gatekeepers and health-care professionals, appeared to be more effective than education alone.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis showed small to medium size reductions in prejudice, with standardised mean differences of -0•38, -0•38, and -0•49 immediately, 1-8 weeks, and 6-9 months after the intervention, respectively.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [171] Clement, 2013, Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“As in other reviews, there were methodological limitations, such as small unrepresentative samples and cross-sectional designs.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [173] Scior, 2011, Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs regarding intellectual disability: a systematic review, Res Dev Disabil source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A further key challenge is that few studies have used well adapted and validated outcome measures for stigma and discrimination, particularly in LMIC settings.26,[162][163][164][165][166]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Brohan, 2013, Development and psychometric evaluation of the Discrimination and Stigma Scale (DISC), Psychiatry Res source
- Not checked yetcites [162][163][164][165][166]
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In contrast, among children and adolescents, education yielded a larger effect than contact.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [168] Corrigan, 2012, Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: a meta-analysis of outcome studies, Psychiatr Serv source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Across 16 studies, five assessed discrimination.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [171] Clement, 2013, Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interventions were more likely to have a positive impact if the practice-based experience was preceded by an element of preparatory educational training.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Another recommendation was that the evidence for improving attitudes was greater among students treating patients with less severe conditions, from which recovery could be seen.160”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [160] Heim, 2020, Reducing mental health-related stigma among medical and nursing students in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review, Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“20 reviews assessed creation of mental health awareness, mental health education, and training the general population and other specific population groups.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Awareness creation, education, and training interventions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Hung and colleagues 174 found that the active involvement of PWLE in the design of such support provided a sense of value and autonomy.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [174] Hung, 2021, Creating dementia-friendly communities for social inclusion: a scoping review, Gerontol Geriatr Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Direct contact without preparation led to feelings of intimidation and inhibition when interacting with people with dementia.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A qualitative study focusing on intergenerational activities (eg, a choir) found that young adults' involvement resulted in reduced stigma towards people with dementia.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As noted previously, most of these were based on studies from HICs and upper MICs.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Awareness creation, education, and training interventions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Among students, all interventions targeting dementia led to improved comfort for patients.159”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [159] Alushi, 2015, Evaluation of dementia education programs for pre-registration healthcare students—a review of the literature, Nurse Educ Today source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The effect of awareness on help-seeking attitudes and behaviours is inconsistent.184,185”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [184] Bu, 2020, Mental health literacy intervention on help-seeking in athletes: a systematic review, Int J Environ Res Public Health source
- Not checked yetcites [185] Castaldelli-Maia, 2019, Mental health symptoms and disorders in elite athletes: a systematic review on cultural influencers and barriers to athletes seeking treatment, Br J Sports Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interventions that directly involved PWLE were more effective in reducing stigma than those that did not.[200][201][202][203]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [200][201][202][203]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Effectiveness did not differ significantly in reducing stigma between delivery methods for social contact interventions, such as face-to-face, imagined, or video.204”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [204] Maunder, 2019, Intergroup contact and mental health stigma: a comparative effectiveness meta-analysis, Clin Psychol Rev source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Public relations campaigns have resulted reductions in stigma about people with depression. 207”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Trinidad and Tobago
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [207] Seroalo, 2014, A critical synthesis of interventions to reduce stigma attached to mental illness, Health SA
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“29 reviews reported the effectiveness of social contact in reducing stigma or in improving knowledge and attitudes toward people with mental health conditions across different target populations.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“MHFA used with police officers, teachers, and other public sector workers has shown positive changes in behaviour.190”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [190] Booth, 2017, Mental health training programmes for non-mental health trained professionals coming into contact with people with mental ill health: a systematic review of effectiveness, BMC Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Social-contact-based education was superior to traditional educational approaches.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Advocacy programmes were assessed in one review, which concluded that efficacy was unknown.202”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Trinidad and Tobago
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [202] Pirkis, 2021, Suicide trends in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis of preliminary data from 21 countries, Lancet Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One review found that online methods were as effective as offline interventions in reducing stigmatising attitudes in the general population, 157”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Awareness creation, education, and training interventions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [157] Goh, 2021, Effects of online stigma-reduction programme for people experiencing mental health conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Ment Health Nurs source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the primary studies included in the reviews were done in HICs.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, a metaanalysis of 18 trials with nearly 6000 MHFA course participants assessed attitude changes and found only minimal positive effects (d=0•12).192”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [192] Morgan, 2018, Systematic review and meta-analysis of Mental health first aid training: effects on knowledge, stigma, and helping behaviour, PLoS One source
plainn = 6,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Social contact had a consistently positive effect on reducing stigmatising attitudes, perceived stigma in help seeking, and social distance.186,195,198,[203][204][205][206][207][208]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [186] Griffiths, 2014, Effectiveness of programs for reducing the stigma associated with mental disorders. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, World Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [195] Doley, 2017, Interventions to reduce the stigma of eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Eat Disord source
- Not checked yetcites [198] Morgan, 2018, Interventions to reduce stigma towards people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis, J Psychiatr Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The effectiveness of online awareness-raising activities was mixed.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Awareness creation, education, and training interventions
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One review indicated that psychoeducation for caregivers had no significant effect on attitudes, empathy, or positive aspects of caregiving when compared with controls.189”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [189] Han, 2020, Interventions for attitudes and empathy toward people with dementia and positive aspects of caregiving: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Res Aging source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Only one review included studies from Africa (Tanzania and Malawi).181”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Awareness creation, education, and training interventions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [181] O'Connell, 2021, Child mental health literacy training programmes for professionals in contact with children: a systematic review, Early Interv Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Combined interventions, particularly those including educational and social contact components, significantly reduced stigmatising attitudes and social distance.178,196,198,199”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [178] Mascayano, 2020, Including culture in programs to reduce stigma toward people with mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries, Transcult Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [196] Hawke, 2013, Stigma and bipolar disorder: a review of the literature, J Affect Disord source
- Not checked yetcites [198] Morgan, 2018, Interventions to reduce stigma towards people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis, J Psychiatr Res source
- Not checked yetcites [199] Morgan, 2021, Review of Australian initiatives to reduce stigma towards people with complex mental illness: what exists and what works?, Int J Ment Health Syst source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the studies were done in HICs (eg, Australia, Japan, the UK, the USA, and western European countries) and upper MICs (eg, Brazil, Chile, China, and Türkiye).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Simulated symptoms
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and in another internet programmes were at least as effective as face-toface delivery in reducing personal stigma.190”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Awareness creation, education, and training interventions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [190] Booth, 2017, Mental health training programmes for non-mental health trained professionals coming into contact with people with mental ill health: a systematic review of effectiveness, BMC Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Various types of advocacy methods, such as individual or group sessions, and distribution of printed materials (eg, fotonovelas and brochures) can reduce stigma related to mental health conditions.215”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Trinidad and Tobago
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [215] Pérez-Flores, 2021, Effectiveness of mental health literacy and stigma interventions for Latino/a adults in the United States: a systematic review, Stigma Health source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In Germany the Honest, Open, Proud programme for adolescents with mental health conditions was thought to be cost-effective.240”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Cost-effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [240] Mulfinger, 2018, Honest, open, proud for adolescents with mental illness: pilot randomized controlled trial, J Child Psychol Psychiatry source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Community-based mental health care was described as less stigmatising than hospital care.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The use of support networks decreased negative attitudes towards suicide.217”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [217] Takada, 2010, Characteristics and effects of suicide prevention programs: comparison between workplace and other settings, Ind Health source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only two reviews focused on LMICs.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This approach was subsequently also used to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Time to Change anti-stigma campaign in England and found that the campaign cost per person with improved intended behaviour was estimated at £4. 239”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Cost-effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [239] Evans-Lacko, 2013, Economic evaluation of the anti-stigma social marketing campaign in England 2009–2011, Br J Psychiatry Suppl source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“One review by Mills and colleagues 234 focused on self-help interventions to reduce self-stigma, and found a study that showed reduced helpseeking among refugee men with post-traumatic stress disorder.235”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [234] Mills, 2020, Self-help interventions to reduce self-stigma in people with mental health problems: a systematic literature review, Psychiatry Res source
- Not checked yetcites [235] Nickerson, 2020, ‘Tell Your Story’: a randomized controlled trial of an online intervention to reduce mental health stigma and increase help-seeking in refugee men with posttraumatic stress, Psychol Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Four reviews focused on collaborative community-based care interventions via social networking.98,140,179,217”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Zhang, 2019, Overview of stigma against psychiatric illnesses and advancements of anti-stigma activities in six Asian societies, Int J Environ Res Public Health source
- Not checked yetcites [140] Adu, 2021, Policies and interventions to reduce familial mental illness stigma: a scoping review of empirical literature, Issues Mental Health Nurs source
- Not checked yetcites [179] Nguyen, 2019, Informal mental health interventions for people with severe mental illness in low and lower middle-income countries: a systematic review of effectiveness, Int J Soc Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [217] Takada, 2010, Characteristics and effects of suicide prevention programs: comparison between workplace and other settings, Ind Health source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No reviews specifically evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anti-stigma interventions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Cost-effectiveness
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Social and financial assistance increased due to improved social inclusion.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interventions targeting specific mental health conditions were more effective in reducing all types of stigma.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Trinidad and Tobago
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Social networking led to the normalisation of people with mental health conditions.140”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [140] Adu, 2021, Policies and interventions to reduce familial mental illness stigma: a scoping review of empirical literature, Issues Mental Health Nurs source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In California, a campaign aimed at increasing help-seeking by reducing stigma found that for each US$1 spent there could be a $1251 benefits through increased employment because of improved health.237”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Cost-effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [237] Ashwood, 2017, Investment in social marketing campaign to reduce stigma and discrimination associated with mental illness yields positive economic benefits to California, Rand Health Q
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, evidence for whether or not protest programmes are effective in reducing stigma is generally lacking.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Trinidad and Tobago
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One modelling study used data from Scotland and found that if a campaign led to a 10% change in attitudes, costs could be reduced by £35 per person for those who had felt that people with mental health conditions are dangerous and by £186 per person among those who felt that the public needs protection from people with mental health conditions.238”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Cost-effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [238] McCrone, 2010, The economic impact of initiatives to reduce stigma: demonstration of a modelling approach, Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One review, though, found evidence from six studies (experimental and observational) of a relationship between the endorsement of biogenetic causes of mental health conditions and worse outcomes, namely increased pessimism about prognosis and recovery”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [223] Larkings, 2018, Do biogenetic causal beliefs reduce mental illness stigma in people with mental illness and in mental health professionals? A systematic review, Int J Ment Health Nurs source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reviews generally included studies that reported improvements in self-stigma or in similar outcomes, such as stigma stress or self-efficacy in the absence of a positive result for self-stigma.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Two other systematic reviews concluded that the outcomes of protest campaigns in reducing stigma are unknown.199,209”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Trinidad and Tobago
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [199] Morgan, 2021, Review of Australian initiatives to reduce stigma towards people with complex mental illness: what exists and what works?, Int J Ment Health Syst source
- Not checked yetcites [209] Stuart, 2016, Reducing the stigma of mental illness, Glob Ment Health (Camb) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, the experience of stigma was not reduced.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [179] Nguyen, 2019, Informal mental health interventions for people with severe mental illness in low and lower middle-income countries: a systematic review of effectiveness, Int J Soc Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Benefits to the state government were estimated to be $36 for each $1 spent on the campaign.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Cost-effectiveness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [237] Ashwood, 2017, Investment in social marketing campaign to reduce stigma and discrimination associated with mental illness yields positive economic benefits to California, Rand Health Q
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some of the better-funded programmed, such as the Time to Change in England, have closed.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many studies confirmed that the media can have both positive and negative influences on mental-health-related stigma and discrimination.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Results
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, considering the case studies, SMART Mental Health in India successfully used drama relevant to villagers in a rural area to share messages about mental health along with emphases on help seeking and personal recovery.248”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [248] Maulik, 2019, Longitudinal assessment of an anti-stigma campaign related to common mental disorders in rural India, Br J Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The selected case studies are representative of different types of anti-stigma interventions across a wide variety of geographical and cultural locations and with diverse target groups.
