Cited by 312Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Neural substrates for expectation-modulated fear learning in the amygdala and periaqueductal gray

Open access
Johansen, Joshua P, Tarpley, Jason W, LeDoux, Joseph E, Blair, Hugh T·2010·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

A form of aversively motivated learning called fear conditioning occurs when a neutral conditioned stimulus is paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (UCS). UCS-evoked depolarization of amygdala neurons may instruct Hebbian plasticity that stores memories of the conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus association, but the origin of UCS inputs to the amygdala is unknown. Theory and evidence suggest that instructive UCS inputs to the amygdala will be inhibited when the UCS is expected, but this has not been found during fear conditioning. We investigated neural pathways that relay information about the UCS to the amygdala by recording neurons in the amygdala and periaqueductal gray (PAG) of rats during fear conditioning. UCS-evoked responses in both amygdala and PAG were inhibited by expectation. Pharmacological inactivation of the PAG attenuated UCS-evoked responses in the amygdala and impaired acquisition of fear conditioning, indicating that PAG may be an important part of the pathway that relays instructive signals to the amygdala.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2594

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Periaqueductal gray neurons respond more strongly to unexpected than expected electric shocks, consistent with the fMRI findings.

    “PAG neurons respond more strongly to unexpected vs. expected electric shocks18, consistent with our fMRI findings here.”
  • The periaqueductal gray sends monosynaptic reciprocal projections to ventromedial prefrontal cortex and to anterior mid-cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, and other areas involved in action value and defensive behavior.

    “It also sends monosynaptic, reciprocal projections to the vmPFC—which is essential for value updating in the RL framework and likely for behavioral choice as well31—and to aMCC32, OFC and other areas involved in determining action value and coordinating defensive behavior18,33.”
  • The anterior mid-cingulate cortex is critical for pain avoidance and is heavily connected to motor and premotor centers.

    “The aMCC in particular is critical for pain avoidance18 and is heavily connected to motor and premotor centers (aMCC).”
  • Animal models of fear conditioning suggest that regions encoding avoidance value receive prediction error signals generated in the PAG.

    “Based on existent animal models of fear conditioning1,18, we posited that these regions receive the PE signals generated in PAG.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [37]Sutton RS Barto AG Reinforcement Learning The MIT Press 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johansen, J. P., Tarpley, J. W., LeDoux, J. E., & Blair, H. T.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
  • Tarpley, Jason W
  • Blair, Hugh T
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2010-07-04
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
979-986
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2112569537
Cited by
312
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH073700)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
fear conditioning, periaqueductal gray, amygdala, expectations, Hebbian plasticity, fear memory, neural pathways, pharmacological inactivation
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Conditioning, Classical, Electrodes, Implanted, Electrophysiology, Evoked Potentials, Fear, Learning, Male, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Periaqueductal Gray, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review