Cited by 30Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Mechanisms of Pavlovian fear conditioning: has the engram been located?

Paré, Denis·2002·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Uncertainty persists as to whether the amygdala is a crucial site of plasticity for classically conditioned fear or merely a sensory relay to structures generating fear responses. A recent Nature study suggests that associative synaptic changes take place in neurons of the amygdala during fear conditioning, and that these changes require dopamine-mediated modulation. Nevertheless, these findings do not prove that the amygdala is a sufficient site of plasticity for fear memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02243-9

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is widely believed that LA plasticity underlying fear learning occurs as a result of a Hebbian mechanism whereby the shock US directly depolarizes LA pyramidal cells that are concurrently activated by weaker CS inputs, resulting in potentiation of the CS input synapses.

    “It is widely believed that LA plasticity underlying fear learning occurs as a result of a Hebbian mechanism whereby the shock US directly depolarizes LA pyramidal cells that are concurrently activated by weaker CS inputs, resulting in potentiation of the CS input synapses (5, 6, 9, 31).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paré, D.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Paré, Denis
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
436-437
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981181589
Cited by
30
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
fear conditioning, amygdala, fear memory, synaptic plasticity, dopamine, engram, associative learning, fear memory consolidation
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Conditioning, Psychological, Fear, Neuronal Plasticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review