In the paper
“In contrast, positive and recovery-oriented accounts improved public attitudes.273”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [273] Corrigan, 2013, The effects of news stories on the stigma of mental illness, J Nerv Ment Dis source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Programme sustainability was reported as one of the greatest challenges.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most programmes went further and involved PWLE at the heart of planning, development, and refinement of the interventions and evaluation of the programme.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Involving PWLE in all levels of anti-stigma programmes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In Guangzhou, China, the project achieved positive results by integrating antistigma activities into the routine mental health training programme of health and care workers, including primary-health-care staff and community police officers.247”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Lessons learned
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [247] Li, 2019, Effectiveness of an anti-stigma training on improving attitudes and decreasing discrimination towards people with mental disorders among care assistant workers in Guangzhou, China, Int J Ment Health Syst source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some programmes have used generic scales, such as the Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale, 250 the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule, 251 or the Discrimination and Stigma Scale.26”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [250] Evans-Lacko, 2011, Development and psychometric properties of the reported and intended behaviour scale (RIBS): a stigma-related behaviour measure, Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci source
- Not checked yetcites [251] Evans-Lacko, 2010, Development and psychometric properties of the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule, Can J Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [26] Brohan, 2013, Development and psychometric evaluation of the Discrimination and Stigma Scale (DISC), Psychiatry Res source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The case studies in China, India, Liberia, and Nepal embedded interventions within efforts to expand access to mental health care.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Mental health care is scarce in low-resource settings.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As well as distress from disclosures and testimonies, PWLE reported sometimes feeling the negative impacts of being exposed to stigmatising audiences and co-workers.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Involving PWLE in all levels of anti-stigma programmes
hedgeddirectn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In New Zealand, Canada, and Czechia, anti-stigma programmes were linked to efforts to reform the mental health system.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Mental health care is scarce in low-resource settings.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In RESHAPE in Nepal, for example, PWLE from the national association were less relevant for developing the programme content than those from the local area.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Lessons learned
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Conversely, positive anti-stigma results emerged when the media content focused on representations of recovery, social contact, service user involvement in creating media content, celebrity disclosure, and using social media to generate conversations about mental health.[269][270][271][272]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [269] Calhoun, 2020, “I Feel Like I Know Them”: the positive effect of celebrity self-disclosure of mental illness, Acad Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [270] Hoffner, 2019, Responses to celebrity mental health disclosures: parasocial relations, evaluations, and perceived media influence
- Not checked yetcites [271] Hoffner, 2018, Mental health-related outcomes of Robin Williams' death: the role of parasocial relations and media exposure in stigma, help-seeking, and outreach, Health Commun source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Providing training to PWLE champions well before their involvement in the anti-stigma campaign was reported as an important element to avoid high turnover rates.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Lessons learned
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Compared with earlier systematic reviews, where most of the outcomes were related to news reports by journalists, 265 our review included wider ranges of media types, including social and other online media and stigma-related impacts.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [265] Ross, 2019, A systematic review of the impact of media reports of severe mental illness on stigma and discrimination, and interventions that aim to mitigate any adverse impact, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Having PWLE in leadership roles was noted to be especially powerful.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Involving PWLE in all levels of anti-stigma programmes
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In Germany in 1990, for example, public attitudes worsened following two violent attacks on politicians Oskar Lafontaine and Wolfgang Schäuble by people reported to have schizophrenia.276”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [276] Angermeyer, 1996, The effect of violent attacks by schizophrenic persons on the attitude of the public towards the mentally ill, Soc Sci Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Inclusion of PWLE in the delivery of anti-stigma programmes is crucial for effectiveness and was a key component identified in almost all the selected case studies.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Involving PWLE in all levels of anti-stigma programmes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“We did identify evidence that the media can also serve as a powerful method of communication to increase awareness of mental health and normalise psychiatric illnesses.269”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [269] Calhoun, 2020, “I Feel Like I Know Them”: the positive effect of celebrity self-disclosure of mental illness, Acad Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both in-person and online multimedia approaches have been beneficial, as shown in the Time to Change programme in England and in Like Minds, Like Mine.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The selected case studies are representative of different types of anti-stigma interventions across a wide variety of geographical and cultural locations and with diverse target groups.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of 391 respondents, 181 had been involved in the provision of anti-stigma programmes.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Involving PWLE in all levels of anti-stigma programmes
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the case studies, the need to provide training and structures that supported PWLE was repeatedly emphasised, with particular emphasis on having control over disclosures (eg, in the RESHAPE programme) and enabling safe exits from public events if the audience questions led to discomfort (TTC-Global).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Involving PWLE in all levels of anti-stigma programmes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One study of reporting in India, for example, found that”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Poem 6
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [311] Jang, 2022, Effect of suicide prevention law and media guidelines on copycat suicide of general population following celebrity suicides in South Korea, 2005–2017, Aust N Z J Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The long-term effects of media-based anti-stigma interventions remain unknown because the maximum follow-up has been 2 years.292”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [292] Yamaguchi, 2019, Long-term effects of filmed social contact or internet-based self-study on mental health-related stigma: a 2-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies have been undertaken to examine adherence to guidelines in traditional and new media.284,285”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [284] Ganesh, 2020, The quality of online media reporting of celebrity suicide in India and its association with subsequent online suicide-related search behaviour among general population: an infodemiology study, Asian J Psychiatr source
- Not checked yetcites [285] Sumner, 2020, Adherence to suicide reporting guidelines by news shared on a social networking platform, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“With the exception of a small number of countries, including Canada 286 and Australia, they are rarely adhered to.287”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [286] Creed, 2017, Assessing fidelity to suicide reporting guidelines in Canadian news media: the death of Robin Williams, Can J Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [287] Duncan, 2020, Using the Responsible Suicide Reporting Model to increase adherence to global media reporting guidelines, Journalism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the age of the new media, nonjournalist PWLE have been successfully trained to produce media content that focuses more on recovery and less on crime than professionally produced media content.288”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [288] Carmichael, 2019, Media coverage of mental illness: a comparison of citizen journalism vs professional journalism portrayals, J Ment Health source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Posts about personal experiences of mental health conditions led to more positive attitudes on social media if they had good narrative quality and were endorsed by positive comments.278”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [278] Miles, 2016
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“While we found limited qualitative evidence for the effects of social media on self-stigma, 279”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [279] Francis, 2021, “Twitter is really therapeutic at times”: examination of black men's twitter conversations following hip-hop artist Kid Cudi's depression disclosure, Health Commun source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This effect is more common where suicide is portrayed as a natural or inevitable response to life's challenges in such fictional accounts.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Poem 6
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a study that focused on mental health conditions in adolescents, for example, the authors reported that the relative anonymity afforded by the internet, particularly social media channels, allowed adolescents to search for information and participate in supportive communities.263”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [263] Berry, 2017, #WhyWeTweetMH: understanding why people use Twitter to discuss mental health problems, J Med Internet Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The evidence for the effectiveness of such general guidelines is mixed.212”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [212] Maiorano, 2017, Reducing stigma in media professionals: is there room for improvement? Results from a systematic review, Can J Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Media awards for positive reporting have also been found to be a promising intervention to increase adherence to media guidelines on reporting suicide. 289”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [289] Dare, 2011, Media awards for responsible reporting of suicide: experiences from Australia, Belgium and Denmark, Int J Ment Health Syst source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Exposure of service users to news about the Germanwings aircraft crash, in which the pilot was reported to have had a mental health condition, significantly increased self-stigma.281”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [281] Goepfert, 2019, Effects of stigmatizing media coverage on stigma measures, self-esteem, and affectivity in persons with depression—an experimental controlled trial, BMC Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“we did find evidence that using social media can help people with severe mental health conditions to overcome social isolation.280”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [280] Jakubowska, 2019, Internet use for social interaction by people with psychosis: a systematic review, Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies found that fictional accounts of people with mental health conditions in television programmes and in films can have substantial effects on shaping stigma.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Social-contact-based interventions for media professionals and service users have clear stigmareduction effects.212”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [212] Maiorano, 2017, Reducing stigma in media professionals: is there room for improvement? Results from a systematic review, Can J Psychiatry source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“My government should invest in a long-term national programme to reduce stigma and discrimination 8 (2%) 14 (4%) 45 (12%) 141 (36%) 181 (47%) 3•22 (0•93) 83%”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PWLE should be treated as well as people with physical health conditions 5 (1%) 7 (2%) 16 (4%) 104 (27%) 259 (66%) 3•55 (0•77) 93%”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among all participants, 132 (34%) had experience as activists in research and policy making, had been involved in local community organisations, or both (table 3).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Survey results
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the quantitative results, the most commonly endorsed stigma item was PWLE should be treated as well as people with physical health conditions with 363 (93%) agreeing or strongly agreeing (table 4).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Table 5: Lancet Commission goals, recommendations, targets, and indicators
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stigma and discrimination can be worse than the impact of the mental health condition itself 8 (2%) 29 (8%) 41 (11%) 142 (37%) 169 (43%) 3•12 (1•01) 80%”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The items with the lowest endorsement included overall stigma and discrimination in my country have been reducing over the last decade and PWLE must lead anti-stigma efforts (table 4).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Table 5: Lancet Commission goals, recommendations, targets, and indicators
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the participants also agreed or strongly agreed that stigma and discrimination negatively affect most people with mental health conditions and that the media could play a major role in reducing stigma and discrimination (both 90%).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Table 5: Lancet Commission goals, recommendations, targets, and indicators
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the participants also agreed or strongly agreed that stigma and discrimination negatively affect most people with mental health conditions and that the media could play a major role in reducing stigma and discrimination (both 90%).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Table 5: Lancet Commission goals, recommendations, targets, and indicators
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The items with the lowest endorsement included overall stigma and discrimination in my country have been reducing over the last decade and PWLE must lead anti-stigma efforts (table 4).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Table 5: Lancet Commission goals, recommendations, targets, and indicators
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stigma and discrimination do negatively affect most people with mental health conditions 7 (2%) 11 (3%) 21 (5%) 132 (33%) 219 (56%) 3•40 (0•86) 90%”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
plaindirectn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The media could play a major role in reducing stigma and discrimination 8 (2%) 9 (2%) 21 (5%) 134 (35%) 215 (56%) 3•39 (0•86) 90%”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
hedgedn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“202 (52%) had participated in activities, meetings, or projects to reduce stigma and discrimination related to mental health conditions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Survey results
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and decreasing stigma when they align with guidelines on responsible reporting, for example of suicide”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The media play powerful roles in increasing stigma when they reinforce stereotypes associated with mental health conditions, such as unpredictability or dangerousness, and decreasing stigma when they align with guidelines on responsible reporting, for example of suicide”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for example by reducing access to mental and physical health care and diminishing educational and employment opportunities”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stigma and discrimination contravene basic human rights and have severe, toxic effects on people with mental health conditions that exacerbate marginalisation and social exclusion, for example by reducing access to mental and physical health care and diminishing educational and employment opportunities”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for whom there is double jeopardy: the impact of the primary condition and the severe consequences of stigma.”
