Cited by 259Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Correlations among two self-report questionnaires for measuring DSM-defined anxiety disorder symptoms in children: the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders and the Spence Children's Anxiety Scale

Open access
Muris, Peter, Schmidt, Henk, Merckelbach, Harald·2000·Personality and Individual Differences

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00102-6

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SCAS/SCAS-P has demonstrated acceptable internal consistency for the total score (Cronbach's alpha 0.89-0.92) and for individual subscales (0.57-0.82).

    “Research utilising the SCAS/SCAS-P has demonstrated acceptable internal consistency for the total score (Cronbach's alpha ranging between 0.89 and 0.92) and for the individual subscales (Cronbach's alpha ranging between 0.57 and 0.82) (Muris, Schmidt, & Merckelbach, 2000;Nauta et al., 2004;Spence, 1998;Spence, Barrett, & Turner, 2003).”

    From The efficacy of a group-based, disorder-specific treatment program for childhood GAD - A randomized controlled trial (2014) · cites this paper as Muris et al., 2000

    Section 3.1 reports an SCAS total-score alpha of 0.92 and subscale alphas of 0.57–0.81, supporting part of the stated ranges. This paper does not report SCAS-P results or the cited endpoints of 0.89 for the total score and 0.82 for subscales; those may come from the other studies cited in the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Marsh, H. M., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-®t indexes in con®rmatory factor analysis: the eect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391±410.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muris, P., Schmidt, H., & Merckelbach, H.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Muris, Peter
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-02
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
333-346
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138023834
Cited by
259
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 20
FWCI
9.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
SCARED, Spence Children's Anxiety Scale, childhood anxiety disorders, concurrent validity, self-report questionnaire, factor structure, elementary school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review