Exploring the opioid system by gene knockout
Abstract
The endogenous opioid system consists of three opioid peptide precursor genes encoding enkephalins (preproenkephalin, Penk), dynorphins (preprodynorphin, Pdyn) and beta-endorphin (betaend), proopiomelanocortin (POMC) and three receptor genes encoding mu-opiod receptor (MOR), delta-opiod receptor (DOR) and kappa-opiod receptor (KOR). In the past years, all six genes have been inactivated in mice by homologous recombination. The analysis of spontaneous behavior in mutant mice has demonstrated significant and distinct roles of each gene in modulating locomotion, pain perception and emotional behaviors. The observation of opposing phenotypes of MOR- and DOR-deficient mice in several behaviors highlights unexpected roles for DOR to be further explored genetically and using more specific delta compounds. The analysis of responses of mutant mice to exogenous opiates has definitely clarified the essential role of MOR in both morphine analgesia and addiction, and demonstrated that DOR and KOR remain promising targets for pain treatment. These studies also show that prototypic DOR agonists partially require MOR for their biological activity and provide some support for the postulated mu-delta interactions in vivo. Finally, data confirm and define a role for several genes of the opioid system in responses to other drugs of abuse, and the triple opioid receptor knockout mutant allows exploring non-classical opioid pharmacology. In summary, the study of null mutant mice has extended our previous knowledge of the opioid system by identifying the molecular players in opioid pharmacology and physiology. Future studies should involve parallel behavioral analysis of mice lacking receptors and peptides and will benefit from more sophisticated gene targeting approaches, including site-directed and anatomically-restricted mutations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Behavioral differences in Oprm1 mutant mice compared with wild-type mice showed that pain and emotional-like and reward-related behaviors correlated predominantly with alterations within reward/aversion pathways.
“Behavioral differences in Oprm1 mutant mice compared with wild-type mice showed that pain and emotional-like and rewardrelated behaviors correlated predominantly with alterations within reward/aversion pathways (Kieffer and Gaveriaux-Ruff, 2002).”
From Drug Addiction: Hyperkatifeia/Negative Reinforcement as a Framework for Medications Development (2021) · cites this paper as Kieffer and Gaveriaux-Ruff, 2002
Cites
Matthes, H. W. D., Maldonado, R., Simonin, F., Valverde, O., Slowe, S., Kitchen, I., Befort, K., Dierich, A., Le Meur, M., Dollé, P., et al. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/383819a0 · Cited by 1,722 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ketamine and Ketamine Metabolite Pharmacology: Insights into Therapeutic Mechanisms
Zanos, P., Moaddel, R., Morris, P. J., Riggs, L. M., Highland, J. N., Georgiou, P., Pereira, E. F. R., Albuquerque, E. X., Thomas, C. J., Zarate, C. A., et al. (2018) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.117.015198 · Cited by 1,260 · see citing works
Reward Processing by the Opioid System in the Brain
Le Merrer, J., Becker, J. A. J., Befort, K., & Kieffer, B. L. (2009) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00005.2009 · Cited by 1,013 · see citing works
Self-citationEisenberger, N. I. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3231 · Cited by 1,016 · see citing works
Polydrug abuse: a review of opioid and benzodiazepine combination use
Jones, J. D., Mogali, S., & Comer, S. D. (2012) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.07.004 · Cited by 703 · see citing works
Camí, J., & Farré, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra023160 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Neurobiology of opioid addiction: Opponent process, hyperkatifeia, and negative reinforcement
Koob, G. F. (2020) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.05.023 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Dynorphin, stress, and depression
Knoll, A. T., & Carlezon, W. A. (2010) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.074 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Deficit in Attachment Behavior in Mice Lacking the µ-Opioid Receptor Gene
Moles, A., Kieffer, B. L., & D'Amato, F. R. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1095943 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Self-citationDrug Addiction: Hyperkatifeia/Negative Reinforcement as a Framework for Medications Development
Koob, G. F. (2021) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pharmrev.120.000083 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Way, B. M., Taylor, S. E., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812612106 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Ogden, C. A., Rich, M. E., Schork, N. J., Paulus, M. P., Geyer, M. A., Lohr, J. B., Kuczenski, R., & Niculescu, A. B. (2004) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001547 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Cell surface targeting of μ-δ opioid receptor heterodimers by RTP4
Décaillot, F. M., Rozenfeld, R., Gupta, A., & Devi, L. A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804106105 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Raehal, K. M., & Bohn, L. M. (2014) · Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41199-1_22 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Acute Rhodiola Rosea Intake Can Improve Endurance Exercise Performance
De Bock, K., Eijnde, B. O., Ramaekers, M., & Hespel, P. (2004) · International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism · doi:10.1123/ijsnem.14.3.298 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Berrendero, F., Robledo, P., Trigo, J. M., Martín-García, E., & Maldonado, R. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.02.006 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Adenylyl cyclase type 5 (AC5) is an essential mediator of morphine action
Kim, K.-S., Lee, K.-W., Lee, K.-W., Im, J.-Y., Yoo, J. Y., Kim, S.-W., Lee, J.-K., Nestler, E. J., & Han, P.-L. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0508812103 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Does the kappa opioid receptor system contribute to pain aversion?
Cahill, C. M., Taylor, A. M. W., Cook, C., Ong, E., Morón, J. A., & Evans, C. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2014.00253 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Desale, S. E., Chidambaram, H., & Chinnathambi, S. (2021) · Molecular Biomedicine · doi:10.1186/s43556-021-00036-1 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Deletion of the mu opioid receptor gene in mice reshapes the reward-aversion connectome
Mechling, A. E., Arefin, T., Lee, H.-L., Bienert, T., Reisert, M., Ben Hamida, S., Darcq, E., Ehrlich, A., Gaveriaux-Ruff, C., Parent, M. J., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1601640113 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationThe opioid epidemic: a central role for the blood brain barrier in opioid analgesia and abuse
Schaefer, C. P., Tome, M. E., & Davis, T. P. (2017) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/s12987-017-0080-3 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
de Souza, F. S. J., Nasif, S., López-Leal, R., Levi, D. H., Low, M. J., & Rubinsten, M. (2011) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.10.114 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Ivy and Neurogliaform Interneurons Are a Major Target of μ-Opioid Receptor Modulation
Krook-Magnuson, E., Luu, L., Lee, S.-H., Varga, C., & Soltesz, I. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2269-11.2011 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Nadal, X., La Porta, C., Andreea Bura, S., & Maldonado, R. (2013) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.01.077 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Jówko, E., Sadowski, J., Długołęcka, B., Gierczuk, D., Opaszowski, B., & Cieśliński, I. (2018) · Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2016.05.005 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Tsai, N.-P., Lin, Y.-L., Tsui, Y.-C., & Wei, L.-N. (2010) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200910083 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Solecki, W., Ziolkowska, B., Krowka, T., Gieryk, A., Filip, M., & Przewlocki, R. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.002 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kieffer, B. L., & Gavériaux-Ruff, C.
- Affiliations
- Institut de génétique et de biologie moléculaire et cellulaire (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Kieffer, Brigitte L
- ORCID
- Kieffer, Brigitte L
- Venue
- Progress in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 285-306
- ISSN
- 0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086139880
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- endogenous opioid system, mu-opioid receptor, delta opioid receptor, kappa opioid receptor, preproenkephalin, preprodynorphin, beta-endorphin, proopiomelanocortin, locomotion, pain perception, emotional behavior, morphine analgesia, opioid use disorder, opioid pharmacology
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain Chemistry, Receptors, Opioid, Mice, Knockout, Opioid Peptides, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review