- Also stated in: § Aims and scope of the Commission · hedged
“For most such people there is a double jeopardy: the impact of the primary condition itself and the severe consequences of stigma.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Aims and scope of the Commission · hedged
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The findings of this Lancet Commission show that PWLE are key agents for change in stigma reduction and need to be strongly supported to lead or co-lead interventions that use social contact”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
boosteddirectn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for example by reducing access to mental and physical health care and diminishing educational and employment opportunities”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“poorer health care than for physical conditions”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Aims and scope of the Commission
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Evidence is now clear from high-income countries (HICs) and is emerging from LMICs that interventions to reduce stigma and discrimination can be delivered effectively.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Aims and scope of the Commission
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“exists across cultures.1”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Aims and scope of the Commission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Rüsch, 2022
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“is persistent”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Rüsch, 2022
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Stigma powerfully and adversely affects individuals, families, communities, and society, is persistent, and exists across cultures.1”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Aims and scope of the Commission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [1] Rüsch, 2022
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“These cyclical inter-relationships between mental health conditions and poverty are especially pernicious in LMICs.91”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [91] Lund, 2011, Poverty and mental disorders: breaking the cycle in low-income and middle-income countries, Lancet source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The authors concluded that two-stage interventions that first identify people in need and then engage them in the health-care system are necessary to achieve a populationlevel effect on improving children's access to mental health care.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Werlen, 2020, Interventions to improve children's access to mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Offering different types of information (ie, descriptive, explanatory, and directive) also seems to be most effective.122,123”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [122] Birnschein, 2021, Enhancing social interactions for youth with autism spectrum disorder through training programs for typically developing peers: a systematic review, Res Autism Spectr Disord source
- Not checked yetcites [123] Cremin, 2020, Autism awareness interventions for children and adolescents: a scoping review, J Dev Phys Disabil source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Gaiha and colleagues 117 focused on arts interventions (eg, film, theatre, and creative writing) to reduce stigma related to mental health conditions among youth (aged 10-24 years).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Gaiha, 2021, Effectiveness of arts interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma among youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Allowing children to be actively engaged in the intervention and providing them with strategies to interact with peers with mental health conditions seems to be the most promising approach.120,122”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [120] McManus, 2021, A meta-analytic review of interventions to improve children's attitudes toward their peers with intellectual disabilities, Contemp Educ Psychol source
- Not checked yetcites [122] Birnschein, 2021, Enhancing social interactions for youth with autism spectrum disorder through training programs for typically developing peers: a systematic review, Res Autism Spectr Disord source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This finding suggests that for students social contact and practice-based components lead to more positive effects on stigma.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“indicating that biogenic causal models of mental illness may make stigma worse rather than better.223”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [223] Larkings, 2018, Do biogenetic causal beliefs reduce mental illness stigma in people with mental illness and in mental health professionals? A systematic review, Int J Ment Health Nurs source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Large-scale programmes to reduce stigma can vary according to the wider policy context.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Key characteristics of anti-stigma programmes
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PWLE can also help to sustain the programme, for example when champions trained in advocacy continue their work after completion of the pilot initiative via social media and blogs, as in TTC-Global in Kenya.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Lessons learned
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The evidence we gathered suggests that the duration of a specific programme may be less important than the quality of the social contact.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The selected case studies are representative of different types of anti-stigma interventions across a wide variety of geographical and cultural locations and with diverse target groups.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Creating a social movement as part of a coordinated campaign can also provide for more enduring social inclusion of PWLE, and the Like Minds, Like Mine programme in New Zealand adopted this approach.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The selected case studies are representative of different types of anti-stigma interventions across a wide variety of geographical and cultural locations and with diverse target groups.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“During the Time to Change antistigma programme in England, for example, coverage of mental health issues by newspapers has substantially improved.[260][261][262]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Indonesia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [260] Goulden, 2011, Newspaper coverage of mental illness in the UK, 1992-2008, BMC Public Health source
- Not checked yetcites [261] Thornicroft, 2013, Newspaper coverage of mental illness in England 2008–2011, Br J Psychiatry Suppl source
- Not checked yetcites [262] Rhydderch, 2016, Changes in newspaper coverage of mental illness from 2008 to 2014 in England, Acta Psychiatr Scand source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Platforms such as Twitter, for example, can provide a supportive environment for the development of reciprocal relationships in which people can disclose mental health conditions.263”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Indonesia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [263] Berry, 2017, #WhyWeTweetMH: understanding why people use Twitter to discuss mental health problems, J Med Internet Res source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found no previous similar quantitative surveys from which to estimate statistical power and to guide sample size calculations.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We required a minimum sample size of 100 participants because the survey collected quantitative and qualitative data.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
plaindirectn = 100- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“because the evidence base clearly shows that the most effective methods are based on social contact, especially positive social contact, with people with mental health conditions.316”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Panel 4: Guiding principles of the Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [316] Ran, 2022, Knowledge, contact and stigma of mental illness: comparing three stakeholder groups in Hong Kong, Int J Soc Psychiatry source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The detailed evidence synthesis in this report highlights the overwhelming and negative impacts of stigma and discrimination.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Lancet Commission goals and recommendations
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 155
- Probably not a substantial claim. 72
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Psychoeducation was used most often (25 studies) followed by social contact-based interventions (ten studies).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [116] Waqas, 2020, Interventions to reduce stigma related to mental illnesses in educational institutes: a systematic review, Psychiatric Quarterly source
The Results section states that psychoeducation was employed in 25 studies and contact-based interventions were assessed in 10. Its Strategies & Elements of Interventions subsection also describes psychoeducation as a most common strategy. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a global, multilanguage survey of PWLE, 391 people responded from 45 countries and territories.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It is associated with increased self-stigma and reduced empowerment and quality of life.54”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [54] Rüsch, 2014, Emotional reactions to involuntary psychiatric hospitalization and stigma-related stress among people with mental illness, Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among people who anticipated or experienced high levels of discrimination, psychological distress and shame were also increased, and empowerment and quality of life were reduced (personal communication, Petr Winkler).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In terms of diagnoses, self-stigma was highest among people with schizophrenia and, on average, was higher in southeast Asian and Middle Eastern than in European and North American countries.53”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] Dubreucq, 2021, Self-stigma in serious mental illness: a systematic review of frequency, correlates, and consequences, Schizophr Bull source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“consulting closely with the identified target groups”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Self-stigma had particularly negative effects on symptoms and recovery, mediated particularly by reduced self-esteem and increased hopelessness and social isolation.53,68,69”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care and social-care effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] Dubreucq, 2021, Self-stigma in serious mental illness: a systematic review of frequency, correlates, and consequences, Schizophr Bull source
- Not checked yetcites [68] Pellet, 2019, The relationship between self-stigma and depression among people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: a longitudinal study, Psychiatry Res source
- Not checked yetcites [69] Fox, 2018, How and when does mental illness stigma impact treatment seeking? Longitudinal examination of relationships between anticipated and internalized stigma, symptom severity, and mental health service use, Psychiatry Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Regarding legal provisions, striking examples of discriminatory legislation exist in many countries, including prohibitions on marriage, 60 violations against property rights, 61 and prohibition from voting in elections. 62”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Bhugra, 2016, Legislative provisions related to marriage and divorce of persons with mental health problems: a global review, Int Rev Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [61] Bhugra, 2016, Right to property, inheritance, and contract and persons with mental illness, Int Rev Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [62] Bhugra, 2016, Mental illness and the right to vote: a review of legislation across the world, Int Rev Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From the almost 300 respondents in 45 countries (mostly low-income and middle-income countries [LMICs])”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plainn = 300- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“They also reported more self-stigma, more hopelessness, poorer recovery, and reduced quality of life.17,50”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
What the sources say
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“paying attention to the effects, outcomes, and sustainability of the programme”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“aws with provisions for involuntary admission to only for people with mental health conditions are argued to be intrinsically discriminatory.63”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [63] Szmukler, 2020, Involuntary detention and treatment: are we edging toward a “paradigm shift”?, Schizophr Bull source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is strong evidence that stigma is negatively related to help-seeking, especially among people in minority ethnic groups, young people with mental health conditions and those who live with parents with mental health conditions, members of the military, and health professionals, 57 although there is little evidence for people with substance use conditions.58”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [57] Clement, 2015, What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies, Psychol Med source
- Not checked yetcites [58] Hammarlund, 2018, Review of the effects of self-stigma and perceived social stigma on the treatment-seeking decisions of individuals with drug- and alcohol-use disorders, Subst Abuse Rehabil source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Public stigma makes people wish to avoid being labelled.Self-stigma, shame, the 'why try' effect, demoralisation, and giving up of life goals also deter individuals from help-seeking.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Personal impacts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stigma was associated with increases in the number of episodes of being unwell, the duration of condition, and psychiatric hospitalisation.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care and social-care effects
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“carefully creating and adapting the programme content based on context and culture”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“and stigma has an additional adverse impact on them and their relationships with family and peers, and can lead to social exclusion from schools, sports, and other community participation.84”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [84] Ferrie, 2020, Psychosocial outcomes of mental illness stigma in children and adolescents: a mixed-methods systematic review, Child Youth Serv Rev source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Barriers to accessing mental health care include lower insurance benefits than for physical conditions, low rates of reimbursement by insurers to mental health service providers, and restricted insurance coverage for people with mental health conditions, especially in low-income settings.[71][72][73]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care and social-care effects
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [71] Bishop, 2014, Acceptance of insurance by psychiatrists and the implications for access to mental health care, JAMA Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [72] Ghosh, 2021, Mental health insurance in India: lack of parity, Lancet Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [73] Appelbaum, 2020, Holding insurers accountable for parity in coverage of mental health treatment, Psychiatr Serv source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Identified studies investigated the impact of various professional and public initiatives to reduce stigma and discrimination against people with depression in Slovenia, 92 and anti-stigma campaigns in several Asian countries.93”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural stigma Policies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [92] Valic, 2013, A review of the literature and media reports of patterns of mental health stigma and addressing stigma in Slovenia until 2010, Zdr Varst
- Not checked yetcites [93] Zhang, 2019, An integrative model of internalized stigma and recovery-related outcomes among people diagnosed with schizophrenia in rural China, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The included reviews were published between 1994 and 2021, with 58 being published in 2021 and 30 in 2020.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Impact of stigma and discrimination on work and employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“High levels of stigmatisation towards people with mental health conditions can lead to acts of neglect or abuse, such as shackling, verbal and physical humiliation or ridicule, sexual abuse, and violence, 9 which has been reported from south Asia, Africa, North America, and Europe.83”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There is some evidence that after the name change more people received a diagnosis than previously, 94 but none indicating positive effects on public attitudes or media reporting.95”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural stigma Policies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [94] Yamaguchi, 2017, Associations between renaming schizophrenia and stigma-related outcomes: a systematic review, Psychiatry Clin Neurosci source
- Not checked yetcites [95] Corrigan, 2018
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Therefore, people with mental health conditions often conceal their diagnosis, especially if they want to marry, as they might fear that their potential partner could think their children will inherit the mental health condition.81”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Nigeria
