PreprintCited by 171Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Differential Fear Conditioning Induces Reciprocal Changes in the Sensory Responses of Lateral Amygdala Neurons to the CS+ and CS−

Open access
Collins, Dawn R., Paré, Denis·2000·Learning & Memory

Abstract

In classical fear conditioning, a neutral sensory stimulus (CS) acquires the ability to elicit fear responses after pairing to a noxious unconditioned stimulus (US). As amygdala lesions prevent the acquisition of fear responses and the lateral amygdaloid (LA) nucleus is the main input station of the amygdala for auditory afferents, the effect of auditory fear conditioning on the sensory responsiveness of LA neurons has been examined. Although conditioning was shown to increase CS-evoked LA responses, the specificity of the changes in responsiveness was not tested. Because conditioning might induce nonspecific increases in LA responses to auditory afferents, we re-examined this issue in conscious, head-restrained cats using a differential conditioning paradigm where only one of two tones (CS+but not CS−) was paired to the US. Differential conditioning increased unit and field responses to the CS+, whereas responses to the CS− decreased. Such changes have never been observed in the amygdala except in cases where the CS− had been paired to the US before and fear responses not extinguished. This suggests that fear conditioning is not only accompanied by potentiation of amygdalopetal pathways conveying the CS+ but also by the depression of sensory inputs unpaired to noxious stimuli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.7.2.97

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several lines of indirect evidence support the idea that this plasticity occurs as a result of a Hebbian mechanism through which depolarization of LA pyramidal neurons by the shock US coincident with weaker activation of the same cells by auditory CS inputs results in fear learning.

    “Several lines of indirect evidence support the idea that this plasticity occurs as a result of a Hebbian mechanism through which depolarization of LA pyramidal neurons by the shock US coincident with weaker activation of the same cells by auditory CS inputs results in fear learning (8–18).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, D. R., & Paré, D.
Affiliations
Université Laval (CA)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
97-103
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2150451377
Cited by
171
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
differential fear conditioning, lateral amygdala, auditory fear conditioning, sensory responsiveness, fear extinction, single-unit responses, field response, cats
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Amygdala, Animals, Auditory Pathways, Cats, Conditioning, Psychological, Discrimination, Psychological, Electric Stimulation, Electromyography, Electrophysiology, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Head, Neurons, Reaction Time, Restraint, Physical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review