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [81] Elkington, 2013, Perceived mental illness stigma, intimate relationships and sexual risk behavior in youth with mental illness, J Adolesc Res source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The search yielded 15 323 entries.After removing 7687 duplicates, 7636 titles or abstracts were screened.Irrelevant studies (n=7249) were excluded, and 387 full texts were assessed for eligibility.A total of 216 reviews were included.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Impact of stigma and discrimination on work and employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several national-level programmes against stigma and discrimination in Asia were effective in reducing experienced and anticipated stigma and facilitated help seeking and engagement with mental health care, although no data were available on whether access to mental health care had increased.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural stigma Policies
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Young people discussed fears of their families not caring about their problems or not taking them seriously, which can invalidate their feelings and decrease their willingness to seek support.86”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [86] 2021
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Benefits and positive outcomes related to reducing structural stigma through policies were reported, but the quality of the studies was generally low.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural stigma Policies
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of those, nine addressed structural stigma, 181 interpersonal stigma, and 26 self-stigma.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Impact of stigma and discrimination on work and employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Four focused on HICs [99][100][101][102] and three had no geographical limitations.[103][104][105]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [99] Joshi, 2021, Women-centered drug treatment models for pregnant women with opioid use disorder: a scoping review, Drug Alcohol Depend source
- Not checked yetcites [100] Røsvik, 2020, Interventions to enhance access to and utilization of formal community care services for home dwelling persons with dementia and their informal carers. A scoping review, Aging Ment Health source
- Not checked yetcites [101] Arundell, 2020, Advancing mental health equality: a mapping review of interventions, economic evaluations and barriers and facilitators, Syst Rev source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A review focusing on children and adolescents, 103 identified 13 studies on universal school-based interventions and 21 studies to engage at-risk individuals.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Werlen, 2020, Interventions to improve children's access to mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A review by Szeto and Dobson 107 reported on training programmes for managers to support staff during episodes of mental ill health and in the provision of accommodations or adjustments to support people returning to work.However, at the time of their review none of the programmes included had undergone evaluation.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [107] Szeto, 2010, Reducing the stigma of mental disorders at work: a review of current workplace anti-stigma intervention programs, Appl Prev Psychol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data for the primary outcome were addressed through assessments of the following approaches: education via lectures, texts, or internet-based programmes; interactive elements, such as group discussions; or social contact with PWLE, either directly or indirectly, via videos or the internet.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Formal quality assessment of constituent studies was done in four reviews.[102][103][104][105] Two studies included meta-analyses.102,104”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] Choi, 2018, Intervention models for increasing access to behavioral health services among youth: a systematic review, J Dev Behav Pediatr source
- Not checked yetcites [103] Werlen, 2020, Interventions to improve children's access to mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci source
- Not checked yetcites [104] Greene, 2016, Interventions to increase retention in mental health services: a systematic review, Psychiatr Serv source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Descriptive studies have been done that have, for example, reviewed mental health parity with health policies in Commonwealth countries 96 or legislative mechanisms for social participation rights of people with depression in the Asia-Pacific region.97”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Structural stigma Policies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [96] Bhugra, 2018, A review of mental health policies from Commonwealth countries, Int J Soc Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [97] Ricci, 2004, A review of the legislative mechanisms available to protect the social participation rights of people with depression in the Asia Pacific region, Australas Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At the same time, help-seeking intentions improved in two of nine studies (effect size -0•15 to 0•30) as did accessing care in one of five studies.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [103] Werlen, 2020, Interventions to improve children's access to mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We found three reviews of ten studies synthesising evidence on interventions aimed at increasing access to work by reducing stigma at the structural level, but only one included an evaluation of data by meta-analysis.106”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [106] Gayed, 2018, Effectiveness of training workplace managers to understand and support the mental health needs of employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Occup Environ Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Three reports focused on any mental health condition, 102,104,105 two on children and adolescents, 102,105 one on people with dementia or suspected dementia, 101 and one on pregnant women using opioids.99,104”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] Choi, 2018, Intervention models for increasing access to behavioral health services among youth: a systematic review, J Dev Behav Pediatr source
- Not checked yetcites [104] Greene, 2016, Interventions to increase retention in mental health services: a systematic review, Psychiatr Serv source
- Not checked yetcites [105] Xu, 2018, Effectiveness of interventions to promote help-seeking for mental health problems: systematic review and meta-analysis, Psychol Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They found that employing the following strategies contributed to improved access to care: increasing inclusivity in programmes for individuals with various learning disabilities”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [101] Arundell, 2020, Advancing mental health equality: a mapping review of interventions, economic evaluations and barriers and facilitators, Syst Rev source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interventions, most of which targeted children, adolescents, or youth, were aimed at reducing negative attitudes, social distance, or peer victimisation or enhancing social inclusion of peers affected by mental health conditions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most studies targeted mental health conditions in general or suicide.A smaller number of studies exclusively covered autism (n=3), developmental or intellectual disabilities (n=4), or specific conditions, such as addiction (n=1) or schizophrenia (n=1).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plainn = 4- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The review identified 97 original studies, of which three were in middle-income countries and none in low-income countries.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] Xu, 2018, Effectiveness of interventions to promote help-seeking for mental health problems: systematic review and meta-analysis, Psychol Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Some of these studies applied psychoeducational or cognitive-behavioural strategies to enhance motivation to seek help.The results showed positive short-term effects on attitudes, intentions, and behaviours and positive longterm effects on help-seeking behaviour.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [105] Xu, 2018, Effectiveness of interventions to promote help-seeking for mental health problems: systematic review and meta-analysis, Psychol Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Rosvik and colleagues 100 concluded that addressing lack of awareness about services improved the uptake of community-based and social welfare services among people with dementia and their caregivers, but that there was a gap in knowledge about which interventions had the greatest impact.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [100] Røsvik, 2020, Interventions to enhance access to and utilization of formal community care services for home dwelling persons with dementia and their informal carers. A scoping review, Aging Ment Health source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, no studies measured structural stigma in the workplace, and all outcomes were measured at the individual level.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Altogether seven reviews were identified.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“All the interventions in that review focused on how to respond to employees' mental health needs, and some also covered job stress and workplace promotion of mental health.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [106] Gayed, 2018, Effectiveness of training workplace managers to understand and support the mental health needs of employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Occup Environ Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They concluded that, although there is evidence that discussions between older adolescents and nurses or counsellors can be effective in increasing their access to care, for younger children it was essential also to educate the parents.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] Choi, 2018, Intervention models for increasing access to behavioral health services among youth: a systematic review, J Dev Behav Pediatr source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The number of studies included in each systematic review varied from 11 to 128.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to care
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though there are some promising results regarding behavioural outcomes, most original studies focused on knowledge and attitudes.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Stigma was directly targeted in 25 studies, of which 19 showed significant improvements.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Waqas, 2020, Interventions to reduce stigma related to mental illnesses in educational institutes: a systematic review, Psychiatric Quarterly source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For teachers, Torok and colleagues 126 found that none of the included studies reported specific effects for measures of attitudes towards suicide, but one study found that parental attitudes improved between the first and the second assessment (d=0•21), although the effect was not maintained 2 months later.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [126] Torok, 2019, Preventing adolescent suicide: a systematic review of the effectiveness and change mechanisms of suicide prevention gatekeeping training programs for teachers and parents, J Adolesc source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Eight systematic reviews with stigma as the primary outcome focused on young people with developmental disabilities, such as intellectual disabilities or autism spectrum disorders, and one concluded that the original studies with the highest methodological quality were also more likely to show efficacy.118”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] Morris, 2021, Classroom-based peer interventions targeting autism ignorance, prejudice and/or discrimination: a systematic PRISMA review, Int J Incl Educ
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“57 studies were identified (quantitative and qualitative), eight of which were randomised controlled trials.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Gaiha, 2021, Effectiveness of arts interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma among youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The overall quality of these studies was quite low, with 35 (80%) showing a high risk of bias.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Waqas, 2020, Interventions to reduce stigma related to mental illnesses in educational institutes: a systematic review, Psychiatric Quarterly source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The findings indicated that universal interventions were effective in changing attitudes, although the effect size was small (d=0•05-0•40) and changes were not sustained.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [124] Breet, 2021, Systematic review and narrative synthesis of suicide prevention in high-schools and universities: a research agenda for evidence-based practice, BMC Public Health source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Positive attitudes towards mental health conditions and confidence in providing support were identified as important outcomes.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Most of the included trials had been conducted in HICs, with only six studies having been done in MICs including China (n=2), Russia (n=2), Nigeria (n=1), and Brazil (n=1).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Waqas, 2020, Interventions to reduce stigma related to mental illnesses in educational institutes: a systematic review, Psychiatric Quarterly source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The study quality ranged from low to moderate, with some studies reported as being methodologically strong.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Gaiha, 2021, Effectiveness of arts interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma among youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An electronic bridging mental health service, which included personalised feedback and online counselling, significantly decreased personal stigma scores with a large effect (d=-1•07) and reduced public stigma among high-risk college students with a medium effect (d=-0•59).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All 25 reviews had been published since 2012, and ten were published in 2021.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Two reviews concluded that findings for intended behaviour were variable and concluded how far children's actual behaviour can be predicted from selfreported behavioural intentions was unclear.118,123”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] Morris, 2021, Classroom-based peer interventions targeting autism ignorance, prejudice and/or discrimination: a systematic PRISMA review, Int J Incl Educ
- Not checked yetcites [123] Cremin, 2020, Autism awareness interventions for children and adolescents: a scoping review, J Dev Phys Disabil source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Mellor 115 came to a similar conclusion and noted the lack of follow-up data in 17 studies, meaning that sustained effects of anti-stigma interventions could not be assessed.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [115] Mellor, 2014, School-based interventions targeting stigma of mental illness: systematic review, Psychiatr Bull (2014) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most of the studies on interpersonal stigma among children, adolescents, and youth were done in school settings, but one review identified several community interventions aimed at enhancing social inclusion, such as PhotoVoice, dog-walking, peer support, and participation in sports competitions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For interventions that focused specifically on stigma, results showed that psychoeducation and interpersonal contact significantly reduced stigma, which was sustained at 1-month follow-up (d=0”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [124] Breet, 2021, Systematic review and narrative synthesis of suicide prevention in high-schools and universities: a research agenda for evidence-based practice, BMC Public Health source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They identified 44 studies, of which 36 (82%) had been published since 2009.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Waqas, 2020, Interventions to reduce stigma related to mental illnesses in educational institutes: a systematic review, Psychiatric Quarterly source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Only two randomised controlled trials were considered appropriate for inclusion and neither reported significant effects.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [114] Schachter, 2008, Effects of school-based interventions on mental health stigmatization: a systematic review, Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A comprehensive systematic review of school-based interventions on mental health stigmatisation was carried out by Schachter and colleagues.114 They identified 43 original studies, but none was of sufficient quality to produce reliable and valid data.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [114] Schachter, 2008, Effects of school-based interventions on mental health stigmatization: a systematic review, Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Overall, the results indicated positive effects and a meta-analysis showed that arts interventions are generally effective when using multiple art forms, although the effects were small.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Gaiha, 2021, Effectiveness of arts interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma among youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Psychiatry source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Three of these five involved university students and specifically measured attitudes, beliefs, norms, and stigma regarding mental health.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [129] Reis, 2022, The impact of mental health literacy training programs on the mental health literacy of university students: a systematic review, Prev Sci source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Among adolescents, three of four studies that measured stigmatising attitudes found a significant reduction after training, but results were inconsistent at the item level.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [128] Ng, 2021, A systematic review of youth and teen mental health first aid: improving adolescent mental health, J Adolesc Health source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The stigma reduction strategy most often applied was community education, followed by individual empowerment of PWLE and social contact within the community.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [133] Hartog, 2020, Stigma reduction interventions for children and adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review of intervention strategies, Soc Sci Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A metaanalysis of uncontrolled before-and-after evaluation studies in the Opening Minds programme in Canada found that interventions including social contact in the form of personal testimony were effective and that including multiple social contact components improved outcomes for health workers compared with interventions that had only one component of social contact”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [152] Knaak, 2014, Key ingredients of anti-stigma programs for health care providers: a data synthesis of evaluative studies, Can J Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A gatekeeper training intervention for family and friends of people at risk of suicide led to positive effects on knowledge, self-efficacy, and gatekeeper-related skills, but the results for stigma and attitudes were inconsistent.134”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Family members
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [134] Morton, 2021, Gatekeeper training for friends and family of individuals at risk of suicide: a systematic review, J Community Psychol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Two reviews focused on e-interventions for professionals, and both reported improved knowledge and attitudes, more humane treatment of service users, and reductions in the use of coercive methods.155,156”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [155] Muirhead, 2021, Establishing the effectiveness of technology-enabled dementia education for health and social care practitioners: a systematic review, Syst Rev source
- Not checked yetcites [156] Zubala, 2019, Large-scale online education programmes and their potential to effect change in behaviour and practice of health and social care professionals: a rapid systematic review, Interact Learn Environ source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“29 addressed mental health conditions generally, ten exclusively involved people with dementia, seven assessed substance use disorders, five personality disorders, three borderline personality disorder, four suicidality and self-harm, one intellectual disabilities, one neurodevelopmental disorder, one psychosis, and one eating disorders”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Barber, 2019, Microaggressions towards people affected by mental health problems: a scoping review, Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A meta-analysis showed a small to medium effect size for learners' attitudes and a large effect size for clinical skills at immediate follow-up after simulation interventions that was sustained 3 months later.147”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [147] Piot, 2020, Simulation in psychiatry for medical doctors: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Med Educ source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Two other reviews concluded that psychoeducation potentially enables caregivers to cope better with family members' mental health conditions and to reduce stigma.138,139”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Family members
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [138] Monnapula-Mazabane, 2021, Mental health stigma experiences among caregivers and service users in South Africa: a qualitative investigation, Curr Psychol
- Not checked yetcites [139] Soo, 2018, Randomized controlled trials of psychoeducation modalities in the management of bipolar disorder: a systematic review, J Clin Psychiatry source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Five meta-analyses reported small to medium effect sizes in improved attitudes and medium to large effect sizes in knowledge and clinical skills.[144][145][146][147][148]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [144][145][146][147][148]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The stigma-related outcomes reported included changes in knowledge, attitudes, and clinical skills as well as clinical confidence and self-efficacy.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“All three studies reported some positive impacts of mental health literacy training on these constructs, but the evidence was weak.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [129] Reis, 2022, The impact of mental health literacy training programs on the mental health literacy of university students: a systematic review, Prev Sci source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For youth, six studies measured stigmatising attitudes, four of which reported significant effects, again with inconsistent results at the item level.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [128] Ng, 2021, A systematic review of youth and teen mental health first aid: improving adolescent mental health, J Adolesc Health source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Riebschleger and colleagues 136 showed that psychoeducation led to decreased mental health stigma and improved family communication about parental mental health conditions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Family members
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [136] Riebschleger, 2017, Mental health literacy content for children of parents with a mental illness: thematic analysis of a literature review, Brain Sci source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Borschmann and colleagues 169 evaluated national antistigma campaigns in 21 European countries but found little evidence of a significant reduction in general stigma and showed variations across different sub-populations.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [169] Borschmann, 2014, Campaigns to reduce mental illness stigma in Europe: a scoping review, Die Psychiatrie Grundlagen & Perspektiven source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Their review, which included 43 studies, showed that public awareness and information programmes about suicide or depression improved knowledge and, with only two exceptions, attitudes.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [170] Dumesnil, 2009, Public awareness campaigns about depression and suicide: a review, Psychiatr Serv source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One found evidence on reduced discrimination, but this finding was not replicated in two similar larger studies.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [171] Clement, 2013, Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They found that only 20% of studies had addressed cultural adaptation and concluded that a more careful cultural adaptation of anti-stigma interventions is required in future.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [178] Mascayano, 2020, Including culture in programs to reduce stigma toward people with mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries, Transcult Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Costeffectiveness is a research gap 150,164,167 and more metaanalyses are needed.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [150] Brunero, 2012, Mental health education programmes for generalist health professionals: an integrative review, Int J Ment Health Nurs source
- Not checked yetcites [164] Keynejad, 2021, WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: updated systematic review on evidence and impact, Evid Based Ment Health source
- Not checked yetcites [167] Gkioka, 2020, Evaluation and effectiveness of dementia staff training programs in general hospital settings: a narrative synthesis with Holton's three-level model applied, J Alzheimers Dis source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They could find no strong evidence that using biological attributions for the cause of mental health conditions improved mental health literacy or reduced prejudice.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [177] Xu, 2017, Challenging mental health related stigma in China: systematic review and meta-analysis. Interventions among the general public, Psychiatry Res source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For social contact, the respective effect sizes were d=0•4, d=-0•06 (nonsignificant), and d=0•19, respectively.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [168] Corrigan, 2012, Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: a meta-analysis of outcome studies, Psychiatr Serv source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The use of mainstream recreational facilities showed that activities that foster social connections (eg, physical or creative activities, such as theatre, choir, or arts) increased self-esteem and self-confidence in people with PWLE and gave them a sense of accomplishment.176”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [176] Fenton, 2017, The benefits of recreation for the recovery and social inclusion of individuals with mental illness: an integrative review, Leis Sci source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They showed a small and significant effect on the reduction of negative stereotypes and found that interventions which included social contact were more effective than those that did not.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [177] Xu, 2017, Challenging mental health related stigma in China: systematic review and meta-analysis. Interventions among the general public, Psychiatry Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Most studies focused on immediate outcomes, such as measures of attitudes assessed directly after the intervention, although only a few were considered to have low risk of bias.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [171] Clement, 2013, Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The clearest pattern of evidence emerged for first-person narratives of PWLE, which were related to reduced prejudice.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [171] Clement, 2013, Mass media interventions for reducing mental health-related stigma, Cochrane Database Syst Rev
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Improvements were modest and most often only measured in the short term.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [170] Dumesnil, 2009, Public awareness campaigns about depression and suicide: a review, Psychiatr Serv source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Contact and education both improved attitudes and behavioural intentions towards stigma, but contact resulted in significantly greater positive changes among adults.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [168] Corrigan, 2012, Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: a meta-analysis of outcome studies, Psychiatr Serv source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The authors noted the feasibility of largescale projects based on partnership between non-profit organisations, churches, community mental health centres, and other organisations.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [172] Rivera, 2021, A narrative review of mental illness stigma reduction interventions among african americans in the United States, J Ment Health Clin Psychol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“A different review that assessed undergraduate nursing students reported that empathy for people who misuse alcohol and drugs improved after exposure to narratives of students' personal experiences and PWLE and reflective sessions, but did not improve with simulations.158”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [158] Smyth, 2021, Undergraduate nursing student knowledge and attitudes of healthcare consumers with problematic alcohol and other drug use: a scoping review, Int J Ment Health Nurs source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They highlighted the importance of collaboration between mental health providers and faith-based institutions, as there is much mistrust of the medical sector.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [172] Rivera, 2021, A narrative review of mental illness stigma reduction interventions among african americans in the United States, J Ment Health Clin Psychol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The importance of intergenerational social contact was echoed in a scoping review by Gerritzen and colleagues. 175”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [175] Gerritzen, 2020, Successful elements of intergenerational dementia programs: a scoping review, J Intergenerational Relationships source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Few such studies were conducted in LMICs, but among those that were, China was the most frequently represented.145,147,[160][161][162][163][164][165]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Health-care professionals and students
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [145] Lien, 2021, Challenging mental illness stigma in healthcare professionals and students: a systematic review and network meta-analysis, Psychol Health source
- Not checked yetcites [147] Piot, 2020, Simulation in psychiatry for medical doctors: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Med Educ source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For education, the meta-analysis effect sizes were d=0•3 for attitudes, d=0•14 for affect, and d=0•25 for behavioural intentions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [168] Corrigan, 2012, Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: a meta-analysis of outcome studies, Psychiatr Serv source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Social contact was also associated with more social interaction, reduced fear, 98 and reduced experience of discrimination.206”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [98] Zhang, 2019, Overview of stigma against psychiatric illnesses and advancements of anti-stigma activities in six Asian societies, Int J Environ Res Public Health source
- Not checked yetcites [206] Schreiber, 2015, Stigma, American military personnel and mental health care: challenges from Iraq and Afghanistan, J Ment Health source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Most of these reviews found the activities efficacious across multiple formats, [182][183][184][185][186][187][188] but one review reported no difference between the intervention group and the comparison.189”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Awareness creation, education, and training interventions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [182][183][184][185][186][187][188]
- Not checked yetcites [189] Han, 2020, Interventions for attitudes and empathy toward people with dementia and positive aspects of caregiving: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Res Aging source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although simulated hallucinations increased empathy for people with schizophrenia, the evidence for their effectiveness in causing attitude change is inconsistent, with some studies indicating that they may worsen rather than improve attitudes and desire for social distance.198”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Simulated symptoms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [198] Morgan, 2018, Interventions to reduce stigma towards people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis, J Psychiatr Res source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Active interaction with PWLE who described their experiences was more effective than passive interaction in reducing stigma and led to greater reductions among health-care professionals than among non-professionals.201”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [201] Ren, 2020, Meta-analysis of the effect of mental health literacy intervention in Chinese people, Acta Psychol Sin source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Social contact through theatre or film improved knowledge and attitudes towards people with mental health conditions, addressed misconceptions, 178,[194][195][196][197] and led to some sustainable behavioural changes.194,195”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [178] Mascayano, 2020, Including culture in programs to reduce stigma toward people with mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries, Transcult Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [194][195][196][197]
- Not checked yetcites [194] Dalky, 2012, Mental illness stigma reduction interventions: review of intervention trials, West J Nurs Res source
- Not checked yetcites [195] Doley, 2017, Interventions to reduce the stigma of eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Eat Disord source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At the population level, reasonably consistent benefits were seen with social contact interventions in relation to attitude change and weaker evidence suggested knowledge improvement, although most studies only assessed short-term outcomes, including in specific target groups.210”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [210] Thornicroft, 2016, Evidence for effective interventions to reduce mental-health-related stigma and discrimination, Lancet source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Video-based contact combined with education was effective in reducing stigma among students in general and among health professionals, 198,199,[209][210][211] and led to a more balanced portrayal of people with mental health problems by media professionals.212”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [198] Morgan, 2018, Interventions to reduce stigma towards people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis, J Psychiatr Res source
- Not checked yetcites [199] Morgan, 2021, Review of Australian initiatives to reduce stigma towards people with complex mental illness: what exists and what works?, Int J Ment Health Syst source
- Not checked yetcites [209][210][211]
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Gatekeeper training improved knowledge about suicide and suicide prevention and reduced belief in myths about suicide immediately after the training intervention in a range of groups, such as students, teachers, social workers, pharmacists, managers, and carers, but these effects were not sustained.193”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [193] Holmes, 2021, The long-term efficacy of suicide prevention gatekeeper training: a systematic review, Arch Suicide Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, one review found that although internet-based interventions led to improved literacy and to reduced stigma in adults, stigma among high school students was not affected.191”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Awareness creation, education, and training interventions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [191] Griffiths, 2007, Internet-based mental health programs: a powerful tool in the rural medical kit, Aust J Rural Health source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One review reported that promoting continuum beliefs about mental health-that is, a continuum between mental health and mental health conditions (rather than a dichotomous approach)-gave mixed results for stigma and even found increased stigma in some studies.216”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Trinidad and Tobago
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [216] Peter, 2021, Continuum beliefs and mental illness stigma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of correlation and intervention studies, Psychol Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Findings were mixed for specific stigma outcomes, with some studies showing reduced stigma toward mental health treatments, beliefs about dangerousness, and social distance, whereas others reported no reduction in stigma towards people who take antidepressants.215”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Trinidad and Tobago
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [215] Pérez-Flores, 2021, Effectiveness of mental health literacy and stigma interventions for Latino/a adults in the United States: a systematic review, Stigma Health source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is considerable debate on how far educational interventions lead to behaviour change.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“13 reviews assessed interventions related to advocacy, campaigns, and protest, including from seven to 123 original studies.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Simulated symptoms
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The potential for a wide range of recoveryoriented interventions to reduce self-stigma was also made by Winsper and colleagues, 226 but they found that recovery is rarely measured.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [226] Winsper, 2020, How do recovery-oriented interventions contribute to personal mental health recovery? A systematic review and logic model, Clin Psychol Rev source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A review on selfstigma in relation to people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, 221 reported that the most methodologically robust study they included showed the largest effect for internalised stigma reduction.225”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [221] Wood, 2016, Psychosocial interventions for internalised stigma in people with a schizophrenia-spectrum diagnosis: a systematic narrative synthesis and meta-analysis, Schizophr Res source
- Not checked yetcites [225] Morrison, 2016, Cognitive therapy for internalised stigma in people experiencing psychosis: a pilot randomised controlled trial, Psychiatry Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The number of studies assessed in each review ranged from five to 123, and these studies were conducted in HICs and LMICs, and conditions of interest were severe mental health conditions, 179 suicide, 217 or mental health conditions in general.98,140”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [179] Nguyen, 2019, Informal mental health interventions for people with severe mental illness in low and lower middle-income countries: a systematic review of effectiveness, Int J Soc Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [217] Takada, 2010, Characteristics and effects of suicide prevention programs: comparison between workplace and other settings, Ind Health source
- Not checked yetcites [98] Zhang, 2019, Overview of stigma against psychiatric illnesses and advancements of anti-stigma activities in six Asian societies, Int J Environ Res Public Health source
- Not checked yetcites [140] Adu, 2021, Policies and interventions to reduce familial mental illness stigma: a scoping review of empirical literature, Issues Mental Health Nurs source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In meta-analyses short-term follow-up showed sustained moderate improvements, 218 but two reviews found that the improvements became non-significant over time.221,224”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [218] Rüsch, 2021, Honest, Open, Proud to support disclosure decisions and to decrease stigma's impact among people with mental illness: conceptual review and meta-analysis of program efficacy, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol source
- Not checked yetcites [221] Wood, 2016, Psychosocial interventions for internalised stigma in people with a schizophrenia-spectrum diagnosis: a systematic narrative synthesis and meta-analysis, Schizophr Res source
- Not checked yetcites [224] Büchter, 2017, Interventions for reducing self-stigma in people with mental illnesses: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, Ger Med Sci
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ten assessed interventions specifically designed to address self-stigma and 16 considered interventions targeting other primary outcomes but included self-stigma or other closely related measures.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“26 reviews were included on interventions for self-stigma and, notably, all were published between 2012 and 2021 (appendix 3 pp 107-108).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Both reviews found positive effects of psychoeducation on reduced self-stigma and selfprejudice, and improved coping with stigma.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [236] Xu, 2017, Challenging mental health related stigma in China: systematic review and meta-analysis. I. Interventions among people with mental illness, Psychiatry Res source
- Not checked yetcites [227] Demissie, 2018, Psychological interventions for bipolar disorder in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review, BJPsych Open source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Aguirre Velasco and colleagues 230 summarised largely school-based interventions for adolescents, and found some improvements in help-seeking intentions, stigma related to help-seeking, or both, although study quality was low.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [230] Aguirre Velasco, 2020, What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review, BMC Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These reviews questioned whether the outcome measures used in studies were sufficiently responsive to change 224 and addressed traditional characteristics such as validity and reliability.221”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [224] Büchter, 2017, Interventions for reducing self-stigma in people with mental illnesses: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, Ger Med Sci
- Not checked yetcites [221] Wood, 2016, Psychosocial interventions for internalised stigma in people with a schizophrenia-spectrum diagnosis: a systematic narrative synthesis and meta-analysis, Schizophr Res source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Another review by Ashton and colleagues 214 found that protest interventions reduced stigma in the short term, but the long-term effects were unclear.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Trinidad and Tobago
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [214] Ashton, 2018, Key ingredients-target groups, methods and messages, and evaluation-of local-level, public interventions to counter stigma and discrimination: a lived experience informed selective narrative literature review, Community Ment Health J source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Protest interventions might reduce stigma in the short term but the long-term impact is unclear.214”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Trinidad and Tobago
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [214] Ashton, 2018, Key ingredients-target groups, methods and messages, and evaluation-of local-level, public interventions to counter stigma and discrimination: a lived experience informed selective narrative literature review, Community Ment Health J source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Disclosure about family members' mental health conditions increased, which was associated with improvements in knowledge of schizophrenia and social inclusion.179”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [179] Nguyen, 2019, Informal mental health interventions for people with severe mental illness in low and lower middle-income countries: a systematic review of effectiveness, Int J Soc Psychiatry source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“placed on the need for PWLE to be involved at every stage of anti-stigma programmes and not just to provide testimonies.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Involving PWLE in all levels of anti-stigma programmes
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most research has focused on the traditional media, but evidence is growing on the influences of newer media platforms.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Stigma and the media
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The importance of training, feedback, peer support, and remuneration were all emphasised.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Involving PWLE in all levels of anti-stigma programmes
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The RESHAPE programme in Nepal, TTC-Global, and other programmes had training packages prepared by PWLE for advocacy and social contact interventions and incorporated specific measures to facilitate peer-to-peer support.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Lessons learned
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some of the most powerful ways that the media perpetuate stigma worldwide are by using stigmatising language and by simplistically or inaccurately linking mental health conditions with violence.266,267”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [266] Niederkrotenthaler, 2014, Increasing help-seeking and referrals for individuals at risk for suicide by decreasing stigma: the role of mass media, Am J Prev Med source
- Not checked yetcites [267] Brandt Sørensen, 2021, A qualitative analysis of self-harm and suicide in Sri Lankan printed newspapers, Crisis source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The quantity of mental-health-related content on social media has increased markedly in the past decade, leading to a mixed picture.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, terms such as psychosis are often used negatively or as an insult but medical information about the mental health conditions, including sources of help, that is often factually correct is also present and can help to increase public knowledge.277”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [277] Alvarez-Mon, 2019, Areas of interest and stigmatic attitudes of the general public in five relevant medical conditions: thematic and quantitative analysis using Twitter, J Med Internet Res source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Negative reports that focused on danger or which irresponsibly reported on suicide led to more stigmatising attitudes 273,274 and a reduction in willingness to disclose one's own mental health difficulties.199,275”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [273] Corrigan, 2013, The effects of news stories on the stigma of mental illness, J Nerv Ment Dis source
- Not checked yetcites [274] Reavley, 2016, Beliefs about dangerousness of people with mental health problems: the role of media reports and personal exposure to threat or harm, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol source
- Not checked yetcites [199] Morgan, 2021, Review of Australian initiatives to reduce stigma towards people with complex mental illness: what exists and what works?, Int J Ment Health Syst source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To ensure relevance and relatability, the case studies and PWLE experience survey emphasised the importance of including members of the target groups in the programme design and delivery to maximise precise selection of stakeholders.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Lessons learned
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The selected case studies are representative of different types of anti-stigma interventions across a wide variety of geographical and cultural locations and with diverse target groups.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, the emotional labour of social contact was thought to increase turnover of staff in one of the programmes assessed.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Involving PWLE in all levels of anti-stigma programmes
hedgedconditionalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Others have included scales more specific to the target groups, such as the Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes Scale.252,253”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [252] Gabbidon, 2013, Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes (MICA) scale-psychometric properties of a version for healthcare students and professionals, Psychiatry Res source
- Not checked yetcites [253] Li, 2014, Levels of stigma among community mental health staff in Guangzhou, China, BMC Psychiatry source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Respondents to our survey indicated that involvement in anti-stigma programmes could not only reduce self-stigma but also be an important contribution to an individual's recovery journey.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Involving PWLE in all levels of anti-stigma programmes
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of these studies measured attitudes but mentalhealth-related knowledge was not well assessed and very few measured changes in behaviour.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In relation to suicide, the media play a major role in influencing stigmatising knowledge (ignorance) and attitudes (prejudice), and can perpetuate stigma through irresponsible portrayals of individuals who have self-harmed or died by suicide or reduce stigma through by disseminating helpful information or mobilising campaigns to improve public opinion and attitudes.303,304”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [303] Oquendo, 2020, Barriers for the research, prevention, and treatment of suicidal behavior, Curr Top Behav Neurosci source
- Not checked yetcites [304] Côté, 2021, Suicide-related Twitter content in response to a national mental health awareness campaign and the association between the campaign and suicide rates in Ontario, Can J Psychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“he media can also be used as channels for interventions to reduce stigma among the general public, and media messaging is most effective when using social-contact methods.[290][291][292][293][294]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [290] Yuen, 2021, The effects of immersive virtual reality in reducing public stigma of mental illness in the university population of Hong Kong: randomized controlled trial, J Med Internet Res source
- Not checked yetcites [291] Brown, 2020, The effectiveness of two potential mass media interventions on stigma: video-recorded social contact and audio/visual simulations, Community Ment Health J source
- Not checked yetcites [292] Yamaguchi, 2019, Long-term effects of filmed social contact or internet-based self-study on mental health-related stigma: a 2-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Social contact interventions were applied in several studies using video content with service users, 291,292 virtual reality simulation, or social media profiles, 294 and helped to engage and inform the public and to reduce stigma.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [291] Brown, 2020, The effectiveness of two potential mass media interventions on stigma: video-recorded social contact and audio/visual simulations, Community Ment Health J source
- Not checked yetcites [292] Yamaguchi, 2019, Long-term effects of filmed social contact or internet-based self-study on mental health-related stigma: a 2-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial, Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol source
- Not checked yetcites [294] Neubaum, 2020, Digital destigmatization: how exposure to networking profiles can reduce social stereotypes, Comput Human Behav source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A multimedia selfstigma reduction campaign showed that campaign exposure was associated with positive recovery beliefs, and greater use of mental health care.282”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [282] Collins, 2019, Social marketing of mental health treatment: California's mental illness stigma reduction campaign, Am J Public Health source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Poorly considered media reports that portray suicide in this way can result in a contagion effect and have been associated with the Werther effect, in which suicide attempts may mimic other such attempts, such as following high-profile celebrity suicides or popular fictional portrayals of suicide.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Poem 6
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The series received both praise and critique, as it powerfully reduced stigma, especially among those with no personal experience relating to suicide but also led to contagion of suicidality when media guidelines on suicide reporting and portrayal were not followed.[307][308][309][310]”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Poem 6
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [307] Rosa, 2019, Thirteen Reasons Why: the impact of suicide portrayal on adolescents' mental health, J Psychiatr Res source
- Not checked yetcites [308] Mueller, 2019, Why Thirteen Reasons Why may elicit suicidal ideation in some viewers, but help others, Soc Sci Med source
- Not checked yetcites [309] D'Agati, 2021, Thirteen Reasons Why revisited: a monograph for teens, parents, and mental health professionals, J Med Humanit source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“To prevent such copycat suicides, the South Korean Government enacted a suicide prevention law in 2012 and revised their media guidelines for suicide reporting.A study found that these regulatory measures were associated with a substantial reduction in deaths by suicide.306”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Poem 6
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [306] Chesin, 2020, Knowledge of suicide risk factors, but not suicide ideation severity, is greater among college students who viewed 13 Reasons Why, J Am Coll Health source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Stereotypical (negative) portrayals of people with mental health conditions increased stigma, 297,298 whereas positive portrayals improved knowledge and attitudes.299,300”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [297] Quintero Johnson, 2018, “He acted like a crazy person”: exploring the influence of college students' recall of stereotypic media representations of mental illness, Psychol Pop Media Cult source
- Not checked yetcites [298] Scarf, 2020, Association of viewing the films Joker or Terminator: Dark Fate with prejudice toward individuals with mental illness, JAMA Netw Open source
- Not checked yetcites [299] Stern, 2019, Brief report: does watching the good doctor affect knowledge of and attitudes toward autism?, J Autism Dev Disord source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The media is a major factor in making stigma and discrimination worse 7 (2%) 41 (11%) 66 (17%) 136 (35%) 140 (36%) 2•93 (1•05) 71%”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
plaindirectn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“254 (65%) respondents come from upper-middle -income countries and territories.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Survey results
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall stigma and discrimination in my country have been reducing over the last decade 29 (8%) 66 (17%) 114 (29%) 134 (34%) 46 (12%) 2•26 (1•10) 46%”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PWLE must lead anti-stigma efforts 18 (5%) 76 (20%) 112 (29%) 128 (33%) 56 (14%) 2•33 (1•09) 47%”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“391 participants responded to the survey from 45 countries and territories:”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Survey results
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The invitations to participate were extended only to PWLE, yet 69 (18%) did not disclose that they that they had a mental health condition experience, although respondents could reply that they were mental health activists without such experience.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Survey results
plainn = 391- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stigma and discrimination contravene basic human rights and have severe, toxic effects on people with mental health conditions that exacerbate marginalisation and social exclusion, for example by reducing access to mental and physical health care and diminishing educational and employment opportunities”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“need to be strongly supported to lead or co-lead interventions that use social contact”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“loss of property, inheritance, or rights to vote”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“social exclusion in relation to education, the workplace, and the community”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These pernicious barriers to full citizenship and social participation all share one fundamental characteristic: they contravene basic human rights that are intended to apply equally to all of us (appendix 3 p 16).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Aims and scope of the Commission
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stigma and discrimination have many manifestations, ranging from damage to marital prospects; social exclusion in relation to education, the workplace, and the community; loss of property, inheritance, or rights to vote; and poorer health care than for physical conditions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Aims and scope of the Commission
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The stigmatisation of people with mental health conditions is very common and is seen worldwide.12”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Concepts and terms used to describe reactions to people with mental health conditions
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Thornicroft, 2006
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The umbrella review was registered with Prospero, registration number CRD42022299682.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Impact of stigma and discrimination on work and employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This is especially important given that one in every seven adolescents aged 10-19 years experiences a mental health condition, 85”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [85] Salazar de Pablo, 2020, Universal and selective interventions to promote good mental health in young people: systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur Neuropsychopharmacol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Difficulties in finding or retaining employment due to unsympathetic employers or co-workers can limit the availability of skilled employees on the labour market and reduce the potential for economic growth.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Botswana
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This weighting towards recent years reflects increasing research interest in the topic.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Impact of stigma and discrimination on work and employment
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, there is the potential for vocational workers to collaborate with employers and elicit change at the structural level.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Waqas and colleagues 116 conducted a systematic review of anti-stigma interventions in educational institutions.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Waqas, 2020, Interventions to reduce stigma related to mental illnesses in educational institutes: a systematic review, Psychiatric Quarterly source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Improving the social skills of children with mental health conditions can improve social inclusion, although possibly because the children behave in a more socially accepted manner.121,123”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [121] Louw, 2020, Enhancing social inclusion of young adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review of original empirical studies, J Appl Res Intellect Disabil source
- Not checked yetcites [123] Cremin, 2020, Autism awareness interventions for children and adolescents: a scoping review, J Dev Phys Disabil source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However there was a limited number of such interventions and, therefore, results must be interpreted with caution.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Access to work or employment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In their review of stigma-reduction programmes among African Americans, Rivera and colleagues 172 concluded that such programmes need to be culturally informed and tailored.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [172] Rivera, 2021, A narrative review of mental illness stigma reduction interventions among african americans in the United States, J Ment Health Clin Psychol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, the authors concluded that it was important to ensure positive encounters, which seemed to reduce social distance, whereas negative encounters can have the opposite effect.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > General population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [173] Scior, 2011, Public awareness, attitudes and beliefs regarding intellectual disability: a systematic review, Res Dev Disabil source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, interventions that included communication strategies might facilitate self-confidence in caregivers, leading to improved understanding of the needs of the person with a mental health condition.152,182”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Social networking
What the sources say
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most self-stigma interventions involve groups, which can create barriers for people who are not willing to disclose a mental health condition to others.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Collaborative community-based care and social networking
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While clearer evidence is needed, the findings so far suggest that anti-stigma interventions could be costeffective at the programme and population levels.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Cost-effectiveness
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Integration of antistigma interventions into larger governmental priorities, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, might also support longevity.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The selected case studies are representative of different types of anti-stigma interventions across a wide variety of geographical and cultural locations and with diverse target groups.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stigma reduction can also be an intended or unintended consequence of policies delivered in the field of mental health.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Key characteristics of anti-stigma programmes
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Despite the positive aspects, the largely unregulated nature of these media means that they also present serious challenges, such as credibility and trustworthiness of information 264 and, while not being inherently harmful, might be sources of risk for stigma.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Indonesia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [264] O'Reilly, 2019, Potential of social media in promoting mental health in adolescents, Health Promot Int source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, there is increasing concern that substantial social media use is associated with low self-esteem, anxiety, and depression, especially among young women.255,256”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Stigma and the media
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [255] Andreassen, 2017, The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: findings from a large national survey, Addict Behav source
- Not checked yetcites [256] Woods, 2016, #Sleepyteens: social media use in adolescence is associated with poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression and low self-esteem, J Adolesc source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Diverse funding, variation of programmes for multiple target groups, crowd-funding activities (such as those employed by Batyr, Australia), and revenuegenerating programmes (eg, as used in Working Minds, Canada) can all complement governmental funding and help programmes to continue in the long-term.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The selected case studies are representative of different types of anti-stigma interventions across a wide variety of geographical and cultural locations and with diverse target groups.
In the paper
“For instance, public stigma may be exacerbated by the structure of mental health services in a given country, and deinstitutionalisation can facilitate stigma reduction.241”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Key characteristics of anti-stigma programmes
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [241] Winkler, 2021, Development of public stigma toward people with mental health problems in Czechia 2013–2019, Eur Psychiatry source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A review of Spanish news coverage reported that a quarter of the analysed news stories included stigmatising contents, often using stereotypes of danger and unpredictability.268”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [268] Muñoz, 2011, La enfermedad mental en los medios de comunicación: un estudio empírico en prensa escrita, radio y televisión, Clin Salud
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although mental health care is scarce in low-resource settings, the services that do exist are often institutionalising and may reinforce stigma or exclusion.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Mental health care is scarce in low-resource settings.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The search yielded 1826 results.After screening the titles and abstracts and removing duplicates, 102 papers were chosen for full-text review, and of these 24 publications were included in the final analysis.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Review of evidence on media impact on mental health stigma and discrimination Methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Using digital communication methods can be very effective, and they have been suggested to be important components in delivering anti-stigma campaigns.131”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Policy Programmes target policy change, securing funding, and sustainment through policy integration
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Ito-Jaeger, 2021, Digital video interventions and mental health literacy among young people: a scoping review, J Ment Health
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The selected case studies are representative of different types of anti-stigma interventions across a wide variety of geographical and cultural locations and with diverse target groups.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four researchers (HL, NVSJ, AM, and PCG) did the qualitative data analysis.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Larger sample sizes ensure the survey dataset provides richness and depth of data when viewed in its entirety.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given the evidence of the power of the media to affect public attitudes and policy, it is probable that media reporting can also increase or reduce structural discrimination, through their influences on voters and policy makers, but there is a lack of empirical evidence to support this view at present.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Regarding media and suicide prevention, in 2017, WHO released updated guidelines for media professionals.283”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [283] 2017
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall these data suggest that media guidelines on suicide reporting may be important for stigma reduction, but that they are often incompletely implemented.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“WHO reports that more than 700 000 people die every year due to suicide, and it is the fourth leading cause of death among young people worldwide.302”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [302] 2014
plainn = 700,000- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ethics approval for this work was granted by the Health Faculties Research Ethics Subcommittee at King's College London, UK (RESCM-21/22-25892).”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Lived experience survey methods
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The questions used in this survey were specifically developed for this report by the Lancet Commissioners, including PWLE.Before launching the survey, the questions were piloted with PWLE to ensure question content, timing, and comprehension were appropriate.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Survey procedure and data collection
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Conversely, the Papageno effect occurs when media show how people can positively overcome a suicidal crisis and turn towards recovery.305”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Poem 6
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [305] Domaradzki, 2021, The Werther effect, the Papageno effect or no effect? A literature review, Int J Environ Res Public Health source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The term committed suicide, for example, might suggest that suicide is a criminal act, even where it has been decriminalised whereas died by suicide is non-judgemental.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Person in Georgia
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To increase the inclusiveness and reach of the survey, it was made available for completion online in Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian, and Spanish, reflecting the six official WHO languages.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Survey procedure and data collection
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“WHO's Comprehensive Action Plan 2013-30 clearly states, “The vision of the action plan is a world in which mental health is valued, promoted and protected, mental health conditions are prevented and persons affected by these conditions are able to exercise the full range of human rights and to access high quality, culturally-appropriate health care and social care in a timely way to promote recove”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Conclusions: Commission guiding principles, goals, recommendations, and call to action
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [315] 2021
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Participants' responses to each question were synthesised through a combination of digital text network analysis using InfraNodus (version Pro 2022) and thematic content analysis.314”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [314] Braun, 2006, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qual Res Psychol source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, responses to each question were translated to English using Google Scholar, and selected quotes were crosschecked by native speakers of each language.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The global survey respondents are representative of people with lived experience of mental health conditions worldwide.
“In a global, multilanguage survey of PWLE, 391 people responded from 45 countries and territories.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The findings of the umbrella review of 216 systematic reviews are generalisable to all countries and cultures worldwide.
“Our umbrella review of 216 systematic reviews shows that interventions based on the principle of social contact (whether in person, virtual, or indirect) that have been appropriately adapted to different contexts and cultures are the most effective ways to reduce stigmatisation worldwide”
The paper relies on this without support.
The lessons from the ten large-scale anti-stigma programmes are applicable to other programmes and contexts.
“Our evaluation of ten large-scale anti-stigma programmes around the world found that they are most effective when they involve people with lived experience of mental health conditions (PWLE) as co-producers in all aspects of development, when target groups are consulted on programme content and delivery, and when programmes are sustained over the long term”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Diagnoses are necessary for communication among health workers, people with lived experience, family members, and policy makers, and for planning and financing treatment and care.
“Throughout this report, however, we assume that diagnoses are necessary for reasons of communication for health workers, PWLE, family members, and policy makers, and for planning and financing treatments and care.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Culture strongly influences stigma by determining what behaviour is socially acceptable and by shaping beliefs about the causes and treatment of mental health conditions.
“Culture has a strong influence on stigma because of the role that culture plays in determining what is considered”
The paper relies on this without support.
The selected case studies are representative of different types of anti-stigma interventions across a wide variety of geographical and cultural locations and with diverse target groups.
“We selected case studies purposively that were representative of different types of anti-stigma interventions in a wide variety of geographical and cultural locations and with diverse target groups (panel 3, table 1).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Mental health care is scarce in low-resource settings.
“Although mental health care is scarce in low-resource settings, the services that do exist are often institutionalising and may reinforce stigma or exclusion.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The media have great power over citizens and shape perceptions of reality and interpretation of the world.
“The media wield great power over citizens and influence perceptions of reality and interpretation of the world.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Media messaging affects all elements of stigma, including knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours.
“Media messaging affects all elements of stigma, including knowledge, attitudes, behaviours.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Media can be beneficial or harmful for stigma.
“Media can be beneficial (actively reducing stigma) or harmful (perpetuating stereotypes or negative attitudes or behaviours).”
The paper relies on this without support.
For many young people, social media are among their most vital tools for community, self-expression, and challenging stigma.
“For many young people social media are among their most vital tools for community, self-expression, and for challenging stigma.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Until about 20 years ago, traditional media were the main source of mass information and professional journalists were almost exclusively the disseminators of news and information.
“Until only about 20 years ago, these media were the main source of mass information and professional journalists were almost exclusively the ones who served as disseminators of news and information.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Several anti-stigma programmes have identified the media as a target group for interventions.
“For this reason several anti-stigma programmes have identified the media as a target group for interventions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Adherence to suicide reporting guidelines is especially low in LMICs, where suicides are often sensationalised, stigmatised, and even criminalised in media portrayals.
“Adherence to suicide reporting guidelines is especially low in LMICs, where suicides are often sensationalised, stigmatised, and even criminalised in their portrayals in the media.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Hindu newspaper follows suicide reporting guidelines, accompanies every suicide report with helpline contact details, and has been recognised by Sneha for excellence in reporting and prevention of suicides.
“A notable exception in India is the national newspaper The Hindu, which does follow guidelines.Every report of a suicide is accompanied by helpline contact details for people who need support.The Hindu has been recognised by the support hotline Sneha for its excellence in the reporting and prevention of suicides.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The neglect of youth mental health can be partly ascribed to the stigma-based neglect of mental health worldwide.”
From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
In the citing paper
“No real progress of psychiatry is likely to occur without a strong collaboration among professionals, PWLE, family/informal supporters, and policy makers 13 .”
From Ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry: an overview and an appraisal of possible strategies and research needs (2024) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“These barriers can be even stronger for individuals among minority and disadvantaged backgrounds that may be stigmatised, such as individuals with ethnic or sexuality minority status [Clement et al., 2015, Thornicroft et al., 2022].”
From Closing the accessibility gap to mental health treatment with a personalized self-referral chatbot (2024) · cites this paper as Thornicroft et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“This can be due to barriers, such as a lack of perceived need for treatment, negative attitudes and stigma around mental health, as well as structural barriers [Andrade et al., 2014, Thornicroft et al., 2022].”
From Closing the accessibility gap to mental health treatment with a personalized self-referral chatbot (2024) · cites this paper as Thornicroft et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
“over 90% agreed that PWLE should be treated as well as people with physical health conditions, that stigma and discrimination negatively affect most people with mental health conditions, and that the media could play an important part in reducing stigma and discrimination.”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Statistical analyses
“Stigma and discrimination do negatively affect most people with mental health conditions 7 (2%) 11 (3%) 21 (5%) 132 (33%) 219 (56%) 3•40 (0•86) 90%”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Abstract
“From the almost 300 respondents in 45 countries (mostly low-income and middle-income countries [LMICs])”
§ The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health > Survey results
“391 participants responded to the survey from 45 countries and territories”
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Stigma; Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity
Defleur, M., & Goffman, E. (1964) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575995 · Cited by 23,025
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510
Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363 · Cited by 8,848
The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development
Patel, V., Saxena, S., Lund, C., Thornicroft, G., Baingana, F., Bolton, P., Chisholm, D., Collins, P. Y., Cooper, J. L., Eaton, J., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31612-x · Cited by 3,692
Self-citationClement, S., Schauman, O., Graham, T., Maggioni, F., Evans-Lacko, S., Bezborodovs, N., Morgan, C., Rüsch, N., Brown, J. S. L., & Thornicroft, G. (2015) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291714000129 · Cited by 3,152
Self-citationSnowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research
Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaei, F. (2017) · Strides in development of medical education · doi:10.5812/sdme.67670 · Cited by 3,013
Walker, E. R., McGee, R. E., & Druss, B. G. (2015) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2502 · Cited by 2,976
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230 · Cited by 2,736
The Paradox of Self-Stigma and Mental Illness
Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.9.1.35 · Cited by 2,058
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Henderson, 2014, Mental health-related stigma in health care and mental health-care settings, Lancet Psychiatry, 1, 467, 10.1016/s2215-0366(14)00023-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Valic, 2013, A review of the literature and media reports of patterns of mental health stigma and addressing stigma in Slovenia until 2010, Zdr Varst, 52, 47
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health
McGorry, P. D., Mei, C., Dalal, N., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Blakemore, S.-J., Browne, V., Dooley, B., Hickie, I. B., Jones, P. B., McDaid, D., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00163-9 · Cited by 663
Global Mental Health: Where We Are and Where We Are Going
Moitra, M., Owens, S., Hailemariam, M., Wilson, K. S., Mensa‐Kwao, A., Gonese, G., Kiruthu-Kamamia, C., White, B., Young, D. M., & Collins, P. Y. (2023) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-023-01426-8 · Cited by 274
The Lancet Public Health Commission on gambling
Wardle, H., Degenhardt, L. J., Marionneau, V., Reith, G., Livingstone, C. H., Sparrow, M. K., Tran, L. T., Biggar, B., Bunn, C., Farrell, M., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00167-1 · Cited by 276
“18 In this Commission, guided by input from our lived experience contributors (appendix pp 3, 4), we adopt a person-centred approach, referring to people who gamble, people with gambling disorder, and people experiencing gambling harms.”
Rugulies, R., Aust, B., Greiner, B. A., Arensman, E., Kawakami, N., LaMontagne, A. D., & Madsen, I. E. H. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00869-3 · Cited by 273
Transforming mental health systems globally: principles and policy recommendations
Patel, V., Saxena, S., Lund, C., Kohrt, B., Kieling, C., Sunkel, C., Kola, L., Chang, O., Charlson, F., O’Neill, K., et al. (2023) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00918-2 · Cited by 209
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thornicroft, G., Sunkel, C., Alikhon Aliev, A., Baker, S., Brohan, E., el Chammay, R., Davies, K., Demissie, M., Duncan, J., Fekadu, W., Gronholm, P. C., Guerrero, Z., Gurung, D., Habtamu, K., Hanlon, C., Heim, E., Henderson, C., Hijazi, Z., Hoffman, C., Hosny, N., Huang, F.-X., Kline, S., Kohrt, B. A., Lempp, H., Li, J., London, E., Ma, N., Mak, W. W. S., Makhmud, A., Maulik, P. K., Milenova, M., Morales Cano, G., Ouali, U., Parry, S., Rangaswamy, T., Rüsch, N., Sabri, T., Sartorius, N., Schulze, M., Stuart, H., Taylor Salisbury, T., Vera San Juan, N., Votruba, N., & Winkler, P.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Mind (GB)
- Haramaya University (ET)
- Bahir Dar University (ET)
- National Institute of Mental Health (CZ)
- Addis Ababa University (ET)
- University of Lausanne (CH)
- United Nations Children's Fund (US)
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- George Washington University (US)
- Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
- Peking University (CN)
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Tunis University (TN)
- Universität Ulm (DE)
- Queen's University (CA)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Thornicroft, Graham
- ORCID
- Thornicroft, Graham
- Sunkel, Charlene
- Brohan, Elaine
- Demissie, Mekdes
- Fekadu, Wubalem
- Gronholm, Petra C
- Guerrero, Zoe
- Gurung, Dristy
- Habtamu, Kassahun
- Hanlon, Charlotte
- Heim, Eva
- Henderson, Claire
- Hosny, Nadine
- Kline, Sarah
- Kohrt, Brandon A
- Lempp, Heidi
- Li, Jie
- Mak, Winnie W S
- Makhmud, Akerke
- Maulik, Pallab K
- Milenova, Maria
- Ouali, Uta
- Parry, Sarah
- Rüsch, Nicolas
- Sabri, Taha
- Sartorius, Norman
- Stuart, Heather
- Votruba, Nicole
- Winkler, Petr
- Venue
- The Lancet
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 400
- Issue
- 10361
- Pages
- 1438-1480
- ISSN
- 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
- 0140-6736
- OpenAlex
- W4303940215
- Semantic Scholar
- 59590b5243b81e3fa4b20c1c716156e205d7f5a2
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 307
- Citations by year
- 2026: 190 · 2025: 220 · 2024: 209 · 2023: 121 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 20.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- iris.unil.ch
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council (MR/R023697/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Keywords
- mental health stigma, discrimination against people with mental illness, stigma reduction, lived experience, people with lived experience, co-production, mental health policy, mental health law, mental health services
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Social Stigma, Social Discrimination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review